Reporter William March has covered state and national politics since 1994. Email
Reporter Christian M. Wade has covered the City of Tampa since 2008. Email
Reporter Mike Salinero has covered Hillsborough County government for The Tampa Tribune since 2007. Email
Reporter Lindsay Peterson has been a general assignment reporter at the Tampa Tribune since 2005, focusing on higher education since 2009. Email
|
Posted Oct 27, 2009 by Catherine Dolinski, Tallahassee bureau
Updated Oct 27, 2009 at 01:30 PM
Mike Bennett, chairman of the Senate Committee on Community Affairs, was by no means pleased this month when state Community Affairs Secretary Tom Pelham told Bennett’s panel that a new growth management law hadn’t freed urban-area developers from transportation concurrency rules as lawmakers had expected.
In Pelham’s professional opinion, the new law—formerly known as SB 360, sponsored by Bennett—exempted developers only from state-imposed mandates. It did not, the DCA secretary said, restrict local governments’ ability to enforce their own growth management rules.
In a recent letter, the outspoken Bennett—a developer who also proposed last session to abolish Pelham’s entire agency—told the secretary that that his interpretation is wrong-headed, and gave him a talking-to about the limits of his role:
“While it is clear that the Department has a limited role in the interpretation of the growth management provisions of Senate Bill 360 through its power of implementation, the Department has no special insight or responsibility for interpretation of the Constitutional provisions governing home rule authority. Similarly, the Department is accorded no special deference on the issue of legislative intent.”
That intent, Bennett concluded, was “clearly” something other than to reinforce the status quo for local governments.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online ©2010 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company. Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us