MORE
Most Recent Entries
Monthly Archives
Congestion? I Give Up
Posted January 17, 2006 by Rick Barry
Updated Jan 17, 2006 at 10:39 AM
No less a publication than the New York Times Magazine ( .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) but the full article costs $3.95) has ventured into a somewhat scary area of traffic theory _ that when congestion gets to a certain point, there really isn’t much we can do about it.
Unless, that is, ““we have a lot of money.
California was first, but the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area is close behind, in the development of ““automated express toll lanes.’’ These things are an additional lane, sometimes built and run by private entities, where the well-heeled can buy themselves out of gridlock. Onboard transponders automatically charge the motorist as much as $30 for a 50-mile run around the stalled, fuming masses.
Actual rates vary depending on how bad the traffic jam actually is, as measured by sensors on the roadway.
Gridlock here, one presumes, is not yet quite bad enough for there to be big enough money in the prospect of adding lanes to I-4 or I-275 for an entrepreneur to start building highway lanes and charging for their use. But our traffic woes are getting worse pretty quickly, and the state Department of Transportation has pretty well conceded it can’t keep up.
Sustained, even worsening, gridlock is of course is essential to assure a good return on the entrepreneur’s investment.
Then comes the question of who enforces the exclusivity of these lanes, although for the most part now they are separated by concrete barriers and access to them is limited to those with transponders.
But somehow the whole concept seems ... You fill in the blank.
This Just In ...
Posted January 16, 2006 by Rick Barry
Updated Jan 16, 2006 at 11:01 AM
TAMPA—The northbound I-275 exit ramp to Scott Street (Exit 44) has REOPENED. This ramp had been closed where the ramps splits to Ashley Drive since July 17, 2005 for I-275 construction work in that area.
______________________________
The High Cost of Free Parking
Posted January 16, 2006 by Rick Barry
Updated Jan 16, 2006 at 03:02 PM
A book appeared on my desk this morning, a heavy one, with the above title. Turns out it came from Tribune Staffer Mark Holan, who covers Hillsborough County for Ma Trib. It’s by Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at UCLA.
The book, all 733 pages of it _ I’ll read it and get back to you. Right. _ explores the premise that free parking, or cheap parking, are neither free nor cheap. Each of those spaces, says Shoup, costs way more than the average car, first to the developer, then to tenants, and then, in the form of higher prices for goods and services, to us. And zoning codes require all manner of off-street spaces _ 1.5 per nozzle at a gas station, 10 per daily funeral at a mauseleum _ based on peak demand, in places that lack public transit or pedestrian-friendly amenities.
Shoup recommends ending the requirement that developers provide off-street parking; charging fair market prices for curb parking; and, using the revenue from curb parking to pay for neighborhood improvements in the neighborhood that generates the revenue.
I guess the theory is that expensive parking would increase the demand for mass transit, and places would look a lot better without so many garages and poorly maintained remote lots. Sounds radical, but maybe I should read the book.
Here Goes The Commute
Posted January 12, 2006 by Rick Barry
Updated Jan 12, 2006 at 05:23 PM
I cover commuting issues for The Tampa Tribune. This web log is designed to help, or at least provide a forum for us, to help each other.
Ask questions. We’ll try to find answers. We can share safety tips, shortcuts, areas to avoid, better routes, ways to save money, save gas - to better survive the daily grind.
We spend a lot of time in our cars. What do we do with that time? Has your commute affected other areas of your life? Your budget?
Share with me where you drive each day, how long it takes you - now, compared to a few years ago. Tell us how you cope with traffic, how you like your carpool, van pool, your bus commute - if you’re among the few who can, or are willing to, live without your car during the work day.
Maybe we can ease the burden of our ever-lengthening commute.
For information before heading out on your commute, check TBO.com’s Traffic page at http://traffic.tbo.com.
Starting ‘06 In High Gear, With High Hopes
Posted January 09, 2006 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:54 PM
So far, it seems the year is off to a strong start. Density is increasing downtown, city public-art projects are abounding and road improvements are in the works both on the drawing board and on hard ground.
First off the block is the Manhattan Avenue widening project. This $9.3 million job will widen the two-lane road to five lanes (two northbound, two southbound and one center-turn lane) along the stretch between Euclid Avenue and Gandy Boulevard.
It’s hoped the construction, expected to take about 18 months, will ease congestion and reduce flooding, as a new stormwater system and retention pond also will be installed.
City council is holding a public groundbreaking ceremony for the project Jan. 24 at 10:30 a.m. The starting location hasn’t been revealed yet, but I’m sure that will get settled soon.
Area residents can expect some headaches and snarls, but that comes with the territory of major construction work. In the long run, I’m guessing most of them will breathe sighs of relief as traffic lightens along Manhattan and its side streets.
In other road news, City Councilman John Dingfelder sent me a note about the council’s recent vote to fund an engineering study for the intersection of Dale Mabry Highway and Kennedy Boulevard.
The crossing has needed attention for a while now. Back in June, a peek at the city’s “Top 100†list of high-incident traffic-crash locations revealed 16 South Tampa intersections making the charts. Most of them radiated out in cross formation from an epicenter at Dale Mabry and Kennedy.
At the time, that intersection ranked No. 39 on the list, with 12 crashes in a 90-day period. I speculated many of them were left-turn fiascos, based solely on personal experience.
Fast-forward six months and things haven’t changed much. As of Jan. 6, the Dale Mabry/Kennedy intersection was up to No. 31 on the charts, but logged fewer accidents – 11 crashes in 90 days. Guess that means we’re having slightly fewer crashes overall.
The engineering study is a welcome step toward improvement. In his e-mail, Dingfelder explained the plan: to work with the Florida Department of Transportation to add an additional northbound lane on Dale Mabry “to assist traffic getting through that miserable spot.â€
The city hopes this will not only help motorists and increase safety, but also might lessen neighborhood cut-through traffic in the area. I’m looking forward to seeing how it all pans out.
From the desk of Mayor Pam
Right before the New Year, I also received an e-mail from Mayor Pam Iorio, who made my day by telling me she regularly enjoys this column.
She was very gracious in addressing some of my more cynical quips about the state of Tampa’s streets, and she shed light on the future of basic roadway improvements.
Rather than paraphrase, I’m going to fully reproduce a portion of her well-put message below. It strengthened my confidence that Tampa is on the right path. I hope it does the same for you:
Dear Mitzi,
When I first became mayor, I was surprised to learn how little the city spent on basic road improvements. The budget in 2003 for street resurfacing, sign replacement, sidewalks and traffic calming was $2.6 million.
Since then we have embarked on a program called “Investing in Neighborhoods.†Each year we put more money into those basic areas I mentioned above. In the last budget adopted in October, we allocated $5.5 million.
Of that amount, $2.3 (million) goes for street resurfacing – not nearly enough. We have 2,600 miles of roadway and only address about 2.3 percent of our total roadways every year. To add a further challenge, material costs have gone up dramatically.
Our new transportation director, Roy LaMotte, spends a lot of time at neighborhood meetings addressing concerns, but we want to be realistic about what can be accomplished given the limitations of the budget.
However, I have given clear direction to our transportation and budgeting departments – that as long as I am mayor, I want to see the amount devoted to basic roadway improvements increase each budget year.
This is an important part of what makes a quality city.
Thanks for bringing issues to our attention and we will continue to work to address them.
Sincerely,
Pam
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Read Less...
Rolling Forward Into Another Year
Posted December 27, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:55 PM
It’s about that time again, if you can believe it. Folks are gearing up to celebrate another New Year’s Eve.
In the spirit of recollection and review that has settled over the South Tampa News, I’m taking a quick look both ways before I cross into the coming year.
Here are a few excerpts from our 2005 adventures on the road:
* After piles of petitions and vociferous complaints, Swann Estates residents received approval in spring 2005 for the installation of speed tables along Swann Avenue between Lois and Church avenues. A transportation study listed the Swann Avenue site among the city’s 64 worst speeding locations.
We keep pulling out the Band-Aids as growth continues.
* The Kennedy Boulevard Bridge was torn down and replaced with a smooth road designed to allow all Lee Roy Selmon Expressway lanes to unload directly onto Meridian Avenue.
The throughway was slated to reopen in May, but to this day is still blocked off, due in part to closures necessitated by rampant condo construction in the Channel District.
* Back in August, part of Bayshore Boulevard caved in after leaky joints in an underground stormwater culvert box loosened dirt below the road’s surface. The road was shut down for a few days while crews worked on repairs. Shortly thereafter, drivers resumed their usual cruising velocities along the boulevard.
A new electronic sign that racks and posts speeds of passing cars provided some deterrent to those inclined to abuse the limit.
* Walking signals on several downtown crosswalks get spiffed up with timers. Pedestrians now know exactly how many seconds remain until a maniacally speeding motorist tries to mow them over.
* Continued construction to Interstate 275 shut down an exit to Ashley Street, but no one in South Tampa noticed, because the intersection in question lay north of Kennedy Boulevard.
* Yet another wastewater cave-in struck in the fall, this time along the center lane of Platt Street, closing the thoroughfare from Plant Avenue east to Bayshore Boulevard. City workers keep putting out the proverbial fires as I spin gags about the 50-year-old pipes needing some reconstructive surgery.
* The long-sought-after traffic light at South Dale Mabry Highway and Ballast Point Boulevard was finally installed and, after a tense waiting period, was also lit. Residents breathed sighs of relief in anticipation of fewer fatal accidents.
* Resurfacing began on the western stretch of Bay to Bay Boulevard, well known for being riddled with eye-jiggling potholes. Unfortunately, the first step in resurfacing is to remove surface asphalt and score the road’s surface – so things get a little worse before they get better. Hang in there.
And so, several improvements are under way at last, but recent studies don’t speak well of local road conditions. A city audit listed more than 100 Tampa streets as being in such poor shape parts of them are barely adequate for travel.
The widening of Manhattan Avenue and improvements to the intersection of MacDill Avenue and Azeele Street are among projects expected to begin in early 2006.
Looking around at the state of our streets, and taking that audit into consideration, I’m guessing that’s going to be just the tip of the iceberg.
Until then, have a safe New Year.
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Read Less...
Interstate Guardrails Are Positioned For Safety
Posted December 23, 2005 by Penny Fletcher
Updated Dec 23, 2005 at 02:29 PM
Problems at some of South Shore’s Interstate 75 exit ramps have prompted enough letters I thought I’d devote a whole column to the subject.
Although I’ve received letters about long lines at the entrance ramps in the past, my recent column, “Crash Underscores Point of Telling Others Your Plans,†about a car that flipped 500 feet into the trees at the Sun City Center exit has prompted questions about guardrails on the ramps.
“I wish you would do a followup on your column (about the crash) because I cannot figure out why the Florida Department of Transportation allowed the guardrails to be installed on the wrong side of the roadway at Exit 240A (Sun City Center),†said Henry Niemczyk of Sun City Center. “Had the guardrails been installed correctly this incident might have been a minor traffic accident instead of a loss of two lives.â€
Traffic backups also are questioned, as pointed out in a letter from Apollo Beach resident Randall Hunter.
“I believe that much congestion and many accidents could be prevented by two-laning the southbound exit ramp from I-75 onto Big Bend Road. During rush-hour traffic, cars back up onto the southbound traffic lane (of the interstate) resulting in major problems. The ramp is already fairly wide and could be easily widened. Shortening the median strip on Big Bend Road as you turn west would complete the fix,†Hunter said.
Other letters reflected similar questions about exit ramps at Gibsonton Drive, Big Bend Road, Apollo Beach/Riverview and Ruskin/Sun City Center, so I called FDOT’s spokeswoman Kris Carson. She put me in touch with the man with the answers – Dwayne Kile, FDOT’s district design engineer.
Guardrails are placed with the intention of deflecting out-of-control cars back onto the road, Kile explained.
Getting a car to ricochet back into its lane instead of running off the road can improve the safety of those in that car, but could also endanger other cars, if they get in the way.
“That’s why we can’t put guardrails in some places, like the left-hand side of 240A (the Sun City Center exit),†Kile said. “Yes, a car went off and landed in the trees. But the speed limit there is posted at 25 mph.â€
To have gone 500 feet into the trees, the car must have been going over the posted speed limit, he said.
“We must look at all the possible angles (for a crash) and then make the best decision,†he explained. “The left side (of Exit 240 A at Sun City Center where the car went into the trees) is large and grassy. There are no houses. No roads. If we had the guardrail on the both sides, an out-of-control car could deflect back and forth causing multiple cars to lose control and flip. If it was on the opposite side (the right side as suggested in Niemczyk ‘s letter), out-of-control cars would be propelled at at an angle that would push them across lanes of traffic exiting the interstate,†he explained.
As for the Big Bend Road exit question, Kile said many places in northern Hillsborough County, especially at Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, have the same long backup problem.
“We realize this is an issue,†Kile said. “But Florida statutes say that 80 percent of our existing roadways must be maintained – resurfacing, fixing potholes and other conditions – before we can use any of our funds on new projects.â€
A maintenance criteria rating system determines the status of this, he said.
“Then, if we have extra money, we can make improvements, start new projects. Or, if we can get private funds – like the (U.S.) 301 widening project,†Kile said.
That project got started 15 years ahead of schedule because of funds from developers who wanted to build homes along U.S. 301 but couldn’t until traffic studies supported it.
I use the Gibsonton Drive, Big Bend Road, and Ruskin/Sun City Center exits just about every day. I see accidents near the ramps all the time. But I see them other places too, mostly at crossing sites along U.S. 301.
The way I see it, after living almost 30 years in South Shore, is that there are just too many people moving in at once. The housing for them is being built based on zoning densities that were permitted in the 1960s and ’70s. Despite what many people think, county commissioners aren’t assigning these high growth densities now.
Many of the communities now being built have even lowered the densities on the original land use permits (or have been forced to lower them) by county commissioners or the zoning hearing master when residents make a fuss about overcrowding.
The only thing people can do about projects already on the books is to monitor any zoning or site-plan modifications. Those are the yellow signs you see everywhere you look that give hearing dates and project ID numbers.
We must remember that a lot of the plans for developments now in progress were “set in stone†during the era preceding the arrest of three county commissioners – in 1983 – who were led from the county courthouse in handcuffs, and later convicted for taking bribes.
Now, as in northern Hillsborough County, development has overloaded our schools, roads and other infrastructure.
After all, who wouldn’t want to live here? The weather’s great. The wages may be low, but there are plenty of jobs, and the lifestyle here is a whole a lot better than shoveling snow in the frozen North.
We’ll either have to get used to the growth or move out. That’s just the way it is.
u Send your questions and comments for inclusion in this column to 3036 College Ave., Ruskin, FL 33570 or e-mail them to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Penny Fletcher is the editor of The Sun and the South Shore News.
Readers Share Thoughts On The Road
Posted December 20, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:43 PM
The ink was scarcely dry on last week’s Traffic Stop column when I discovered the light at South Dale Mabry Highway and Ballast Point Boulevard had been lit, at long last.
These are the drawbacks of a Friday deadline, but I was more pleased about the progress than I was concerned about the timing of my column.
Throughout the past week, I received a lot of mail – mostly the electronic kind – from readers celebrating this traffic triumph. They also questioned current road conditions and championed our ongoing investigations.
Here’s a glimpse into what they had to say.
Power of the people
My Dec. 14 column mentioned an article written by former South Tampa News editor Jennifer Howell at the end of 2004, in which she cited a Home Depot spokesman who said the aforementioned South Dale Mabry traffic light was “expected to take eight to 10 weeks to install.â€
Sometimes 10 weeks reads as 12 months on a loose city timeline.
One reader named Alice wrote in to explain that lobbying for the light began well before that, in 2003. That’s when Alice got into a serious car accident at the site outside the home-improvement store.
A week after her accident, a man on a motorcycle was killed at that same location. Prior to that, another South Tampa woman died there.
“There are so many accidents at the site that the city of Tampa police department leaves a tow truck on permanent call there,†Alice wrote in her recent e-mail.
She also explained Howell was “instrumental in asking readers to call the city if they had concerns with the intersection.â€
“The city of Tampa, at that point, denied there was a problem,†Alice wrote.
She said they were quickly overwhelmed with phone calls, and lobbied by both the Gandy and Golfview civic associations.
It may have taken a long time for the traffic signal to come into being, but this is still an excellent example of the power unified voices can wield.
Taking matters in hand
After reading my take on the cracked up intersection of MacDill Avenue and Azeele Street, Jerry Jennings expressed support for investigating the “deplorable condition of many of our Tampa roadways.â€
Formerly of Atlanta, Jennings wrote via e-mail that he finds it “very difficult to understand how the surface and turning conditions can be tolerated by a tax-paying public that certainly deserves better for the cost of living here.â€
I’ve wondered that myself. I suppose we sometimes get complacent, perhaps, or feel powerless to change things. It may take patience and time, and it may extract a good deal of frustration from our pores, but change is possible.
Got a major roadway problem in your neighborhood? Contact the city of Tampa Transportation Department at 274-8333 and tell them what’s going on.
The safety mantra
South Tampa News reader Marvin Pitts placed additional responsibility in the hands that grip the steering wheel, writing in to say that if more motorists would indulge in “driving and driving alone when behind the wheel, the roadway conditions would become secondary.â€
A valid point. It’s true that most drivers could stand to be more cautious, pay more attention and use an extra dash of common sense on the road.
I’ll start with me. You start with you. We’ll go from there.
More roadwork ahead
The first step is now under way in an initiative to convert several downtown streets from one-way to two-way thoroughfares.
Through the initiative, traffic flow on east-to-west oriented streets from Ashley Drive to Pierce Street will all be changed during the next five years to run two ways.
Madison Street is first on the conversion list. It was milled and repaved in November. City of Tampa Transportation estimates Madison Street project costs at $810,000. When finished, it and other east/west streets will feature decorative crosswalks and emphasize pedestrian accessibility at five major intersections.
Other improvements listed in the project include adding timed pedestrian signals, replacing traffic signs and repainting pavement markings.
Two of the northern lanes on Madison Street closed for construction as of Dec. 12. This first phase is expected to be complete in March 2006.
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).. To read more about local roadways or review past columns, go to TBO.com Keyword: Traffic.
Read Less...
Improvements Moving Way Below Speed Limit
Posted December 12, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:46 PM
There’s a lesson to be gleaned from my experiences writing this column: An answer is not always the same thing as a solution, especially when we’re talking city streets.
My search for information about the intersection of MacDill Avenue and Azeele Street has led to some answers, but the physical solution is going to take a little more patience.
Maybe a lot more.
A project to improve the crossing – plagued by poor road surface conditions and turning approaches – has been held up for almost two years with no definite end in sight.
A phone call came through from the city last week. Thomas Catell, chief project designer, said plans for the MacDill/Azeele project are complete and ready to go. The intersection is slated to receive left-turn lanes (but no corresponding arrow traffic signals) in all four directions.
Of course, work cannot start until all the necessary surrounding land is obtained, and a few parcels are missing from the puzzle.
“We’re still trying to reach agreements with some property owners,†Catell said.
If that doesn’t happen, the city could be forced to condemn properties and file for acquisition through eminent domain, making this whole process drag on even longer. Then there’s the construction to struggle through.
So, we have answers – yes, the intersection will improve – but for solutions in hard asphalt that make daily driving easier we can only wait.
Also under construction
This month, Tampa City Council approved a $10 million dollar contract to widen Manhattan Avenue from Gandy Boulevard to Euclid Avenue. The project will expand Manhattan to accommodate four lanes of north-south traffic and will also include creation of a center turn lane.
Looking for another example of answers vs. solutions, or ideas vs. actions? Discussion about this project, in one form or another, has been batted around for more than a decade.
Patience, it seems, is a prerequisite of progress.
Groundbreaking on the Manhattan Avenue widening project is officially set for 10:30 a.m. on Jan. 24.
Faulty ignition timing
As far back as October 2004, folks were waiting and hoping for a traffic light outside the Home Depot at South Dale Mabry Highway and Ballast Point Boulevard. That’s when former South Tampa News editor Jen Howell wrote a column about it, thinking perhaps it would be a New Year’s reality in early ‘05.
The light physically appeared a year later, unlit. And we’re still waiting for the juice to flow.
Alas, once again it seems time is not on our side. As of this writing, the poles and lamps still sit dark, covered in plastic.
Now I’m hoping TECO can shed a little light on this dangerous site in 2006.
So is Kathy Good Jenkins of Oakford Park. She sent me an e-mail last week wondering “what will it take for TECO and DOT to get these lamps lit, before somebody dies at that very dangerous South Dale Mabry intersection?â€
From what I’ve been told, it’s just a matter of having TECO and the Department of Transportation make final equipment inspections. After that, and about 72 hours of flashing test signals, the light can move into regular cycles.
I had hoped to see some movement around Halloween.
“Now Turkey Day has come and gone,†Jenkins wrote. “Sure, Christmas would be nice, but does even Santa have that much power? I’m thinking we should start lobbying the Easter Bunny, just in case.â€
The way things are moving right now, I’m inclined to agree.
Read Less...
City Roads Crying For Face Lifts
Posted December 06, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:56 PM
I want to start off with a clarification, and an apology.
In my push to complete last week’s column about an accident on Bay to Bay Boulevard, it seems I didn’t get all the facts straight.
The crash involved a red sedan and gold SUV colliding on Bay to Bay near South Esperanza Avenue. I described the sedan as pulling out of the Beach Park Academy II parking lot and attempting to head west by crossing oncoming traffic.
Two calls from the academy set me straight – the sedan was actually pulling out of Coyle Realty’s parking lot, directly next door to the day care.
I regret the error, and any confusion it has caused.
Road work ahead?
You can’t get behind the wheel without taking notice – our roads are sorely in need of some TLC. According to a recent city audit, at least half of Tampa’s street network is in need of repair. That’s more than 8,000 roadways.
More than 100 of those roads are in such poor condition parts of them are considered barely adequate for travel, and our own MacDill Avenue is in that Top 100.
Of particular note is the intersection at MacDill and Azeele Street. I mentioned it earlier this year in a column about high-incident traffic crash locations. At the time, the junction of MacDill and Azeele was among the Top 10 crash sites in Tampa.
It has since been knocked off the list, but the intersection clearly needs work. The road’s surface is pockmarked with holes, and many of the pavement markings are obscured.
A resurfacing and repainting could do more than enhance aesthetics and smoothen the ride – it could provide better stopping cues for drivers.
In a March 2003 story, Tampa Tribune reporter B.C. Manion wrote about city plans to improve safety at the intersection by adding turn lanes on all four approaches. At that time, city traffic engineer Debbie Herrington told Manion she expected the $750,000 road project to take about nine months.
Two-plus years later, I’m trying to find out what the hold up is all about.
Herrington and I played phone tag all week. She left me a message saying the city still plans to widen that intersection to include left turn lanes, but I didn’t find out anything about the delay. I’ll hit the phones again next week and see what turns up.
Meanwhile, I did get some input from local motorists. South Tampa resident Barbara Orban said her son was involved an accident at the MacDill/Azeele intersection in April 2003.
“Looking at the car, I thought he would’ve been killed,†Orban said. Fortunately, there were no fatalities, but the boy’s car flipped over and he spent time in the emergency room.
Orban, a faculty member at University of South Florida’s college of public health, would like to see a new traffic signal erected at the intersection.
“I just cannot believe the bad condition of these roads,†she said, adding that the traffic fatality rate in her former home city in southern California was “half of what it is in Tampa.â€
She said adjusting yellow lights to run longer could reduce red-light running, which often leads to accidents. Swapping out the intersection’s current traffic lights, which are outdated and hang low suspended from cables, could also help.
“One way to reduce crashes is to modernize traffic signals,†Orban said. “At certain points on this intersection, you can’t see these lights if you’re in the first car. This same accident could happen again.â€
Orban offered up statistics from the Federal Highway Administration that provide correlation between road improvements and fatality rate reductions.
Evaluations made by the administration found sight-distance improvements at intersections reduced fatalities by 56 percent over a 20-year period. New traffic signals reduced fatalities by 53 percent over that same time period, and addition of turning lanes led to a 47 percent drop over the years.
Every $100 million invested in highway safety improvements will result in approximately 145 fewer traffic fatalities over a 10-year period, the administration states online.
“They put in new traffic signals and changed markings on pavement (to renew California’s older roads),†Orban said. “Here it looks like they just don’t put much money into them at all.â€
More than $5 million is budgeted for city road repairs this fiscal year. Orban can’t wait to see them start using it.
Like most of us, she wants to see changes that will reduce the number of crashes.
Until then, drive carefully out there.
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Read Less...
Driving On A Collision Course
Posted December 01, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:47 PM
We were all quietly typing away when a strong, dull thud sounded from outside on Bay to Bay Boulevard. I don’t think anyone questioned what it was.
Here at the South Tampa News and The Tampa Tribune offices, we have long feared a car accident would occur on our doorstep. My co-workers have expressed surprise that it doesn’t happen more often, given the low visibility and high speeding rates along this part of the road.
It’s difficult to see clearly coming out of intersections and parking lots on our stretch of Bay to Bay, between Ferdinand and MacDill avenues. Many lots edge right up to the road, and within them parked cars and SUVs destroy lines of sight. Drivers often rush down Bay to Bay toward the Crosstown Expressway and Bayshore Boulevard, increasing the danger.
It was bound to happen. Considering the risks, I felt relieved the wreckage was not worse.
Here is what I’ve pieced together from observation and discussion:
A red sedan pulled out of the Beach Park Academy II parking lot on Bay to Bay and attempted to head west by crossing over two lanes of oncoming traffic. Unseen by the driver, a gold SUV was headed eastbound on Bay to Bay and collided into the sedan’s driver-side door. Both cars were heavily dented.
At the sound of impact, our South Tampa bureau chief jumped up to check on the victims. A Tribune reporter called 911 and pinpointed the location and vehicle descriptions for rescuers. Within three or four minutes, a fire truck, ambulance and police cruisers had arrived on scene.
No fatal injuries were sustained, but at the time of this writing on Nov. 23 the SUV driver was still in the hospital being treated for chest pains, possibly compounded by her seatbelt and airbag deployment.
The whole thing was all over in less than half an hour.
It has been awhile since I was so close to a traffic accident. The grim sound of collision and the fear on drivers’ strained faces brought a dangerous reality close to home. It’s easy to imagine myself in their situation, especially with the way people drive around here.
I would hope that any passing motorist unfortunate enough to bear witness to a crash might act with renewed respect for his or her vehicle’s power, but I know this is not always the case.
That same day, I was both cut off and tailgated in separate instances. Later, while headed east along Bay to Bay, I saw a motorist pull across the double yellow line and into oncoming traffic. In his hurry to turn left, he was edging into a turn lane designated for drivers on the opposite side of the road.
I avoided the blockage and kept going, not sure if I was angry, astonished or just plain scared. It’s amazing the things people will do in their cars.
As of April 2005, traffic counts listed Bay to Bay Boulevard as operating at a “C†level – crowded, but still under capacity. I was unable to obtain speed studies before publication. (Guess everyone else snuck out of work early the day before Thanksgiving.)
According to Tampa Police Traffic Unit, following too closely is the No. 1 cause of crashes, followed by speeding and drunk driving. They don’t have any categories named “obnoxious maneuver†or “cell phone violation†or “homicidal steering.â€
On the flip side – no pun intended – we must be doing something right. As of Nov. 22, South Tampa had completely ranked out of the Top 10 traffic crash locations in the city.
About a year ago we had two in the Top 10, which now includes intersections at Waters and Armenia avenues; Fowler Avenue and 30th Street; and Dale Mabry Highway and Hillsborough Avenue.
I feel like I keep repeating the same mantra on a weekly basis: “beeee saaaafe, beeee saaaafe, beeee saaaafe.â€
I’m not about to stop now.
Read Less...
Roads Through Developments Must Be Built
Posted November 15, 2005 by Penny Fletcher
Updated Nov 15, 2005 at 04:01 PM
There Must Be A Better Way To Keep Track Of Developers
Oct. 19 I ran a column titled, “In Search of the Responsible Parties.†Today’s column is an update to that.
The person – persons or companies – I’ve been searching for are the ones responsible for building the north-south roads within the new developments that front the east side of U.S. 301 in Riverview.
All the developers were required to leave room and right of way for these roadways. And if you drive through each development, from South Fork north almost to Rhodine Road, you can see that they line up in a such a way that they could be easily connected.
That would certainly relieve U.S. 301.
The problem is that nobody seems to be able to say exactly who must build what, where or when.
My quest began when I noticed that the address of my granddaughter’s school, the new Leroy Collins Elementary in Panther Trace, is 12424 Summerfield Blvd. But the school isn’t in Summerfield, or anywhere near Summerfield Boulevard, which ends at a wide field by Smokethorn Drive.
After at least 10 telephone calls to my regular sources for my Oct. 19 column, I got word from Kevin Howe, a senior manager with the county’s 911-Streets and Addresses, that his department had assigned the address because of a map sent to him by Hillsborough County’s Planning and Growth Management office.
He e-mailed me a copy and it clearly shows an extension of Summerfield Boulevard north-south in the exact area I’d been asking about – South Fork to Rhodine Road.
I soon found, however, that the road existing on Kevin’s map did not exist on the county’s 2025 Transportation Plan.
Did that mean private interests were building it? And had they been told to do this in connection with their permits?
This sounds like an easy question for county officials to answer, but so far, it hasn’t worked that way.
Calls to County Commissioner Ronda Storms’ office created a blitz of e-mail asking county officials to find an answer for me. And finally I interviewed Jo Ann Heron, a professional engineer in the department of planning and growth management, who said she has only been on the job a few months but seemed to do her best to find answers for me.
“U.S. Home donated the right of way for the section through Summerfield north of Collins elementary,†she said. “All the way to the Martinez tract. Then, when that tract is developed, there will be a park just north of the school that will also be on Summerfield Boulevard.â€
She went on to say that when the site plan was approved for Summerfield, the developer was required to “build roads within the development as they are needed.†Neither county commissioners nor the zoning hearing master attached any timetable so this could be when the last permit for the development is pulled, or perhaps – well, never, unless a “need†is proven, she said.
I soon found a second problem with this answer: Summerfield is south of Collins elementary, not north, so this meant we were talking about two completely different plots of land.
At this point, JoAnn advised that I ask Dennis Kline, the county’s principal planner, who was, she said, very knowledgeable about the U.S. 301 developments.
But not on this subject.
Dennis suggested (almost immediately) that I go to Tim Plate of Heidt & Associates, an engineering firm based in Tampa, because they were more familiar with the specifics and conditions than he was.
Now I don’t know why private industry should be more familiar with zoning conditions than our own county government, but Tim told me the only tract (in the area I was inquiring about) where zoning conditions have not already been set in stone is the Martinez tract, a 344-acre former dairy farm that extends north from Panther Trace to Rhodine Road.
Public records show that Transcend Development Corp. is requesting a rezoning of the Martinez tract to create a new development called Villages at Heron Lake. Transcend plans to build 1,134 single family homes and townhouses surrounding a 90-acre lake.
There’s still time to ask that the zoning hearing master make that section of north-south road a condition of its permit.
As for the section of land that contains the dedicated right of way in Panther Trace, building a road there is up to the “whim of its developer, RRG Big Bend based in Fort Pierce,†Tim said.
He said that he was certain that even though the right of way was dedicated, there was no requirement for RRG to build any road.
I want to know why these conditions aren’t being put on as a requirement of their permits, or perhaps when site plans are presented.
It’s true that a lot of South Shore’s zoning was established nearly 20 years ago. We may not be able to downgrade the number of homes that have already been allowed by previous county officials, but we can certainly ask our county commissioners to make planners put conditions on everything new that comes across their desks.
u I’d like to hear your comments on this, and other, issues. I realized I’ve done all the raving this week, which has left me no space for your letters. So next week we’re going to have a different kind of Road Raves, filled with comments from letters and e-mails I’ve received these past two weeks. And there’s still time to get your questions and comments in. Send them to 3036 College Ave., Ruskin, FL 33570 or e-mail them to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) with “Road Raves†in the subject line.
Penny Fletcher is the editor of The Sun and the South Shore News.
City Pipes Show Their Age
Posted November 08, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:47 PM
If weekly commutes bring you anywhere near the Platt Street bridge, you’ve probably seen the damage by now. A large-scale wastewater cave-in along the center lane of Platt Street has shut down the thoroughfare from Plant Avenue east to Bayshore Boulevard.
Repairs began around Nov. 7, and are expected to be complete sometime around Nov. 10 ... hopefully. If not, through traffic will continue to be detoured north on Plant Avenue to Kennedy Boulevard. Access to local businesses will be available via Plant Avenue to Cardy Street.
City representatives said the collapse was caused by failure of a 24-inch wastewater pipe. No wastewater overflowed from the cave-in and the wastewater system in the area is functioning properly.
Back in August, drivers felt a similar pain when part of Bayshore Boulevard caved in after leaky joints in an underground stormwater culvert box loosened dirt below the road’s surface. The road was shut down for days while crews worked diligently on repairs.
In a previous interview, Stormwater Director Chuck Walter said cave-ins occur on about a monthly basis throughout the city. We don’t hear about these collapses with much frequency because they often occur in backyards or other private areas.
Because of roadway and pipe system age, neighborhoods like South and West Tampa see the greatest stability problems. This summer, a wastewater pipeline cave-in near the intersection of Rivershore Drive and Sligh Avenue in central Tampa required the replacement of some 140 feet of pipe, spanning the entire width of Sligh. The original pipe was more than 50 years old.
Walter said the city’s stormwater department is developing a program to address citywide cave-in issues. It definitely seems to be time – if things continue in this manner, our system won’t make it past middle age.
Putting Responsibility In The Driver’s Seat
Posted November 07, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:48 PM
My recent column on safety issues surrounding the crosswalk at the foot of the Davis Islands bridge spurred a healthy response from locals, most of whom were crying out for a new solution.
Resident Linda Misner, who said her husband crosses that intersection daily while walking to and from work, feels the crosswalk’s placement is not the only problem – just the most obvious. “There is a bigger problem with drivers that speed over the bridge,†Misner wrote via e-mail. “These two things together create a huge safety issue. Currently there is nothing to slow these drivers down as they enter the island.â€
She suggested adding speed humps similar to those on the Harbor Island bridge. They make speeding near impossible on the entrance to that island, and hump placement forces motorists to stop at crosswalks.
Omar Medina of South Tampa offered a similar but slightly less imposing solution: rumble strips. In his e-mail to the South Tampa News, Medina said traffic at the bridge base “far exceeds posted speed,†and felt the strips could slow drivers down and alert them to possible dangers.
Signage dedicated to that purpose does exist on the inbound bridge. A yellow flashing light and two arrow signs indicate the upcoming crosswalk, allowing attentive motorists a chance to perk up and use caution.
William Porth, traffic analysis supervisor with the city of Tampa, was involved in the crosswalk installation project at this site in October 2004. He explained moving the crossing closer to the bridge base increased safety, marking a strong improvement over the previous crosswalk, a stretch that sat some 150 feet south at Adalia Avenue.
“Pedestrians could not see vehicles, nor could vehicles see pedestrians,†Porth said of the former crossing. “Now, pedestrians can see traffic on the bridge all the way to the hump some 700 feet back.â€
In addition to helping engineer the relocation and signage, Porth worked with area condo associations to trim oak trees and sea grapes near the bridge’s curve to provide a clearer view for drivers.
While he feels the situation was improved by these changes, Porth does agree “there’s really not a good place for a crosswalk there.â€
With resident density increasing on Davis Islands, and a new building almost complete at nearby Tampa General Hospital, he knows all too well that traffic is going to get worse.
“It’s a tough spot. It’s a tough situation,†Porth said. “I don’t personally see a solution to fixing that anytime soon, but we are continuing to observe the site for (safety) issues and possible future changes.â€
Unfortunately, it is not likely that speed humps or rumble strips will be among those changes. High inbound car volume on Bayshore Boulevard and Hyde Park Avenue classifies the Davis Islands bridge as a collector road, carrying too much traffic to qualify for calming devices.
Sounds a bit contradictory perhaps, but that’s how it works. Think of it this way: Take a street that supports a lot of cars back and forth everyday, cruising at speeds of about 35 miles per hour. Adding speed humps slows them down, but the number of vehicles does not change. Now, watch said cars begin backing up father down the road than the eye can see.
Porth said the point of entry from bridge onto island was studied with radar guns a few years back, and no excessive speeding was found. Drivers were clocked at somewhere around 37 miles per hour.
Again, Porth understands the concern, describing Hyde Park Avenue from Cleveland or Platt streets as feeling “kind of like a runway.â€
“It lends itself well to driving fast, until you hit the bridge,†he said. “The sign there says 30 miles per hour. Prudent people slow down and come to an appropriate speed in that area,†he said, although agreeing pedestrians may perceive the cars as going faster than someone on foot might like.
“In a perfect world, we would have a sidewalk running down that whole side (of the bridge) all the way over to Bayshore,†Porth said.
But construction of a new sidewalk along that inbound lane would be a precarious undertaking, requiring a new bridge edge, new railing, and other improvements to the tune of millions.
I won’t hold my breath.
Porth pointed out that no pedestrian-to-vehicle crashes have occurred at the bridge base since the crosswalk was installed. Let’s hope it stays that way.
As conscientious drivers, we can do our part by taking care to put down the cell phones, slow down, and watch the road.
Be safe out there.
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Read Less...
Cruising Through This Island Life
Posted November 07, 2005 by Mitzi Gordon
Updated Feb 14, 2006 at 03:48 PM
My new apartment building is aptly named: “Island Paradise.â€
It’s hard to argue with that while stepping out the door to enjoy cool breezes off the water, parks and restaurants within walking distance, and the generally quiet streets of Davis Islands.
I say “generally†because the new digs are relatively close to the island’s business district, which brings in outside motorists and gets noisier on weekends, when bands sometimes play in courtyards along the strip.
There is traffic trouble in paradise, too, at times. On-street parking, carefree pedestrians, speeding commuters and perilous crosswalks along Davis Boulevard all offer obstacles to the neighborhood tranquility.
Here are a few issues I’ve noticed in my short time as a resident of this fine community:
To begin with the basics, most of the roads are all beautifully paved and free of any bumpy patchwork like that found on Bay to Bay Boulevard or other ravaged South Tampa roadways. One exception I’ve noted is along the northern end of Danube Avenue, where the street surface appears to have gone untouched since the mid-1960s. It could use some work.
As I mentioned, there is some noise from the business district on weekends, but it’s negligible – couldn’t put a dent in Ybor’s deafening decibel levels. It’s actually nice to have some nightlife nearby.
But sadly, the area is not immune to the boom car phenomenon. There are fewer on the island than there were in my old neighborhood near Waters and Florida avenues, but what residents lack in quantity they make up for in quality. Last week, I saw the biggest, shiniest boom truck I have ever laid eyes on. The reverberating bass was deep and rich. The undercarriage twinkled with neon purple flashes of light. It was a real piece of work – and just as annoying as the rustier rigs in my old hood.
Moving on to weightier issues, reader Bill Tripp of Blanca Avenue sent in his concerns about the hazardous pedestrian crosswalk at the bottom of the bridge leading onto the island. As drivers move across the bridge, whether entering from Bayshore or Hyde Park boulevards, they usually speed up to merge with other vehicles. Vision is restricted by a curve in the road, and you hardly know the crosswalk is there until you’re on top of it. It’s a dangerous situation for all involved.
“To slow or stop for pedestrians crossing here is to invite a rear-end crash due to poor visibility,†Tripp wrote. “Many cars are exceeding the safe speed limit due to the down slope. This should be treated as an urgent high-priority problem.â€
Davis Islands Civic Association vice president Denise Cassedy has been active in the community for many years, working to develop long-range plans for dealing with traffic tangles and other problems. She said the city’s relocation of this pedestrian crossing in 2004 – when it was moved closer to the bottom of the bridge – did help those on foot to better see oncoming cars. But there’s still a catch.
“They extended the sidewalk up a little bit so that you can actually see oncoming traffic (if you’re walking), but unfortunately, the traffic really can’t see you,†Cassedy said. “It gives you a false sense of security. I think the city knows it wasn’t the best solution, but I don’t know where else they can put crosswalks there.â€
She agrees people are inclined to speed over the entrance bridge, but hopes a new lighting project might slow things down a bit. Her self-professed “pet project†of three years, this involves adding “up lighting†to trees along the main median of Davis Boulevard.
Karen Cashin with the city of Tampa parks and recreation department described the project as primarily “aesthetic.†However, any bit of light that allows cars to see better as they drive onto the island is helpful, she added.
The city has already purchased lights to be set at ground level and shined up into the trees as accent illumination. Cashin is still working the project through permitting process, complicated by the median’s split between city parkland and right of way. She hopes to have the red tape untangled and the lights in the ground by Christmas.
While this will offer an ambient glow that could help pedestrian visibility, Cashin doesn’t see the project as a solution to the bridge-and-crosswalk problem.
Alas, it seems no one has an ideal solution right now. To make things truly safe, the city would probably have to purchase or receive easement from one of the nearby condominiums, and run the crosswalk under the entrance bridge. Otherwise, the path would have to run much farther south on Davis Boulevard. Neither idea is going to be deemed practical, nor likely to happen any time soon.
I was unable to reach a city of Tampa traffic safety engineer for comment before press time, but crosswalks such as these generally fall within their jurisdiction. If you would like to throw in your two cents, give them a call at the Public Works Department, 274-8721. It can’t hurt to have more people addressing the dangers. Also, you can make requests for new sidewalks and sidewalk repair by calling 274-8333.
Another viable but slightly more complicated option is to visit www.tampagov.net and click on the link to the Customer Service Center in the upper left hand corner. When the page pops up, hit the “A to Z listing†link, then click on “S†and scroll down to “Street Marking Request,†selecting either “new†or “repair.†Then you get to fill out a form. Whew.
I recommend just picking up the phone.
Meanwhile, I’ve run a bit long-winded, but will take up further Davis Islands discourse in an upcoming column. In noting these issues it is not my intention to complain – merely to inform and assist. I would like to hear more of your concerns.
Send me e-mail sometime, and let me know if you think I’m “right on,†or just off my rocker.
Send rants and raves about South Tampa traffic to Mitzi Gordon at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Read Less...