MORE
Most Recent Entries
- The Mother Of All Sore Losers - In More Ways Than One
- The Jimmy Buffet Careeer Protection Act
- A Twisted Take On "Patriotism"
- I'm Satan - Fly Me
- C'Mon You Didn't Actually Believe He Wouldn't Show, Did You?
- Waiting For That 2009 Best Seller
- The Witness Protection School Of Politics
- Picky, Picky, Picky
- Whatever Happened To "It Aint't Beanbag?"
- Some People Just Can't Take A Joke
- When You're In Love, You're In Love
- Political Game Loses Major Player
- Please, Put That Back On - Now!
- The Mean And Sleazy Streets Of Tampa
- A Tribute To A Good Man
Monthly Archives
|
By late Tuesday evening as John McCain was conceding and hundreds of thousands of people were descending upon Chicago’s Grant Park to witness history-in-the-making as Barack Obama assumed the presidency of the Untied States, radio talk show bloviator Rush Limbaugh had to be feeling like a bigger self-made chump than Eliot Spitzer.
After all just a few short months ago Limbaugh had been predicting Obama would “lose big” in the upcoming presidential election because he would fail to attract traditional Democratic constituencies - blue-collar, working class voters. Sheesh, if this guy was any more wrong, he’d make Dick Cheney seem like Kreskin.
And indeed, since Tuesday night, Limbaugh has been inveighing against Obama, calling him a Chicago thug. Maybe, but if he is Barack Obama just might be the first Harvard educated thug in Chicago history.
What Limbaugh and his fellow radio henchmen refuse to acknowledge is that the Obama camoaign will likely be studied for years to come by political scientists and historians as perhaps one of the most flawless presidential campaigns in American history, with the possible fashion faux pas of Michelle Obama’s dress on election night.
What was she thinking? But that’s another story.
John McCain lost his race to Obama primarily because he was old, picked a crazy nut for a running mate and bounced around like a pin-ball from issue-to-issue, never finding his footing, or a coherent message to justify his election.
The Obama campaign from Day One, remained focused, even keeled, undistracted, on point and disciplined - in short presidential.
This was like Mr. Dithers taking on Steve McQueen.
And while McCain was whining about Bill Ayres, or vague references to “socialism,” and unruffled Barack Obama promoted a vision for the future.
Why did Barack Obama win? Because much like Ronald Reagan, 28 years ago, the Illinois senator offered a sense of idealism, optimism and the promise of a better day. John McCain talked about Joe the Plumber, who was busy hiring a public relations firm to promote him.
Despite all the lies, Obama prevailed against the chattering classes of right-wing radio.
He is not a Muslim. His is not a socialist. He was born in this country. He does not want to take your guns away. he does not ant to change the national anthem to “I Want To each The World To Sing.” He is a Christian.
And on his journey to the White House, Barack Obama, a former community organizer, organized tens of thousands of people to work for him, on the way to creating a sophisticated $700-million campaign, which utilized the latest in technology to raise money, mobilize supporters and promote his message.
And his critics claimed he had never managed anything?
The Obama campaign has transformed the American political landscape.
Rush Limbaugh will still have his audience of lemmingesq fellow travelers to carry for his gospel of shopworn rigjht-wing ideology.
If you want to tune in, Limbaugh will be easy to find. Just look in your rear-view mirror. Riding with John McCain, George Bush and Sarah Palin in a buckboard, falling further and further behind.
Posted by Beavis39ghz, Tampa, FL on 11/11 at 06:31 AM
Dan:
Although I disagreed with you more than I agreed, I will sorely miss your wit and sarcasm on the opinion page of the Tribune.
Godspeed to you and the Bombshell of the Balkans as you enter this tough job market.
-beavis
Posted by Susan Gillespie, Riverview, Fl on 11/10 at 07:00 PM
As usual you hit the nail on the head and made me laugh out loud. You are one of the reasons I love to read the Tribune and I will sorely miss your presence. It is just a temporary layoff, right?
I understand the why but I don’t have to like it. It’s tough out there, but humorous writing is what helps us all get through it. Will you still have your blog?
Thanks for your twisted sense of humor.
Your fellow Akronite,
Susan
Posted by Jamie Westlake, Brandon, FL on 11/10 at 11:45 AM
You are a gifted and bright writer. I do, however, wish you could find a way to disagree without being so disagreeable about it. I believe you could be a part of the solution in the conflict of red/blue, conservative/liberal by, for example, not being such a “sore winner.” Enjoy the results you’ve longed for in this election, but find ways to be less “snarky.” I suspect you have the potential to be well received even without being so strident and angry, especially since you identify yourself as a Christ follower.
Posted by pacfandave, St Petersburg on 11/08 at 07:06 AM
Three points: 1) Obama won not on his merits (he has none) but on large-scale dissatisfaction with Republicans in general and W in particular. 2) Obama did not manage his campaign; the hack he picked to be his chief of staff did. He simply showed up where he was told when he was told and said what he was told. 3) Potato, potahto; tomato, tomahto; socialist, liberal. Jimmy Carter lite, that’s Obama. We’ll see how much you are celebrating his election in four years.
Advertisement
Send Us Your Comments |
Terms & Conditions |
* Comments Must Include Full Name And Location
Posted by Dorothy Iorio, 1647 W. Snow Cir., Tampa,Fl 33606 on 11/12 at 12:30 PM
Dan-
I will sorely miss your column. You were never afraid to tackle the controversial issues - with humor and intellect. As a sort of film junkie myself, I especially liked your references to films.
As for being 59, from my view point, you’re just beginning.
Here’s lookin at you kid.
Dorothy Iorio