TBO.com > News > News blog Reports
- Skidmore proposes statewide protections for transgender people as Tampa enacts rule locally
- Get your Bill McCollum autograph today! GOP reigns supreme on eBay (updated)
- Unemployment in Florida reaches 11.2 percent; debate over federal aid continues
- Rubio within 10 points of Crist? So says Daily Kos poll
- Sink’s CFO office chief to move to campaign
- AG race could be a contest of dog lovers
- Meek tries to pin down Crist on unemployment compensation aid
- Rubio backer collects $$ from Crist buddies
- GOP “emergency meeting” tomorrow; Okaloosa party votes against Greer
- Dockery snags endorsement from former GOP chairman Tom Slade
- Erin Isaac’s resignation letter
- Aronberg gets painters’ union endorsement
- AARP: Poll shows members support health care reform
- New “fair and balanced” Tally news service coming?
- Today’s number: 35, average age for high blood pressure in military
Mike Bennett, chairman of the Senate Committee on Community Affairs, was by no means pleased this month when state Community Affairs Secretary Tom Pelham told Bennett’s panel that a new growth management law hadn’t freed urban-area developers from transportation concurrency rules as lawmakers had expected.
In Pelham’s professional opinion, the new law—formerly known as SB 360, sponsored by Bennett—exempted developers only from state-imposed mandates. It did not, the DCA secretary said, restrict local governments’ ability to enforce their own growth management rules.
In a recent letter, the outspoken Bennett—a developer who also proposed last session to abolish Pelham’s entire agency—told the secretary that that his interpretation is wrong-headed, and gave him a talking-to about the limits of his role:
“While it is clear that the Department has a limited role in the interpretation of the growth management provisions of Senate Bill 360 through its power of implementation, the Department has no special insight or responsibility for interpretation of the Constitutional provisions governing home rule authority. Similarly, the Department is accorded no special deference on the issue of legislative intent.”
That intent, Bennett concluded, was “clearly” something other than to reinforce the status quo for local governments.
Advertisement
