Breaking Tampa Bay, Florida and national news and weather from Tampa Bay Online and The Tampa Tribune | TBO.com
  • Home

Rays say they have payroll flexibility

Posted Nov 27, 2007 by Marc Lancaster

Updated Nov 27, 2007 at 06:35 PM

The Rays have yet to make a significant move this off-season, but Andrew Friedman said today that there is some wiggle room in the projected 2008 payroll figure owner Stuart Sternberg floated toward the end of the regular season. That would be in the low $30 millions, as best as we could determine.

“I think there’s a scenario in which that’s what it is; I think there’s a scenario in which it’s higher,” Friedman said. “It’ll get back to the types of players that are available to us and how they fit us. I think it will always be difficult as long as Stuart is the owner to pin down the [payroll] number on Nov. 27 of any year because of how dependent it is on the specific player or players that are available.”

Friedman talked about being opportunistic, which of course has been the mantra for this group from the beginning, and obviously there is a limit somewhere for the payroll—it isn’t going to double. But if they found something that made sense—my guess is it would more likely come in a trade for a player with a decent-sized contract or who is slated to make good money in arbitration the next few years rather than a free-agent signing—I think they’d be inclined to do it.

“If the right player comes along, whether it be in a trade or as a free agent, that puts us over by a million dollars or two million dollars what our upper limit is, we’ll view that kind of independent of anything else,” said Friedman. “But you also have to factor in that as you do that, you’re just depleting what you can do the next year and the next year. All this money is fungible and it all will go into keeping our own players. It just gets to roster flexibility and how important it is for a lower-revenue team.”

Looking ahead to the winter meetings, Friedman reemphasized the importance of improving defensively (most likely starting with whoever they bring in to play shortstop) and reiterated the need to shore up the bullpen. He also indicated perhaps a bit more strongly than he has this fall that the Rays might be looking to add a starting pitcher.

“While our focus is on the bullpen,” said Friedman, “if we’re able to acquire a starter who leapfrogs over some of our guys, obviously it strengthens our rotation, but in turn it also strengthens our bullpen because of the trickle-down effect of a guy or two that we may push down into the bullpen. It’ll be dependent on who that guy is, how he fits, but it’s certainly a possibility.”

Again, my guess would be that move would be made through trade rather than giving a ridiculous contract to Carlos Silva or Kyle Lohse to be, at absolute best, the No. 3 starter. As for the Boof Bonser rumors making the rounds, it’s my understanding that there’s nothing to them.

Reader Comments

Por (Dave) on November 27, 2007 (Suggest removal)

The Rays need to package 3-4 prospects and send them to the A’s for Dan Haren!  He would fit into the Rays’ budget for the next three years and significantly improve the rotation.

Suggest removal

Por (Wayne Licwov) on November 27, 2007 (Suggest removal)

This talk about being limited because it’s a lower-revenue team is self-fulfilling. It’s up to a wise management to find ways to increase that revenue. It’s not like the Tampa Bay area is a little hick town with no people.
When will they ever see that it is their job as management to bring in the veteran players that will create a winning team that will draw the fans out that will make it a higher-revenue team.
The first move is up to them, not the fans.

Suggest removal

Por (Joe Parra) on November 28, 2007 (Suggest removal)

<< This talk about being limited because it’s a lower-revenue team is self-fulfilling. It’s up to a wise management to find ways to increase that revenue. It’s not like the Tampa Bay area is a little hick town with no people. >>

See: Stadium, New

Suggest removal

Por (Casey Brown) on November 28, 2007 (Suggest removal)

It’s hard to believe that this ownership group could be worse than the last, but I don’t believe anything that comes out of Sternberg’s mouth except that he won’t spend any money. Also,
what makes Friedman qualified to run
a major league team?

Suggest removal

Por (ML) on November 28, 2007 (Suggest removal)

I cannot believe the Rays are not going to bring in an experienced Major League catcher to compete with Navarro.
I guess that is just another example of their lack of a commitment to winning. I bet Stu is happy about those luxury tax dollars for his pockets.

Suggest removal

Por (Bill Byrne) on December 03, 2007 (Suggest removal)

Another frustrating year in 2008! As long as we have a non-baseball owner we will continue to have a good Triple A team in St. Pete! Sooner or later, the few fans we have left will bail out and that will be a sad day for everyone.

Suggest removal
Page 1 of 1 pages

Post a comment

Members:

(Requires free registration.)




Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?


Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.