MORE
Most Recent Entries
- Having SEC Tournament In Tampa "Extra Strange" (So Says One Guy)
- T.O. Proves It Takes More Than Talent
- Did Bucs Way Overpay For Winslow?
- What Planet Does Scott Boras Live On?
- Driver Beware: Take It Slow In Port Charlotte
- Readers React To A-Rod
- Character Counts In Rays Clubhouse
- Bucs Caught A Break By Not Getting Favre
- The Fallout From A-Rod Bombshell Continues
- Situation Normal With Yankees: Chaos
- Recruiting Insanity Strikes Again
- Up Next - Spring Training
- Selig Hints At Earlier Post-Season Start Times
- All In The Family: Mark McGwire-Style
- Morris May Be Inexperienced, But That's The Trend
Monthly Archives
Forum: Talk Sports
|
You know a football program has really arrived when fans start grumbling about the head coach, and that is beginning to happen at USF. Tribune blog buddy Brett McMurphy generated a large response to his blog about the state of the Bulls following consecutive losses at Louisville and Cincinnati.
Here’s 2 cents more on that subject.
While I believe Jim Leavitt has generally done an outstanding job of building a program from the ground up and becoming a recognized name on the national scene, this Bulls season has been a flop to this point and that comes back on the head coach. The Bulls didn’t handle success well last season after rising to No. 2 in the nation, particularly in a meltdown at Rutgers (USF’s next opponent) in which Leavitt seemed paralyzed by the moment. He has become a total control freak as well, which doesn’t make him different from most college coaches but does leave him holding the bag when things go sour.
The Bulls’ play actually reflects Leavitt’s personality - intense, high-energy, capable of great moments, but also erratic and out of control.
USF should be way better this season and that’s on Leavitt. The Bulls returned 17 starters from a year ago, including quarterback Matt Grothe. The Big East is about as weak as it ever will be and the Bulls were about as loaded as they ever will be. If fans are upset, well, they should be.
Once you establish that you have the ability to play on the big stage, as USF did, people won’t be happy with anything less. Just as Phil Fulmer or Tommy Tuberville (who is feeling the heat at Auburn despite long-term success there). That doesn’t mean that Leavitt will suffer Fulmer’s fate, of course, nor should he. It does mean that fans are a fickle lot with high expectations and short memories.
RAYS RUMORS: The New York Post is reporting the Mets have interest in the Rays’ pitching. Depending which story you read, they’re either looking at Edwin Jackson or, to expand things a bit, Jackson and Andy Sonnanstine.
I make this safe prediction: This won’t be the last time we hear that “Team X” is focused on trading for pitching from the Rays. The general belief is that Jackson is the one most likely to be moved, if the Rays make a move, and he would be attractive - a 14-game winner with a power arm. He’ll also be expensive, as would Sonnanstine.
Posted by Joseph Dunn, Sarasota on 11/09 at 01:21 PM
Don G the OTHER article on tbo.com about the Bulls had a HUGE response and it seems that many fans are concerned about the coaching as well. I have not paid close attention to the comings and goings of assistants but it seems that they have a hard time dealing with Jim and/or the ones they have are not of top quality.
Posted by Don G, Madeira Beach, FL on 11/07 at 09:52 PM
Joe, I’m one of the disappointed USF fans & blogger to Brett. Thanks for your article, as too many hard-core USF fans are in denile about Leavitt and the poor coaching from his assistants. Your bottomline is about what the rest of us are saying: 17 starters returned and after playing in 3 bowl games (1-2), much was expected of USF this season. When a team has that kind of returning talent and now has adequent bowl experience, it falls on the coaching. Change is needed. What change was required will take incremental steps in order to determine who’s the problem.
Posted by Joseph Dunn, Sarasota on 11/06 at 03:56 PM
The blame MUST fall at least partly on the head coach. This is not a disciplined group of players and they are not making the key plays when they count.
I hope Jim looks at this as a wake-up call and SOMETHING changes. He is too good a coach to be going through this.
It did look like this was OUR YEAR….. not gonna happen…. ;-((
Advertisement
Send Us Your Comments |
Terms & Conditions |
* Comments Must Include Full Name And Location

Posted by Don G, Madeira Beach, FL on 11/10 at 11:40 PM
Joseph, yeah, I think some of the problem is with the assistant coaches as well. I’ve been a little critical of the offense & offensive coordinator, Greg Gregory re: offensive inconsistency and lack of a decent red zone execution. Of course, large numbers of penalties have hurt, but as the “other” TBO article pointed out, penalties have been an issue with this team since NCAA has kept records (8yrs). Only common factor at USF during those 8-yrs is Leavitt. If they win 2 out of last 3 and go 8-4, then I say Leavitt & gang get another chance. However, if they lose to 2 of 3 or all 3, then some coaching changes must be made prior to next season, in my opinion.