tools

TBO.com > Tools

Congestion? I Give Up


No less a publication than the New York Times Magazine ( .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) but the full article costs $3.95) has ventured into a somewhat scary area of traffic theory _ that when congestion gets to a certain point, there really isn’t much we can do about it.

Unless, that is, ““we have a lot of money.

California was first, but the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area is close behind, in the development of ““automated express toll lanes.’’ These things are an additional lane, sometimes built and run by private entities, where the well-heeled can buy themselves out of gridlock. Onboard transponders automatically charge the motorist as much as $30 for a 50-mile run around the stalled, fuming masses.

Actual rates vary depending on how bad the traffic jam actually is, as measured by sensors on the roadway.

Gridlock here, one presumes, is not yet quite bad enough for there to be big enough money in the prospect of adding lanes to I-4 or I-275 for an entrepreneur to start building highway lanes and charging for their use. But our traffic woes are getting worse pretty quickly, and the state Department of Transportation has pretty well conceded it can’t keep up.

Sustained, even worsening, gridlock is of course is essential to assure a good return on the entrepreneur’s investment.

Then comes the question of who enforces the exclusivity of these lanes, although for the most part now they are separated by concrete barriers and access to them is limited to those with transponders.

But somehow the whole concept seems ... You fill in the blank.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

This Just In ...


TAMPA—The northbound I-275 exit ramp to Scott Street (Exit 44) has REOPENED.  This ramp had been closed where the ramps splits to Ashley Drive since July 17, 2005 for I-275 construction work in that area.
______________________________

 

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The High Cost of Free Parking


  A book appeared on my desk this morning, a heavy one, with the above title. Turns out it came from Tribune Staffer Mark Holan, who covers Hillsborough County for Ma Trib.  It’s by Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at UCLA.
  The book, all 733 pages of it _ I’ll read it and get back to you. Right. _ explores the premise that free parking, or cheap parking, are neither free nor cheap. Each of those spaces, says Shoup, costs way more than the average car, first to the developer, then to tenants, and then, in the form of higher prices for goods and services, to us. And zoning codes require all manner of off-street spaces _ 1.5 per nozzle at a gas station, 10 per daily funeral at a mauseleum _ based on peak demand, in places that lack public transit or pedestrian-friendly amenities.
  Shoup recommends ending the requirement that developers provide off-street parking;  charging fair market prices for curb parking; and, using the revenue from curb parking to pay for neighborhood improvements in the neighborhood that generates the revenue.
  I guess the theory is that expensive parking would increase the demand for mass transit, and places would look a lot better without so many garages and poorly maintained remote lots. Sounds radical, but maybe I should read the book.
   

(2) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Here Goes The Commute


I cover commuting issues for The Tampa Tribune. This web log is designed to help, or at least provide a forum for us, to help each other.

Ask questions. We’ll try to find answers. We can share safety tips, shortcuts, areas to avoid, better routes, ways to save money, save gas - to better survive the daily grind.

We spend a lot of time in our cars. What do we do with that time? Has your commute affected other areas of your life? Your budget?

Share with me where you drive each day, how long it takes you - now, compared to a few years ago. Tell us how you cope with traffic, how you like your carpool, van pool, your bus commute - if you’re among the few who can, or are willing to, live without your car during the work day.

Maybe we can ease the burden of our ever-lengthening commute.

For information before heading out on your commute, check TBO.com’s Traffic page at http://traffic.tbo.com.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Starting ‘06 In High Gear, With High Hopes


So far, it seems the year is off to a strong start. Density is increasing downtown, city public-art projects are abounding and road improvements are in the works both on the drawing board and on hard ground.

First off the block is the Manhattan Avenue widening project. This $9.3 million job will widen the two-lane road to five lanes (two northbound, two southbound and one center-turn lane) along the stretch between Euclid Avenue and Gandy Boulevard.

It’s hoped the construction, expected to take about 18 months, will ease congestion and reduce flooding, as a new stormwater system and retention pond also will be installed.

(1) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Rolling Forward Into Another Year


It’s about that time again, if you can believe it. Folks are gearing up to celebrate another New Year’s Eve.

In the spirit of recollection and review that has settled over the South Tampa News, I’m taking a quick look both ways before I cross into the coming year.

Here are a few excerpts from our 2005 adventures on the road:



* After piles of petitions and vociferous complaints, Swann Estates residents received approval in spring 2005 for the installation of speed tables along Swann Avenue between Lois and Church avenues. A transportation study listed the Swann Avenue site among the city’s 64 worst speeding locations.
We keep pulling out the Band-Aids as growth continues.



* The Kennedy Boulevard Bridge was torn down and replaced with a smooth road designed to allow all Lee Roy Selmon Expressway lanes to unload directly onto Meridian Avenue.
The throughway was slated to reopen in May, but to this day is still blocked off, due in part to closures necessitated by rampant condo construction in the Channel District.


(1) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Interstate Guardrails Are Positioned For Safety


Problems at some of South Shore’s Interstate 75 exit ramps have prompted enough letters I thought I’d devote a whole column to the subject.
Although I’ve received letters about long lines at the entrance ramps in the past, my recent column, “Crash Underscores Point of Telling Others Your Plans,” about a car that flipped 500 feet into the trees at the Sun City Center exit has prompted questions about guardrails on the ramps.
“I wish you would do a followup on your column (about the crash) because I cannot figure out why the Florida Department of Transportation allowed the guardrails to be installed on the wrong side of the roadway at Exit 240A (Sun City Center),” said Henry Niemczyk of Sun City Center. “Had the guardrails been installed correctly this incident might have been a minor traffic accident instead of a loss of two lives.”
Traffic backups also are questioned, as pointed out in a letter from Apollo Beach resident Randall Hunter.
“I believe that much congestion and many accidents could be prevented by two-laning the southbound exit ramp from I-75 onto Big Bend Road. During rush-hour traffic, cars back up onto the southbound traffic lane (of the interstate) resulting in major problems. The ramp is already fairly wide and could be easily widened. Shortening the median strip on Big Bend Road as you turn west would complete the fix,” Hunter said.
Other letters reflected similar questions about exit ramps at Gibsonton Drive, Big Bend Road, Apollo Beach/Riverview and Ruskin/Sun City Center, so I called FDOT’s spokeswoman Kris Carson. She put me in touch with the man with the answers – Dwayne Kile, FDOT’s district design engineer.
Guardrails are placed with the intention of deflecting out-of-control cars back onto the road, Kile explained.
Getting a car to ricochet back into its lane instead of running off the road can improve the safety of those in that car, but could also endanger other cars, if they get in the way.
“That’s why we can’t put guardrails in some places, like the left-hand side of 240A (the Sun City Center exit),” Kile said. “Yes, a car went off and landed in the trees. But the speed limit there is posted at 25 mph.”
To have gone 500 feet into the trees, the car must have been going over the posted speed limit, he said.
“We must look at all the possible angles (for a crash) and then make the best decision,” he explained. “The left side (of Exit 240 A at Sun City Center where the car went into the trees) is large and grassy. There are no houses. No roads. If we had the guardrail on the both sides, an out-of-control car could deflect back and forth causing multiple cars to lose control and flip. If it was on the opposite side (the right side as suggested in Niemczyk ‘s letter), out-of-control cars would be propelled at at an angle that would push them across lanes of traffic exiting the interstate,” he explained.
As for the Big Bend Road exit question, Kile said many places in northern Hillsborough County, especially at Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, have the same long backup problem.
“We realize this is an issue,” Kile said. “But Florida statutes say that 80 percent of our existing roadways must be maintained – resurfacing, fixing potholes and other conditions – before we can use any of our funds on new projects.”
A maintenance criteria rating system determines the status of this, he said.
“Then, if we have extra money, we can make improvements, start new projects. Or, if we can get private funds – like the (U.S.) 301 widening project,” Kile said.
That project got started 15 years ahead of schedule because of funds from developers who wanted to build homes along U.S. 301 but couldn’t until traffic studies supported it.
I use the Gibsonton Drive, Big Bend Road, and Ruskin/Sun City Center exits just about every day. I see accidents near the ramps all the time. But I see them other places too, mostly at crossing sites along U.S. 301.
The way I see it, after living almost 30 years in South Shore, is that there are just too many people moving in at once. The housing for them is being built based on zoning densities that were permitted in the 1960s and ’70s. Despite what many people think, county commissioners aren’t assigning these high growth densities now.
Many of the communities now being built have even lowered the densities on the original land use permits (or have been forced to lower them) by county commissioners or the zoning hearing master when residents make a fuss about overcrowding.
The only thing people can do about projects already on the books is to monitor any zoning or site-plan modifications. Those are the yellow signs you see everywhere you look that give hearing dates and project ID numbers.
We must remember that a lot of the plans for developments now in progress were “set in stone” during the era preceding the arrest of three county commissioners – in 1983 – who were led from the county courthouse in handcuffs, and later convicted for taking bribes.
Now, as in northern Hillsborough County, development has overloaded our schools, roads and other infrastructure.
After all, who wouldn’t want to live here? The weather’s great. The wages may be low, but there are plenty of jobs, and the lifestyle here is a whole a lot better than shoveling snow in the frozen North.
We’ll either have to get used to the growth or move out. That’s just the way it is.
u Send your questions and comments for inclusion in this column to 3036 College Ave., Ruskin, FL 33570 or e-mail them to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Penny Fletcher is the editor of The Sun and the South Shore News. 

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Readers Share Thoughts On The Road


The ink was scarcely dry on last week’s Traffic Stop column when I discovered the light at South Dale Mabry Highway and Ballast Point Boulevard had been lit, at long last.

These are the drawbacks of a Friday deadline, but I was more pleased about the progress than I was concerned about the timing of my column.

Throughout the past week, I received a lot of mail – mostly the electronic kind – from readers celebrating this traffic triumph. They also questioned current road conditions and championed our ongoing investigations.

Here’s a glimpse into what they had to say.



Power of the people

My Dec. 14 column mentioned an article written by former South Tampa News editor Jennifer Howell at the end of 2004, in which she cited a Home Depot spokesman who said the aforementioned South Dale Mabry traffic light was “expected to take eight to 10 weeks to install.”

Sometimes 10 weeks reads as 12 months on a loose city timeline.

One reader named Alice wrote in to explain that lobbying for the light began well before that, in 2003. That’s when Alice got into a serious car accident at the site outside the home-improvement store.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Improvements Moving Way Below Speed Limit


There’s a lesson to be gleaned from my experiences writing this column: An answer is not always the same thing as a solution, especially when we’re talking city streets.

My search for information about the intersection of MacDill Avenue and Azeele Street has led to some answers, but the physical solution is going to take a little more patience.

Maybe a lot more.

A project to improve the crossing – plagued by poor road surface conditions and turning approaches – has been held up for almost two years with no definite end in sight.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

City Roads Crying For Face Lifts


I want to start off with a clarification, and an apology.

In my push to complete last week’s column about an accident on Bay to Bay Boulevard, it seems I didn’t get all the facts straight.

The crash involved a red sedan and gold SUV colliding on Bay to Bay near South Esperanza Avenue. I described the sedan as pulling out of the Beach Park Academy II parking lot and attempting to head west by crossing oncoming traffic.

Two calls from the academy set me straight – the sedan was actually pulling out of Coyle Realty’s parking lot, directly next door to the day care.

I regret the error, and any confusion it has caused.


Road work ahead?

You can’t get behind the wheel without taking notice – our roads are sorely in need of some TLC. According to a recent city audit, at least half of Tampa’s street network is in need of repair. That’s more than 8,000 roadways.

More than 100 of those roads are in such poor condition parts of them are considered barely adequate for travel, and our own MacDill Avenue is in that Top 100.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Driving On A Collision Course


We were all quietly typing away when a strong, dull thud sounded from outside on Bay to Bay Boulevard. I don’t think anyone questioned what it was.

Here at the South Tampa News and The Tampa Tribune offices, we have long feared a car accident would occur on our doorstep. My co-workers have expressed surprise that it doesn’t happen more often, given the low visibility and high speeding rates along this part of the road.

It’s difficult to see clearly coming out of intersections and parking lots on our stretch of Bay to Bay, between Ferdinand and MacDill avenues. Many lots edge right up to the road, and within them parked cars and SUVs destroy lines of sight. Drivers often rush down Bay to Bay toward the Crosstown Expressway and Bayshore Boulevard, increasing the danger.

It was bound to happen. Considering the risks, I felt relieved the wreckage was not worse.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Roads Through Developments Must Be Built


There Must Be A Better Way To Keep Track Of Developers
Oct. 19 I ran a column titled, “In Search of the Responsible Parties.” Today’s column is an update to that.
The person – persons or companies – I’ve been searching for are the ones responsible for building the north-south roads within the new developments that front the east side of U.S. 301 in Riverview.
All the developers were required to leave room and right of way for these roadways. And if you drive through each development, from South Fork north almost to Rhodine Road, you can see that they line up in a such a way that they could be easily connected.
That would certainly relieve U.S. 301.
The problem is that nobody seems to be able to say exactly who must build what, where or when.
My quest began when I noticed that the address of my granddaughter’s school, the new Leroy Collins Elementary in Panther Trace, is 12424 Summerfield Blvd. But the school isn’t in Summerfield, or anywhere near Summerfield Boulevard, which ends at a wide field by Smokethorn Drive.
After at least 10 telephone calls to my regular sources for my Oct. 19 column, I got word from Kevin Howe, a senior manager with the county’s 911-Streets and Addresses, that his department had assigned the address because of a map sent to him by Hillsborough County’s Planning and Growth Management office.
He e-mailed me a copy and it clearly shows an extension of Summerfield Boulevard north-south in the exact area I’d been asking about – South Fork to Rhodine Road.
I soon found, however, that the road existing on Kevin’s map did not exist on the county’s 2025 Transportation Plan.
Did that mean private interests were building it? And had they been told to do this in connection with their permits?
This sounds like an easy question for county officials to answer, but so far, it hasn’t worked that way.
Calls to County Commissioner Ronda Storms’ office created a blitz of e-mail asking county officials to find an answer for me. And finally I interviewed Jo Ann Heron, a professional engineer in the department of planning and growth management, who said she has only been on the job a few months but seemed to do her best to find answers for me.
“U.S. Home donated the right of way for the section through Summerfield north of Collins elementary,” she said. “All the way to the Martinez tract. Then, when that tract is developed, there will be a park just north of the school that will also be on Summerfield Boulevard.”
She went on to say that when the site plan was approved for Summerfield, the developer was required to “build roads within the development as they are needed.” Neither county commissioners nor the zoning hearing master attached any timetable so this could be when the last permit for the development is pulled, or perhaps – well, never, unless a “need” is proven, she said.
I soon found a second problem with this answer: Summerfield is south of Collins elementary, not north, so this meant we were talking about two completely different plots of land.
At this point, JoAnn advised that I ask Dennis Kline, the county’s principal planner, who was, she said, very knowledgeable about the U.S. 301 developments.
But not on this subject.
Dennis suggested (almost immediately) that I go to Tim Plate of Heidt & Associates, an engineering firm based in Tampa, because they were more familiar with the specifics and conditions than he was.
Now I don’t know why private industry should be more familiar with zoning conditions than our own county government, but Tim told me the only tract (in the area I was inquiring about) where zoning conditions have not already been set in stone is the Martinez tract, a 344-acre former dairy farm that extends north from Panther Trace to Rhodine Road.
Public records show that Transcend Development Corp. is requesting a rezoning of the Martinez tract to create a new development called Villages at Heron Lake. Transcend plans to build 1,134 single family homes and townhouses surrounding a 90-acre lake.
There’s still time to ask that the zoning hearing master make that section of north-south road a condition of its permit.
As for the section of land that contains the dedicated right of way in Panther Trace, building a road there is up to the “whim of its developer, RRG Big Bend based in Fort Pierce,” Tim said. 
He said that he was certain that even though the right of way was dedicated, there was no requirement for RRG to build any road.
I want to know why these conditions aren’t being put on as a requirement of their permits, or perhaps when site plans are presented.
It’s true that a lot of South Shore’s zoning was established nearly 20 years ago. We may not be able to downgrade the number of homes that have already been allowed by previous county officials, but we can certainly ask our county commissioners to make planners put conditions on everything new that comes across their desks.
u I’d like to hear your comments on this, and other, issues. I realized I’ve done all the raving this week, which has left me no space for your letters. So next week we’re going to have a different kind of Road Raves, filled with comments from letters and e-mails I’ve received these past two weeks. And there’s still time to get your questions and comments in. Send them to 3036 College Ave., Ruskin, FL 33570 or e-mail them to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) with “Road Raves” in the subject line.
Penny Fletcher is the editor of The Sun and the South Shore News.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

City Pipes Show Their Age


If weekly commutes bring you anywhere near the Platt Street bridge, you’ve probably seen the damage by now. A large-scale wastewater cave-in along the center lane of Platt Street has shut down the thoroughfare from Plant Avenue east to Bayshore Boulevard.

Repairs began around Nov. 7, and are expected to be complete sometime around Nov. 10 ... hopefully. If not, through traffic will continue to be detoured north on Plant Avenue to Kennedy Boulevard. Access to local businesses will be available via Plant Avenue to Cardy Street.

City representatives said the collapse was caused by failure of a 24-inch wastewater pipe. No wastewater overflowed from the cave-in and the wastewater system in the area is functioning properly. 

Back in August, drivers felt a similar pain when part of Bayshore Boulevard caved in after leaky joints in an underground stormwater culvert box loosened dirt below the road’s surface. The road was shut down for days while crews worked diligently on repairs.

In a previous interview, Stormwater Director Chuck Walter said cave-ins occur on about a monthly basis throughout the city. We don’t hear about these collapses with much frequency because they often occur in backyards or other private areas.

Because of roadway and pipe system age, neighborhoods like South and West Tampa see the greatest stability problems. This summer, a wastewater pipeline cave-in near the intersection of Rivershore Drive and Sligh Avenue in central Tampa required the replacement of some 140 feet of pipe, spanning the entire width of Sligh. The original pipe was more than 50 years old.

Walter said the city’s stormwater department is developing a program to address citywide cave-in issues. It definitely seems to be time – if things continue in this manner, our system won’t make it past middle age.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Putting Responsibility In The Driver’s Seat


My recent column on safety issues surrounding the crosswalk at the foot of the Davis Islands bridge spurred a healthy response from locals, most of whom were crying out for a new solution.

Resident Linda Misner, who said her husband crosses that intersection daily while walking to and from work, feels the crosswalk’s placement is not the only problem – just the most obvious. “There is a bigger problem with drivers that speed over the bridge,” Misner wrote via e-mail. “These two things together create a huge safety issue. Currently there is nothing to slow these drivers down as they enter the island.”

She suggested adding speed humps similar to those on the Harbor Island bridge. They make speeding near impossible on the entrance to that island, and hump placement forces motorists to stop at crosswalks.

Omar Medina of South Tampa offered a similar but slightly less imposing solution: rumble strips. In his e-mail to the South Tampa News, Medina said traffic at the bridge base “far exceeds posted speed,” and felt the strips could slow drivers down and alert them to possible dangers.

Signage dedicated to that purpose does exist on the inbound bridge. A yellow flashing light and two arrow signs indicate the upcoming crosswalk, allowing attentive motorists a chance to perk up and use caution.

William Porth, traffic analysis supervisor with the city of Tampa, was involved in the crosswalk installation project at this site in October 2004. He explained moving the crossing closer to the bridge base increased safety, marking a strong improvement over the previous crosswalk, a stretch that sat some 150 feet south at Adalia Avenue.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Cruising Through This Island Life


My new apartment building is aptly named: “Island Paradise.”

It’s hard to argue with that while stepping out the door to enjoy cool breezes off the water, parks and restaurants within walking distance, and the generally quiet streets of Davis Islands.

I say “generally” because the new digs are relatively close to the island’s business district, which brings in outside motorists and gets noisier on weekends, when bands sometimes play in courtyards along the strip.

There is traffic trouble in paradise, too, at times. On-street parking, carefree pedestrians, speeding commuters and perilous crosswalks along Davis Boulevard all offer obstacles to the neighborhood tranquility.

(0) Comments AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Page 29 of 30 pages « First  <  27 28 29 30 >

Advertisement

Write a letter to the editor | Subscribe and get two weeks free | Place an Ad Online

Site Tools

RSS Feeds:
XML Feed for this channel
All feeds/RSS FAQ



ADVERTISEMENT

Advertise With Us:
Online | In Print | Broadcast