TBO.com > News > News blog Reports
- Get your Bill McCollum autograph today! GOP reigns supreme on eBay
- Unemployment in Florida reaches 11.2 percent; debate over federal aid continues
- Rubio within 10 points of Crist? So says Daily Kos poll
- Sink’s CFO office chief to move to campaign
- AG race could be a contest of dog lovers
- Meek tries to pin down Crist on unemployment compensation aid
- Rubio backer collects $$ from Crist buddies
- GOP “emergency meeting” tomorrow; Okaloosa party votes against Greer
- Dockery snags endorsement from former GOP chairman Tom Slade
- Erin Isaac’s resignation letter
- Aronberg gets painters’ union endorsement
- AARP: Poll shows members support health care reform
- New “fair and balanced” Tally news service coming?
- Today’s number: 35, average age for high blood pressure in military
- Gun rights advocates split between McCollum, Dockery
A House panel has rejected a request from former House Speaker Ray Sansom that it suspend its investigation into his conduct while criminal proceedings against him are still pending.
The panel is responding to a citizen complaint about Sansom’s past handling of state appropriations and whether his actions violated the chamber’s rules of conduct. Sansom, R-Destin, faces criminal charges stemming from the same matter.
Sansom’s lawyers asked the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct in writing to stay its investigation until the court case has been resolved. This morning, attorney Richard Coates addressed the committee in person on Sansom’s behalf, asking that the members “not look at this in a vacuum.”
Melanie Hines, independent counsel to the panel, said there is no Constitutional requirement that civil or administrative proceedings be stayed pending the outcome of a parallel criminal case. The House panel has seven months in which to reach a finding, Hines said, and “if we wait for the appellate court to decide this case … we may well be beyond where this committee and the full House can act, and it would moot out this complaint before you, without your ever having been able to address it.”
Committee chairman Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, said he did not think at this point that going forward would “demonstrably prejudice substantial rights of the investigated party,” a standard established by legal precedent.
The panel voted unanimously to continue its investigation. A hearing is scheduled the week of Jan. 25.
Advertisement
