WFLA News Channel 8 The Tampa Tribune CentroTampa.com

TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online


RSS Feed of the blog

Contributors:

Reporter William March has covered state and national politics since 1994. Email


Reporter Christian M. Wade has covered the City of Tampa since 2008. Email


Reporter Mike Salinero has covered Hillsborough County government for The Tampa Tribune since 2007. Email


Reporter Lindsay Peterson has been a general assignment reporter at the Tampa Tribune since 2005, focusing on higher education since 2009. Email


Tribune Politics Coverage
Florida Political Blogs:
More Resources:
Most Recent Entries
More
Monthly Archives
Fresh Squeezed Politics - March On Politics Blog

Third time’s a charm: Court approves Hometown Democracy financial statement

Posted Jul 9, 2009 by Catherine Dolinski, Tribune Tallahassee Bureau

Updated Jul 9, 2009 at 11:25 AM

The Florida Supreme Court has just approved the latest financial impact statement from Hometown Democracy petitioners, after rejecting their previous two submissions.

The high court has already approved the HD ballot question for the 2010 statewide ballot; the proposal would require voters to approve local land use plans. But without a valid financial impact statement, the question would have appeared with a notation indicating that no such information was available, according to the Secretary of State’s office.

The court rejected HD’s prior two impact statements on grounds that they were misleading and/or vague. The new one, according to a court opinion released today, is “clear, unambiguous, consists of no more than seventy-five words, and is limited to address the estimated increase or decrease in any revenues or costs to the state or local governments,” and therefore passes legal muster.

Per this latest financial statement, the impact of Hometown Democracy’s proposal “on local government expenditures cannot be estimated precisely. Local governments will incur additional costs due to the requirement to conduct referenda in order to adopt comprehensive plans or amendments thereto. The amount of such costs depends upon the frequency, timing, and method of the referenda, and includes the costs of ballot preparation, election administration, and associated expenses. The impact on state government expenditures will be insignificant.”


(0) Read Comments
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles