MORE
Most Recent Entries
- The Mother Of All Sore Losers - In More Ways Than One
- The Jimmy Buffet Careeer Protection Act
- A Twisted Take On "Patriotism"
- I'm Satan - Fly Me
- C'Mon You Didn't Actually Believe He Wouldn't Show, Did You?
- Waiting For That 2009 Best Seller
- The Witness Protection School Of Politics
- Picky, Picky, Picky
- Whatever Happened To "It Aint't Beanbag?"
- Some People Just Can't Take A Joke
- When You're In Love, You're In Love
- Political Game Loses Major Player
- Please, Put That Back On - Now!
- The Mean And Sleazy Streets Of Tampa
- A Tribute To A Good Man
Monthly Archives
|
Who knew that when President Bush suggested Americans should go shopping as a gesture of patriotism, Sarah Palin would take it to Imelda Marcos proportions of “Give me liberty or give me Donna Karan!”
Perhaps it is not too late for the John McCain campaign to change its slogan to “Saks Fifth Avenue First!”
Let’s see if we have this straight.
We’re in the midst of the worst economic crisis since The Great Depression. Americans are losing their jobs, their homes, their life savings. People are scrimping by. Things are tough. Things are bad.
And in the middle of a presidential campaign, Republican John McCain, who has been preaching fiscal restraint, fiduciary responsibility, obviously approved a party expense of $150,000 to gussy up his running mate? A simple question. Are you nuts, senator?
To date, since McCain had the mother of all brain infarctions and selected “Gilligan’s Island’s” Ginger as his running mate the GOP has pent $150,000 in party faithful contributions in a sort of “What Not To Wear From Hell” to make over Sarah Palin’s wardrobe.
It’s probably not unreasonable to assume that when Palin was picked, somebody somewhere in the McCain camp said: “My Gawd, not only did John choose the Gidget of the NRA to be his running mate, but she has all the fashion sense of Ma Kettle. Get thee to Givenchy immediately!”
Sheesh, this is starting to make John Edwards’ $400 haircut look like a Rayhawk.
According to financial records obtained by Politico.com, Republican funds have been expended to buy Palin $49,425 in clothing from Saks, and an additional $75,000 in rags from Neiman-Marcus. This was hardly a Hockey Mom Wal-Mart moment.
As well another $44,716 has been spent on Palin’s hair and make-up. Wait a minute! They spent $44,716 on the Alaskan governor’s hair and make-up - and that was they best they do?
Good grief, the fashionista Stasi Mr. Blackwell, who just checked out to that “Devil Wears Prada” in the sky has to be spinning in his grave, thinking, “Why couldn’t I have held out for just a few more days?”
At the same time, the GOP ponied up another $5,000 for First Dude Todd Palin’s duds and another $295 in infant clothes. What? The governor never had a baby shower for her new tot?
Even if you are a well-to-do Republican, it has to be pretty galling to know contributions to the party were spent, not to advance the McCain presidential campaign, but to enhance the running-mate’s closet.
And yet, after all the money has been spent on sending Palin to Vogue school, the candidate still comes off looking like a 44-year-old woman trying to come off as a 24-year-old woman.
Please, please, please get rid the Fonzi leather jackets. Please do something with that hair, which looks like it was inspired by Lily Munster.
And especially please, stop being such flaming hypocrites.
It is awfully hard to being running around the country claiming you are a Joe Six-Pack kind of candidate when you are dressed to the nines.
It is awfully hard to be insisting how well you relate to Joe the Plumber when you are Versace the Pol.
And it is awfully hard to preach self-reliance and rugged individualism when you are accepting $150,000 worth of free - stuff.
What is truly amazing is it seems no one in the myopic McCain campaign could see how bad this looks, especially in the middle of a presidential run when the looming issue is a financial crisis crippling millions of American families.
Or perhaps, in the end, sadly, it’s not so amazing after all.
Posted by christopher verdi, new port richey on 10/28 at 11:56 AM
are you daniel ruth or ruth daniel.you might be pat from the saturday night live skit,.its aMAZING HOW WOMENS RIGHTS .no longer apply nor ever did for real women,who have morals and families.why do you make fun of others,when your belief system hates ,hate crimes.most angry hypocrits you liberals are.thought you wanted to spread the wealth,sarah cant get any though. how do you get out of bed in the morning.
Posted by Jim Eddy, Lutz on 10/26 at 01:15 PM
Mr Ruth,
Ok, WE GET IT! You dislike Christians…maybe even hate us. So many of your stories have either singular comments or entire themes around disparaging Christians. That is your prerogative. It is unfortunate you get so much joy about detailing the failures of those who fall short of their values. Instead of paying attention to THAT 1% why not try actually working. Go out to the community and talk with those who are feeding the hungry, providing shelter and love. I know it doesn’t sell papers but it is not as divisive and keeps people from labeling you a hypocrite when highlight the bigotry of others.
Posted by Chuck Hoskinson, Valrico FL on 10/25 at 03:11 PM
I suppose that this line of journalism is the best that your writing style and mindset could come up with, disregarding the gaffes by Joe Biden, the socialistic comments by Barack Obama, and the $443.00 luncheon bill of Michelle Obama at the Waldorf-Astoria.
You are certainly authentic MSM material!
Posted by pacfandave, St Petersburg on 10/24 at 06:10 AM
Dan’l, Dan’l. What a portrait of gloom and doom you liberals paint. I’m not on the verge of losing my job, my house, my life savings. Are you? And why would you want Sarah Palin, a hottie by anyone’s definition, to end up looking the frump like Rosie O’Donnell, Hillary without her make-up, or Nancy (Sam Jaffe in drag?) Pelosi? So plain-Janes on the left can compete? When all you can find to criticize about a candidate is that candidate’s appearance, it seems to me you are like a drowning man groping in vain for a piece of driftwood. At least she brings substance to her suits, unlike the affirmative action candidate for president.
Advertisement
Send Us Your Comments |
Terms & Conditions |
* Comments Must Include Full Name And Location
Posted by Jan Flowers, Tampa on 10/29 at 05:03 AM
Thanks, Dan, for highlighting yet another Republican gaffe. I’d love to hear your view of their non McCain endorsed ads of late. I’m embarrassed by and for them and our country. The Democrats have certainly taken a higher road this go-round and that’s what our entire country, regardless of party, should demand.
Shame shame shame on slimey tactics regardless of party. I’m registered R. but have voted D. for years and years for reasons made supremely obvious by the R.s and their dreadful choices throughout this year’s effort.
You’re great! Thank you.
Jan