Reporter William March has covered state and national politics since 1994. Email
Reporter Mike Salinero has covered Hillsborough County government since 2007. Email
Reporter James L. Rosica covers state government from the Tribune's Tallahassee bureau. Email
Florida Political Blogs:
Most Recent Entries
- Cramming time for those casting ballots Election Day
- StPetePolls says Sink leading among early voters
- Update: Scott says he’d veto Az anti-gay rights bill
- Az anti-gay rights law enters Fl governor’s race
- Gaetz, Weatherford: No major environmental actions coming in session
- Chamber poll: Jolly over Sink 44-42
- Medical pot advocate upset over booze measures
- Buckhorn host Obamacare weekend sign-ups
- Tampa Chamber urges MacDill emphasis in D-13 race
- Mr. Crist Goes to Tallahassee
- ‘Cash balance’ state pension bill filed
- Polls show Sink leading in CD 13
- Crist files papers for re-election bid
- Senate President Gaetz backs medical pot bill
- Florida House members stay with parties on debt ceiling vote
MacManus analyzes 2012 election in new book chapter
Posted Jan 16, 2013 by William March
Updated Jan 16, 2013 at 04:59 PM
In a chapter of a new book compiled by Larry Sabato, University of South Florida political scientist Susan MacManus analyzes the 2012 election and makes several predictions about what to look for in 2016. Among them:
In both 2008 and 2012, Florida Republicans got exactly what they wanted by flouting national Republican Party rules and scheduling the state presidential primaries early. The Florida primaries were fiercely contested, closely watched and pivotal in both years, despite penalties imposed by the national party for the early dates. That makes it seem unlikely the national parties will be able to enforce any rules designed to control primary scheduling.
Debates were crucial in both the 2012 GOP primary and the general election, but there was also unprecedented questioning of debate moderators and procedures, including exclusion of third-party candidates. That means 2016 may see intense controversy over plans for the debates.
The well-documented effectiveness of Obama’s high-tech voter turnout program raises the questions: Will the Democrats be able to do the same thing again? “Is the Obama coalition primarily loyal to him … or to the Democratic Party?”
Between the campaigns and heavily funded independent committees, the airwaves were hugely oversaturated with political ads. 2016 will see debate over whether it’s better to spend ad money early when the airwaves are less congested, as Obama did, or use online ads and get-out-the-vote databases and organizing instead.
Both parties ended up losing the states where their conventions were held, and television coverage of conventions continued to decline. But the parties still love conventions, so they’re probably not going away. Even though they decide nothing, they’re a chance to show off rising party stars and send unfiltered messages to voters.
The Obama campaign did a better job planning state-by-state strategy because their internal polling and voter contact information was more accurate than that of published polls, which overstated Romney’s support. Although MacManus doesn’t explore it, the obvious question is whether this means polls are becoming less accurate, or less reliable than campaign technology.
The book, “Barack Obama and the New America,” is a compilation of the thoughts of prominent political scientists on the 2012 race by Sabato of the University of Virginia, one of the nation’s most often-quoted political scientists. It’s expected to be released this month.