Posted Oct 22, 2008 by Donna Koehn
Updated Oct 22, 2008 at 10:16 AM
The number of kids leaving a doctor’s office with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder has increased 40 times over the past decade. The illness is marked by dramatic swings in mood from mania to depression.
Additionally, 1 in 150 kids has autism, and more than 4.4 million U.S. children have been diagnosed with ADHD.
Some people sense we’re simply better at detecting problems nowadays; others argue it’s the drug companies pushing for new customers. Many parents blame a preservative added to vaccines their children received as babies, others think it’s lead, pollution or other environmental causes.
To me, it seems something is causing our generation’s kids to develop neurodevelopmental disorders at a scary and perplexing rate.
One piece of the puzzle is emerging. Last month’s issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, one of the Journal of American Medical Association journals, reports that the increase in bipolar disorder may be related to the older age of fathers.
Such a link already has been discovered for schizophrenia and autism.
The risk begins after the age of 29 and increases as men age. The description of how this happens is complicated, but boiled down, it’s like this: As men get older, destructive DNA mutations replicate and therefore increase in numbers. Women are born with all their eggs, so there is no increase in mutations over time.
Children who are born to fathers 55 and older are 1.37 times more likely to have bipolar disorder than those whose fathers are in their 20s. The scientists were careful to rule out other factors that could cause this.
Knowing the why on this one doesn’t really help us figure out what to do about it. Certainly many men aren’t ready to be fathers in their 20s, and no one is suggesting they rush into that. There are many reasons to delay parenthood, but here’s one that says earlier sometimes is better.
(Requires free registration.)
ADVERTISEMENT
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online ©2010 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company. Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us
Reader Comments
Posted by (Linda Kelley) on October 23, 2008
I am 55 and I have bi-polar disorder, rapid cycling. Dad was 23 when I was born. He also had bi-polar disorder.
This opens the door to genetics and I can’t argure that hypothesis. It does seem to “run in our family,” fraternal and maternal.
I applaud the research that is being done. Bi-polar patients will grasp at any hope for relief. We will pay for expensive tests or treatments that most of us can’t afford.
We will subject ourselves to dangerous medications with little regard for the possible side effects.
We have lived in the dark ages when it comes to this disorder. Many of us will only leave our homes in the most dire circumstances. This is not only a symptom of bi-polar but it is also a result of the stigma associated with this disorder.
If the nomenclature was given as much attention as the pharmaceuitical industry perhaps we might be able to make progress on bi-polar issues.
I am not CRAZY…I just have an illness.
Posted by (Josephine Truesdell) on October 23, 2008
I found this article on the perplexing problem facing so many children very interesting and insightful. Hopefully more research will be done to stop this from happening to so many children.