TBO.com > News > News blog Reports
- Skidmore proposes statewide protections for transgender people as Tampa enacts rule locally
- Get your Bill McCollum autograph today! GOP reigns supreme on eBay (updated)
- Unemployment in Florida reaches 11.2 percent; debate over federal aid continues
- Rubio within 10 points of Crist? So says Daily Kos poll
- Sink’s CFO office chief to move to campaign
- AG race could be a contest of dog lovers
- Meek tries to pin down Crist on unemployment compensation aid
- Rubio backer collects $$ from Crist buddies
- GOP “emergency meeting” tomorrow; Okaloosa party votes against Greer
- Dockery snags endorsement from former GOP chairman Tom Slade
- Erin Isaac’s resignation letter
- Aronberg gets painters’ union endorsement
- AARP: Poll shows members support health care reform
- New “fair and balanced” Tally news service coming?
- Today’s number: 35, average age for high blood pressure in military
Former Florida senator and elder statesman Bob Graham, who will be on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission to find the causes of the nation’s financial meltdown, said in an interview today he hopes to find out why some nations, including Canada and Australia, were comparatively little affected by the global financial crisis.
Asked whether the commission should fix blame on individuals, he said, “We’re not prosecutors, we’re not trying to indict people for their bad conduct. Our goal is to determine why did the system fall down and what steps can be taken to try to assist with the current crisis and reduce the chances of a future occurrence.”
He noted that the chairman, former California Treasurer Phil Angelides, will decide what witnesses are called and for what purpose.
Graham will be one of 10 people, six appointed by Democratic congressional leaders and four by Republican leaders, on the commission. It’s intended to be similar to the commission that investigated the causes of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Graham said he hopes partisanship won’t hinder its work.
“I’m still chairing a commission on proliferation of weapons of mass destruction which has exactly the same makeup—four Republicans and five other Democrats,” he said. “We were able to get a very strong, unanimous report.”
Without unanimous backing by members, Graham said, reports by such commissions lose much of their force.
Some criticized the 9/11 commission for watering down its conclusions in order to achieve that unanimity.
“There’s something to that, and in our WMD report we sometimes used language in order to get unanimous support that wasn’t as sharp as I would have written myself,” Graham said. “But we were still able to get a set of conclusions that I think were hard-hitting.”
Advertisement
