MORE
Most Recent Entries
- Opionions on Chris Neil hit on Lightning defenseman Victor Hedman
- Pregame Lightning notes, Ryan Craig back with the team
- Early notes before Lightning game vs. Philadelphia
- Jeff Greene out as potential Lightning investor
- Tocchet's bullet: ice time
- Video of the Lightning's "Naked Shootout''
- Lightning partake in a round of "Naked Shootout'' after practice
- Time change announced for Nov. 2
- Smith well enough to play, but Niittymaki gets the call
- Niittymaki earns another start
- Backup goalie gets first start
- Inside the Lightning featuring Rick Tocchet to debut Thursday
- Lightning's Hale expected to fill in on blue line
- CW 44 to air six additional Lightning games this season
- IKEA teams up with the Lightning
Monthly Archives
Forum: Talk Lightning
|
Lightning players have gathered at the TPC Cheval for a charity golf tournament today. They went off on a shotgun start a few minutes ago.
No word yet on whether the Oren Koules group has met with Lightning front office members, but team president Ron Campbell is here at the tournament. Read into that what you will, because he didn’t talk about it before teeing off.
Not among the playing groups are two of the hot-topic Lightning players, D Dan Boyle and C Brad Richards. They’re both meeting groups as they go through a certain green and putting around a bit before the next group moves in.
Before the event got started, though, Richards and Boyle did take a moment to talk about the uncertainty that surrounds the team as the trade deadline tomorrow at 3 p.m. looms ever closer and as the ownership situation comes to an apparent head.
Both players possess no-trade clauses in their contracts, and both said they had not been asked as of this afternoon to waive those no-trade clauses. Boyle, a pending free agent, also didn’t shed much light on his contract negotiation, other than to reiterate that he wants to be with the Lightning for the foreseeable future.
Here’s a sampling of their comments this morning:
Boyle on whether he believes the new ownership group wants to keep him after this season (or even beyond the trade deadline):
““There’s no secret I love to be here, and from what I’ve heard, everyone would like me to be here. But with the ownership situation, it makes it a little bit more difficult. ... Who’s to know? If you’re not on the same page, then I don’t know where you go from there. It’s unfortunate the season has gone the way it has, because it looks like we’re one of the last-place teams in the league. But I certainly wouldn’t want to stay here if I didn’t think that we could turn this thing around quickly, and I think we can.”
Richards on the uncertainty of a potential transfer of ownership from Palace Sports & Entertainment to Koules’ OK Hockey Group:
“They’ve kept this very professional under the circumstances. Unfortunately, the right people built this organization the way it should’ve been, and it’s getting torn apart. And it’s not all by their doing. A lot of outside influences. So, it’s unfortunate to see that happening, but we’ll see. You never know.”
Richards on whether he had been asked to waive his no-trade clause (tsn.ca reported that the team would bring him a list of teams he might approve on Sunday night, which apparently did not happen):
“To be honest with you, it wasn’t a fun week since last weekend. It still isn’t fun. A lot of sleepless nights, and we still don’t have a decision. As of yet, I haven’t been asked to go anywhere. I guess that’s the frustrating part, is sitting and waiting. Jay [Feaster has] been really good with me. He’s kept me in the loop and has been really good and supportive. We’ll see. I still don’t know what my decision’s going to be. I’m in control of it, so we’ll see what happens.”
Richards on how important it is for him to have that no-trade clause:
“If I didn’t have it, this would be a real messy situation for myself, personally. But it’s in their hands to bring something to me if it’s going to happen. If they don’t, then we’ll move on.”
We’ll have more as the day progresses.
Posted by Anthony Neuger, Tampa on 02/25 at 10:20 PM
what a mess, did you really think the lightning could get a quality goalie with the Fantastic 4 in place if they aren’t allowed to spend more…they set the market and tied their hands with brad’s deal if they weren’t going to be allowed to spend more…and if this group cuts the money, they cut ties with their fans b/c they won’t win any time soon. We stopped getting our season tix a year ago.
It would be one of the saddest day’s in team history if #19, the conn smythe trophy winner, was no longer a bolt. He is one of classiest guys to play in any league.
Who knows if management and coaches make it much further too…it will never be the same…always cherish what we saw in 2004! The toughest accomplishment in team sports!
Posted by Gary Meleski, Sebring, Florida on 02/25 at 05:21 PM
Here is something really interesting everyone should at least look at. It’s purely mathematics.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nhl/story/7839208/Fortunes-won’t-change-on-picks-alone
Posted by Philip Thunderbug, Lutz on 02/25 at 05:13 PM
Why can’t this blog sort the postings in DESCENDING order instead of making us scroll all the way to the bottom?
Posted by TJ Robinson, Lancaster SC on 02/25 at 02:54 PM
It’s my understanding that NHL contracts cannot be reworked. Once they are signed they are done until it expires. The CBA does not allow the reworking of contracts. Never has, I don’t think.
Posted by Ed Mills, NPR on 02/25 at 02:43 PM
I believe contracts in the NHL are guarunteed, so there isn’t much leverage for the team. Players in the NFL usually re-work deals to avoid getting cut.
Posted by Marcel Giorgetta, Orlando on 02/25 at 01:24 PM
The Tampa Bay area historically is not very supportive of losing franchises, so why would anyone want to tear apart a franchise that is only missing a few pieces of the puzzle?
With the documented loss of revenue currently, does it make any sense to take this franchise down and incur bigger losses?
Posted by Timothy Bennett, Nashville on 02/25 at 01:12 PM
The Collective Bargaining Agreement between the NHL owners and players prohibits the re-working of contracts like the NFL does.
Posted by Jay, Jax on 02/25 at 12:57 PM
Thanks for the updates EE. Keep them coming!
Posted by Heather Connell, Jacksonville on 02/25 at 12:39 PM
Why can’t the Bolts rework contracts similar to the NFL in a best for the team concept and ADD the pieces necessary for a second line and defense to put us where we all want to be?
Advertisement
Send Us Your Comments |
Terms & Conditions |
* Comments Must Include Full Name And Location
Posted by Anthony Neuger, Tampa on 02/25 at 10:21 PM
what a mess, did you really think the lightning could get a quality goalie with the Fantastic 4 in place if they aren’t allowed to spend more…they set the market and tied their hands with brad’s deal if they weren’t going to be allowed to spend more…and if this group cuts the money, they cut ties with their fans b/c they won’t win any time soon. We stopped getting our season tix a year ago.
It would be one of the saddest day’s in team history if #19, the conn smythe trophy winner, was no longer a bolt. He is one of classiest guys to play in any league.
Who knows if management and coaches make it much further too…it will never be the same…always cherish what we saw in 2004! The toughest accomplishment in team sports!