|
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Rendition.
What I Liked: I liked Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal the most. The two actors are great in this movie. Jake Gyllenhaal seemed very real in his role and really made me feel his struggle of doing what’s right even though it could get you in trouble. Reese Witherspoon rips your heart out in the few scenes she is in. I must say the fact that she is an expectant mother in the film was a nice touch to her character and just made you want to cry more for her. I also felt that Meryl Streep did an amazing job in her role. It was easy to hate her. The story lines were believable and made me think. I love movies that make me think.
What I Disliked: The movie was too long. It’s interesting to watch how the two separate story lines are connected, but I felt several things could have been taken out to make this movie go a little faster. With movies like this it’s hard to watch someone be tortured for too long without thinking, okay when’s it going to be over? Once you know where a movie is going, get on with it. It was also predictable. I knew the end of one of the story lines too quickly and the other story line didn’t shock me the way I hoped it would.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I would recommend Rendition. Ultimately it is a pretty decent film and is wonderful for conspiracy theorists. There haven’t been that many great films out lately so it’s nice to see one poke its head through the rubbish that has been on the big screen in the past few months.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
What I Liked: Complex, thought provoking, and intense, this movie demanded my full attention. Reese Witherspoon is mesmerizing as the distraught, pregnant wife of the missing husband. As is to be expected, Meryl Streep plays ruthless and despicable to perfection. Neither can exist without the other, and they are together in only one heart breaking scene.
What I Disliked: This is a painful movie to watch and think about: gut wrenching torture scenes; extremist zealots spouting love of God to excuse their violence; zealous politicians spouting love of country to excuse their disregard for one citizen’s rights to protect thousands of innocents. This isn’t mind diverting entertainment; this is maddening reality occurring daily.
Would I Recommend?: If you are looking for a movie that engages your brain, and preys on raw emotions, see this movie. It is educationally stimulating, and challenges all of us to question our beliefs about our country’s “war on terror.”
Score: 7 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: As usual, I loved Peter Sarsgaard’s perfect face; but even he, my favorite actor of all time, could not save this movie for me.
What I Disliked: What a major let down! “Rendition” is slow, boring, and an unbelievable waste of talent. I never could have imagined that a movie with so many big names – Reese Witherspoon, Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, and Meryl Streep – could result in such a dud. Don’t let the trailer for this one fool you, it’s about a hundred times more exciting than the actual movie. Scene after scene, nothing could evoke any emotion or interest from me at all, particularly not the world’s most anticlimactic reunion scene at the end of the movie between Reese Witherspoon’s character and her husband! I feel like “Rendition” tries to send a clear message to its audience but completely fails to engage the audience enough to make anyone care or take that message seriously.
Would I Recommend?: I would not recommend this movie because there is a slew of other post 9/11, let’s-all-hate-the-government movies out there that at least aim to be more educational and interesting than “Rendition.”
Score: 2 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Elizabeth: The Golden Age.
What I Liked: How does a queen present a strong front to her people with out losing who she is inside, all while enemies close in around her? This is the engaging plot in the film Elizabeth The Golden Age. Cate Blanchett returns in an Oscar worthy role as the famous Elizabeth queen of England. She’s remarkable on the screen as she rules with pride and determination and yet shows uncertainty in herself. Cate’s portrayal is not the only ac tor that will amaze you on the screen. Geoffrey Rush once again will impress you on the big screen, this time as Sir Francis Walsingham, Queen Elizabeth’s adviser and keeper of the law of the land. Samantha Morton will also dazzle you with her representation of Mary-Queen of Scots, who helps in the plan to assassinate Elizabeth, and place herself on the throne. Along with the acting, Elizabeth The Golden Age will also leave you in awe with its elaborate sets and extravagant costumes. The plot is filled with suspense and pulls you in as it you watch English history unfold.
What I Disliked: As with most epic films some of the scenes may drag on a bit too much. The idea is to really get the audience caught in the emotion, but sometimes it gets over dramatic and artsy.
Would I Recommend?: If you are into strong dialog, dramatic epics, and/or the Elizabethan era this film is a definite must see. But if you are more into action and less into art, skip the film if you must. But if you take the chance to see it, i think you’ll be pleasantly surprised. I know I was.
Score: 7 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: I am a fan of the old Hollywood epics like Gone With the Wind and this was reminescent of one of those movies. Even though I knew the outcome as this is an historical movie, I was still looking forward to what was coming next. The cinematography is worthy of an Oscar nomination, if not a win, along with the costumes.
What I Disliked: The movie is quite graphic and gory, even though probably historically accurate—be careful with children not in high school.
Would I Recommend?: If you’re a history buff, I would definitely recommend this movie. If you’re not a history enthusiast, it may make you one. This is one of few recent releases worth the ticket price!
Score: 9 out of 10
- Lauretta Groover
What I Liked: This film was visually spectacular: the costumes and makeup were lush and detailed, the sets were lavish and beautiful, and the cinematography was energetic and majestic. The casting choices were perfect. Cate Blanchett gives an Oscar-worthy performance as Queen Elizabeth I, infusing the queen’s sovereign haughtiness with a twinge of humanity and regretfulness. In a shrewd political move, Elizabeth refused to give up her power by taking a husband, instead pouring her affection and maternal instincts into protecting her country and her people. Both Geoffrey Rush as Sir Francis Walsingham and Clive Owen as Sir Walter Raleigh were excellent, and Samantha Morton’s too-brief role as the imprisoned Mary, Queen of Scots was powerful.
What I Disliked: Do we really need another movie about Queen Elizabeth I? No matter how beautiful a film is or how talented the actors are, there is no way to present this story from a fresh angle. We all know the story, from having watched Helen Mirren, Bette Davis and others tackle this same role in countless films. Director Shekhar Kapur strives to be different from those other films by downplaying the political and religious tensions and concentrating instead on the love triangle of Elizabeth, Raleigh and Bess, the queen’s lady-in-waiting, but that strategy makes the film seem one-sided and somewhat hollow.
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend this film as an enjoyable, two-hour escape from reality, but not as an accurate history lesson or as a film destined to become a classic.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Heartbreak Kid.
What I Liked: The Heartbreak Kid started off really funny, much like both the careers Farrelly Brothers and Ben Stiller’s career. The humor was a bit edgy and politically incorrect, without being completely offensive. Jerry Stiller got some laughs as his usual spry, velour suit wearing self.
Rob Corddry, from Daily Show fame, was the best thing about the movie as Stiller’s best friend wanting his friend to bite the bullet and finally settle down. All the while being completely miserable and scared to death of making his wife angry. ‘’A happy wife equals a happy life,’’ Corddry states to Stiller, before his wife snatches his Cosmopolitan away from him.
What I Disliked: Not far into The Heartbreak Kid, Stiller gets married, and things start going south. The main thing being the movie. They are now on their honeymoon and the Farrelly’s start pulling out gross out gags which have not been used yet in their previous movies. It has been, nine years since ‘’There’s Something About Mary.’’ In those nine years, there has been some serious de-evolution.
On the honeymoon, which takes place in Mexico, the sidekick/best friend is replaced by Carlos Mencia with a horrible fake mustache and an even more horrible and more fake Mexican accent.
There were alot of miscommunication and misunderstandings as the base for many jokes, that were much better when orginally used on ‘’Three’s Company.’’
And the gross outs, were mainly just gross. Not the side-hurting funny they were once.
Would I Recommend?: High schoolers rejoice. Well, high schoolers over seventeen, because there are some pretty raunchy scenes.
Don’t get me wrong, the movie is funny at times. And that really is all it is trying to be.
But seeing Stiller make out with young, hot, upcoming actresses; random objects stuck in various body parts; liquids shooting from orifices and other squirmish gags just trying to get a laugh, is so 1998.
Been there, done that.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
What I Liked: Not much to say here ... There are some funny scenes involving Ben Stiller and his crazy wife played by Malin Akerman. I also found his honeymoon girlfriend’s family amusing.
What I Disliked: This movie is not the caliber of ‘’Meet the Parents’’ or ‘’There’s Something about Mary.’’ It falls way short of Ben Stiller’s potential. The film starts slowly, then only gets a few laughs here and there. There are several ultra obscene jokes and lots of senseless nudity in the film that are really out of place and seem like desperate attempts to keep the film entertaining. This movie is an example of how a lot of recent comedies have been trying to push the outrageous/gross out jokes a little too far, using them as a crutch rather than trying to come up with something original and interesting.
Would I Recommend?: No, it’s a let-down. Wait for a rental, if that.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: It’s a Farrelly brothers comedy starring Ben Stiller - with all the expectations that might engender, especially in terms of the humor not being subtle. It holds up very well to their previous collaboration in ‘’There’s something about Mary.’’ Ben Stiller manages the remarkable feat of keeping our sympathies throughout his desperate pursuit of another woman whilst on his honeymoon. I also liked the interactions between Ben and Jerry Stiller as a real-life father and son playing the same roles in the movie. On a slightly unrelated note, Cabo looked gorgeous, and made a superb backdrop to most scenes.
What I Disliked: Nothing really. I tend to enjoy comedies. It was longer than I expected - fitting in with the new, two-hour movie standard. I had the suspicion that it might have seemed sharper and the comedy punch more powerful if it had been slightly shorter.
Would I Recommend?: Yes. It’s very funny and manages to throw a slightly different spin on some classic comedy situations. Rob Corddry as the best friend is exceptionally good. If you go to the movie on the basis of it being a Farrelly Brothers/Ben Stiller co-operation you won’t be disappointed.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Kingdom.
What I Liked: Chilling, exhilerating and moving, “The Kingdom” delivers a gripping picture of hatred and its potential horrors. FBI investigators, led by Jamie Fox, attempt to find the mastermind of a terrorist attack at an American compound in Saudi Arabia. This is a hard film to label. While action-packed, it also serves as stirring drama - a hard look into the nature of human beings.
All the acting is strong from a cast which includes Chris Cooper, Jennifer Garner and Jason Bateman. The stand out performance, however, comes from Ashraf Barhom, who plays the Saudi colonel in charge of overseeing the investigators actions while in his country.
The brutally-honest script by Matthew Michael Carnahan rolls forward fluidly. Director Peter Berg guides you with tight shots and elegant transistion which capture the tense nature of this Middle East country.
What I Disliked: There wasn’t anything I didn’t like about this film. That said, there are some truly horrifying and intense scenes in this film which may be disturbing to some viewers.
Would I Recommend?: I have to recommend this film. It could be described as “Crash” but with a more direct approach to action sequences. I can’t remember a recent movie which drove the audience members to openly cheer during its climax but left them walking out in a eerie meditative silence. That is quite an accomplishment.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: Interesting story with intriguing contrast and clash of cultures, between the Saudi and the Americans; that mirrors the current struggles in the Middle East.
What I Disliked: Camera technique contained too much of the hand held shaky approach, could be used sparingly.
Would I Recommend?: No; only for the gung ho, paramilitary type and political junky.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: Direction of the film by Peter Berg was incredible. Raw and uncensored. As long as the movie was, the script did feel a little fast forwarded at times, but made up for with realistic character interactions between the Americans and Saudis. Foxx, Garner, and Bateman fair well as does Chris Cooper, but Ashraf Barhom who plays the chief of Saudi state police pulls out ahead with an incredible performance.
What I Disliked: Although, if you’ve seen the last two Bourne films, the camera movements are identical. Prepare to feel nauseous.
Would I Recommend?: The true-to-life feel of the film made it difficult to watch at times, but who can discourage pluralism at work?
Score: 9 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Brave One.
What I Liked: Jodie Foster returns to the big screen in the kind of role she has mastered, in The Brave One. She plays the suffering victim to an emotional realism, and the audience will feel her pain. She feeds you the heartache of losing someone close and the aftermath of a life of fear by the spoonful. And you take it in awe. And although Jodie Foster shows off that familiar acting talent once again, it is Terrence Howard who will steal the spotlight. Playing officer Mercer he does an excellent job of playing a cop that really cares , and always wants to do the right thing for the victims. He feels their pain, maybe too much. Nicky Katt is also good as he plays Detective Vitale, partner to officer Mercer, and a comic relief when the movie calls for a moment to lighten up. It doesn’t happen often as The Brave One is a very dark film.
What I Disliked: There may be moments to the audience that seem to drag while the characters go through their emotions. And it would have been nice to see more of the happiness between Jodie Foster’s character and the finace played by Naveen Andrews, known from television’s Lost, before they are torn apart by violence. We should be shown how great of a person he was, and let us know how much he meant to Jodie Foster’s character. We got what his loss meant, but what did his life with her mean?
Would I Recommend?: The Brave One is a very emotional movie, and the acting is superb. But you have to have the right mindset to see this film. Be prepared to ride that emotional roller coaster and don’t expect to feel great when it ends. It is worth seeing if you are prepared for it, otherwise wait to watch it in your own home, where no one will see you if you have to grab a tissue.
Score: 7 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: The truth and sadness behind serious violence problems that plague New York City (and really all of America). Being from NY, there were scenes in this film that really hit home-the feeling of being uncomfortable alone on a subway at night, coming across an argument and trying to ignore it, etc. It is a hard truth that random acts of violence do occur all over the country and this movie shows one woman’s view of how she coped with it and acted on her instincts. Even though Jodie Foster’s character was taking the law into her own hands, you felt impowered that she was getting the scum off of the streets any way that she could.
What I Disliked: There were parts of the film that were obviously trying to be serious, but the audience was hysterically laughing. Why? It started to become over the top towards the middle of the film with Foster’s revenge getting to be an every night event.
Would I Recommend?: Yes and No. There is some real street violence in this film that I think kids (and very immature adults) should not see. The importance of this film, though, is that violent crimes with no just cause is a harsh reality that people need to open their eyes to instead of turning the other cheek. As they quoted in the film, “Once something like this happens to you, you become a different person”.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: I really enjoyed the beginning of “The Brave One,” up until Jodie Foster’s character, Erica, commits her first crime. The beating and subsequent death of Erica’s boyfriend is brutal and hard to watch, but essential to understanding the severity of the event that haunts her. I thought the montage after the beating was brilliant. Flashes of Erica’s body in her most intimate moments with her boyfriend, alternating with flashes of her lifeless, bloody body being handled by the emergency workers, really made me feel the frailty of human life and how jarring Erica’s loss is. Upon awakening from a coma, Jodie Foster’s initial reaction to the trauma is convincing enough, and made me feel very sad with her.
What I Disliked: After Erica goes off the deep end and starts shooting people, the movie really lost me. I was unsettled by the premise that a certain amount of violence can fill the void of losing a loved one – Erica basically says this at one point, talking aloud to her dead boyfriend. For me, the key question isn’t whether or not Erica’s “victims” deserve death or not, something that is debated in the movie, but are these deaths really going to aid in her (or anyone’s) healing? Is revenge the same as recovery? This movie seemed to say so. Countless movies promote violence and revenge, but “The Brave One” seemed to aim to be more emotional and taken more seriously than your run of the mill revenge story. I felt the emotional potential of this movie was ruined by forced acting, particularly a lack of closeness between Jodie Foster and Terrence Howard, who plays an important role as a detective investigating Erica. “The Brave One” also seemed to be an inappropriate title to me. Eric a’s bravery was shown in her leaving her apartment to walk the streets of New York City, in her trying to keep working, and in her trying to go on living. The focus of the movie was on Erica’s murders, where we see Erica falling apart emotionally, considering turning herself in, and sometimes feeling guilty. I saw a confused, grief stricken woman struggling with the aftermath of tragedy, not “a brave one” on a clear mission at all. I also had a big problem with the emotional climax of the movie where Erica is hovering over a cell phone (yes, a cell phone with maybe a 3 inch screen), hysterical as she watches a video message of the beating. Is it just me or are technological references killing our movies? Overall I was disappointed that “The Brave One” had a lot of potential to be a very moving, dramatic movie but it seemed to get derailed in its effort to please audiences with lots of “tough woman” scenes and a happy ending. “The Brave One” ended up being your average reveng e movie that we’ve seen a million times.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend this movie if you liked the recently released “Death Sentence,” starring Kevin Bacon as the male equivalent of Jodie Foster. If you’re looking for something more dramatic or philosophical I’d rent “21 Grams,” a lesser known movie which explores the themes of loss and revenge a lot more convincingly and creatively.
Score: 3 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Shoot ‘Em Up.
What I Liked: NOTHING
What I Disliked: YUCK! This movie makes rotten eggs smell good. “Shoot ‘Em Up” is a spoof on action movies and really comes off like a cartoon or first person shooter video game with magic stunts. Clive Owen defines boring like no other, as usual. His delivery is exactly the same in every scene of every movie he has ever been a part of. I could see the jokes coming a mile away, and they were off the charts cheesy and as predictable as the traffic at malfunction junction (I-4/275 intersection). This movie was supposed to be funny and many were laughing in the theatre. It was just too ridiculous for me, I must be getting old. I would rather hang out in line at the division of motor vehicles.
Would I Recommend?: NO WAY!!! “Shoot ‘Em Up” is a total waste of time.
Score: 1 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: Shoot ‘Em up started with a bang. Literally. Gunshots to be more exact which continued throughout the whole movie. As an action movie, it really provided more than enough stimulation. Clive Owen is a perfect action hero. Manly, brooding, sensitive and quick-witted. Oh, and of course, handsome. Monica Bellucci was a great romantic interest and fit perfect with this movie. She was dark, sexy and mysterious. There were countless scenes of gun battles most of which were exciting and original. During each action sequence heavy metal blarred. Its really hard not to be pumped while watching Clive Owen slay fifty guys at once to “Ace of Spades” by Motorhead.
What I Disliked: Paul Giamatti’s gruff character really bugged me. I usually like him too. But his one liners, jokes, riddles and limericks (which pretty much all his dialogue consisted of) were unoriginal and unfunny.
There were alot of whys, hows and whos in Shoot ‘Em Up. Why does Clive Owen’s character eat only carrots? Why is he a vigilante? Who was Paul Giamatti’s character and why was he the boss of hundreds of men? Why didn’t Paul Giamatti’s manager read the script and change some of his lines? Some of the these questions, plus some more, were answered. Many were not.
Would I Recommend?: Shoot ‘Em Up, if not taken too seriously, is a really fun movie. The world was comic-book dark and mysterious. The action and music rocked. It was like a long rollercoaster ride. I, personally, love roller coasters. But for those who do not meet the proper height requirements, are weak of heart, or who could just care less about an hour and half long gun fight, I would skip it.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
What I Liked: The only positive comment I can make about this movie is that the director was creative in the many ways he filmed people being shot.
What I Disliked: I don’t know if the movie was meant to be a tongue-in-cheek farce of action movies, but that is certainly what it was to the audience when I saw it. There was more laughter throughout this movie than in some comedies I’ve been to recently. The “one-liner” comments said by both the “good guy” and the “bad guy” produced more groans of disbelief than anything else.
Would I Recommend?: Don’t waste your money going to a theatre. Wait until one night (probably soon) when you want to rent something for laughs, and watch it then. Better yet, wait until it comes to cable.
Score: 1 out of 10
- Lauretta Groover
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Balls of Fury.
What I Liked: An easy and undemanding evening’s entertainment. It is inoffensive enough to be suitable for family viewing. Christopher Walken’s hammy performance as The Villain was a highlight - given that, what else needs to be written.
What I Disliked: Why is Hollywood obsessed with pairs? This summer, the duo was sports comeback comedies. It could have been worse (Truman Capote parodies to balance the two bio movies of last year?) Balls of Fury is the undersized twin of Blades of Glory. Since Jack Black was apparently busy, Dan Fogler does a remarkably good job of impersonating him, even down to singing ("lip-synching"?) the prerequisite rock song.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend it to those who’ve just returned to school after the long summer break and who are feeling somewhat brain-dead. This movie requires no concentration and little or no thought, but there are amusing parts and some of the jokes are funny if not actually memorable.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Marian Hill
What I Liked: Okay, so to avenge the death of your father and assist the FBI in capturing an infamous Chinese mob boss played by Christopher Walken, you, a twenty-something year old sponged up ping pong master must enter a dangerous ping pong competition in the depths of the South American jungles. That’s Balls of Fury. There isn’t much to it. But I’ll admit, Walken will always entertain.
What I Disliked: With a plot like that, you be crazy not to watch it right? Wrong. Not only does this movie encourage others to waste studio money, but it wastes talent, beauty, and two hours of my time.
Would I Recommend?: If you want that level of comedy and hilarious stupidity without having to pay 8 bucks, watch It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia on the FX Network.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
What I Liked: I loved how funny this film was. Christopher Walken is a genius and every movie he touches is amazing. He adds a new meaning to the word silly! It takes balls to make a movie like this and it had me laughing almost throughout the entire thing. I went in knowing it would be ridiculous and super cheesy and that helped make the movie even better for me.
What I Disliked: I didn’t like the fact that there was a love story. I get it, it was supposed to add extra goofiness, but it almost seemed like the addition of any seriousness hurt the film. Just keep the jokes coming. The audience came to laugh, not to feel bad for anyone for any reason. I also didn’t like how old the plot is. Too many movies have been coming out about a fallen star trying to reclaim their fame. What’s the obsession with getting back on top? Who really cares?
Would I Recommend?: Yes, but not in theaters. Ticket prices are just too high to waste the money on a night out for this film. This movie is a cheap laugh a minute but it’s not necessary to rush to see it. Wait until it Balls of Fury comes out on DVD and rent it. An added bonus is if you stay at home you can have a beer with this movie because an inebriated audience could be the factor this film was lacking.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Mr. Bean’s Holiday.
What I Liked: If you are a fan of Mr. Bean’s ridiculous physical comedy, then you will definitely enjoy seeing this film. Although it starts off a little slow, predictable and somewhat uninviting, midway through you start to grin, then chuckle, then belly gut laugh out loud. The scene that grabs you for the rest of the film is when Mr. Bean steals a black sweater from a lady at a market and begins lip syncing to opera for money. You can’t help belting out laughter. From then on, you are hooked.
What I Disliked: The beginning of the film just didn’t grab me immediately. It seemed like recycled moments from previous Bean material. You start to wonder ‘why was this movie ever made?’ Then BAM! One scene changed the whole attitude of the film.
Would I Recommend?: Yes. This is a cute family comedy that will even get dad to crack a smile on more than one occasion. Plus it has Willem Dafoe acting as weird and as genius as usual. That’s always an added bonus.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: This was my first full on film from the Bean, although I’ve seen many out-takes, so I had some idea what I was in for. I felt as though I was Malcolm McDowell in ‘A Clockwork Orange’, strapped to a chair, and possibly subjected to a barrage of inane silliness, absurdities and slapstick humor, but to my surprise it had many unpredictable qualities, such as a plot (though twisted), interesting cinematography, and social distortions.
What I Disliked: The Bean gibberish was a little to silly for me, although at times it seemed similar to the experience of pantomime and the silent film era Charley Chaplin style slapstick.
Would I Recommend?: I wouldn’t go out of my way to recommend this.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I liked: Many of the set pieces found in Rowan Atkinson’s self-proclaimed last appearance as the title character get you giggling. Scenes where Bean raises money by dancing to various types of music in a market and tries to catch a ride from a slow moving bicyclist are humorous.
Willem Dafoe provides a fun performance of a self-absorbed actor with his first directing attempt premiering at Cannes.
What I disliked: The movie doesn’t really work as a whole. It feels like an excuse for a series of set comedy pieces to be presented. Also throughout the movie, Bean uses a video camera he’s won as part of his vacation, with shots from the camera’s point-of-view interspersed. These shots zoom by, at times blurred, confusing or dizzying.
The problem with Bean is he is sometimes unlikeable. His schemes are at times mean-spirited, though then never successful. That is the nature of his character - oblivious to the world, single-minded in his quest for his own desires. It’s not what I like to see as a main character to feature-length film.
Would I recommend?: I can’t really recommend this movie unless you are a longtime fan of Mr. Bean. While it has its bright spots, it lacks a sustained laugh value and falls short in its plot.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Don Smith
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Superbad.
What I liked: Actually very little.
What I disliked: It was a smarmy “B” grade movie (which lived up to its title) at best, with poor video quality, poor direction, an extremely weak script and virtually no acting. It was another “coming of age” movie about two nerds and a loser who basically spend their lives talking trash and fantasizing about the girls in their senior class which leads to a variety of weak misadventures and a few laughs by the largely younger audience in the theater - the age group at which it is directed, despite their prohibition by the “R” rating it deservedly carries with little to no redemption for the poor quality of the screen play.
Would I recommend?: I would not recommend this movie at all. Adults will find its trivial and trashy humor inane and the age group at whom it is aimed are technically prohibited from viewing it due to its deserved “R” rating.
1 out of 10
- Mike Horton
What I liked: It was a very funny story on teenage friendship and the trials and tribulations of high school seniors. It was extremely ludicrous but you couldn’t help but laugh. It took me way back to when I was in high school. Sometimes, I could relate. The story was good and was portrayed well by all actors.
What I disliked: When it began, it caught me off guard. I was shocked and wide eyed for minutes. The comedy is very raunchy. I never heard such things out of the mouths of fellow babes at that age. I was concerned for the four 8 - 10 year old girls that sat behind me. I was not pleased with the fowl language from such wholesome looking boys. LOL And the graphic references, well, let me not go there.
Would I recommend?: I actually recommended it to my 17 year old because I know he’d laugh his head off. However, I think it is too much for anyone under 17. You have to be very mature minded for this movie. But for those who are, it is funny if you like vulgar humor and don’t mind a lot profanity and graphic sexual references. Just don’t take your grandmother or she may just smack YOU. LOL
7 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I liked: “Superbad” is Supergreat! This is by far the best comedy of the summer! I’ll have to see it again because some of the best parts were drowned out by hysterical laughter and the sounds of people hyperventilating. Anyone in high school or who can remember the lameness of high school and has retained their sense of humor should be able to appreciate the classic themes of this movie – drinking, partying, sex (trying to have sex anyway), and the bonds of true, not-yet-tarnished-by-real-life friendship. The humor is so genuine and the acting so unforced, I felt immediately whisked back ten years ago as soon as the movie started. “Superbad” will give high schoolers something to relate to, and high school survivors a hilarious but useful tool in unlocking repressed memories of awkwardness, rejection, and possibly being a huge dork (Weren’t we all, in a way?). If you’ve been out of high school so long that you are shocked and horrified by the events and language in the movie, “
Superbad” can serve as a fun, light hearted wake up call on what’s really going on these days. The preview for this movie so unbelievably does not do it justice, and luckily the reason for that is there’s very little material in this movie that is “appropriate” for general audiences. As someone who appreciates honesty in film and filmmakers who aren’t afraid to push boundaries, I am very excited about this movie! The cast is perfect, in particular Jonah Hill and the totally amazing newcomer Christopher Mintz-Plasse.
What I disliked: The sexual humor is pretty one sided. I would have liked to see a little more of what the girls’ take on all the perversion is. Although, the main characters are male so that’s to be expected.
Would I recommend?: If you like crude, immature humor, then yes definitely go see it! If you’re old fashioned or easily offended, then definitely skip this one or your ears will bleed.
8 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Stardust.
What I liked: This film was just fabulous. It possesses a very classic fairytale feel to it in its cinematography, plot line and character development. It almost felt like a long ride in Magic Kingdom encompassing rides such as Snow White, Peter Pan, Pirates of the Caribbean and the Haunted Mansion. It had all the aspects of a great action love story with splices of comedic genius by Robert De Niro. His character in itself is worth the cost of the movie ticket as he plays a role that will keep you laughing and slightly shocked all at the same time.
What I disliked: As with any classic love story, the ending is pretty predictable. This may put some people off, but to me, I think that staying down to earth and not over the top works for this film. Yes, the ending is predictable, but the path to getting there was remarkable.
Would I recommend?: Definitely. Few movies as of recent have really made you walk out feeling warm and fuzzy like you did when you were a kid watching films like ET or the Princess Bride. You feel for the characters and become enveloped in their world. I think this is a film that can be appreciated by any age group.
8 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I liked: Charlie Cox was great as Tristan, a young man who finds love (and perhaps a kingdom!) on a quest to retrieve a fallen star. The screenplay was well written and I really enjoyed all the characters. The wacky sons of the king were all entertaining (even in the afterlife) in their pursuit of the crown, stopping at nothing to claim the kingdom. There was so much comedy and plenty of action. Michelle Pfeiffer was fantastic as the evil witch, she stole the show! Robert De Niro was an added bonus as Captain Shakespeare, as was the great Peter O’Toole as the dying King of Stormhold. Claire Danes, who I am not normally crazy about, was very tolerable in the role of Yvaine/The fallen star. I found this a lot more enjoyable than Harry Potter or any of the kid movies about magic in recent years.
What I disliked: The film was a bit cheesy and goofy at times - but it’s supposed to be, so I can’t hold that against the movie too much.
Would I recommend?: I recommend it. It’s great fun for all!
9 out of 10
-Nick Conrad
What I liked: A flying ship, loathsome witches, a liberating unicorn, contentious princes, repentant ghosts, and an earthbound star enthralled me in this extraordinary fantasy adventure. The acting, special effects, costumes, setting, and storyline are simple and true. It is wonderful to be transported into a world of romance, humor, and edge of your seat thrills without once checking to see how much time has passed or how much time remains.
What I disliked: Probably the only thing I disliked about STARDUST was that the adventure and romance had to come to an end after a mere 130 minutes. Nothing about the action was extraneous, nor were the special effects excessive. This is a magical movie with lyrical language instead of crass cursing, swashbuckling swordplay instead of maniacal gunplay, and romantic interludes instead of lustful romps. Adults, more than young children, will be enchanted and entertained.
Would I recommend?: If you desire adventure, romance, and a rousing good time, see this movie. All of the actors create believable characters in a fantastical world, especially Robert DeNiro. This consummate thespian once again transforms himself into a character with panache and verve. In this fairy tale which is so unbelievable that you will want to believe everything you see, you’ll leave the theater yearning for your own “happily ever after.”
10 out of 10
-Courtenay O’Connell
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Simpsons Movie.
What I Liked: Well, uh, its The Simpsons. I’ve been a fan for years so of course seeing them on the big screen is exciting.
All of the characters were present, sometimes all at once. Lisa found love, Bart got naked, and Homer as usual, was Homer. There were a couple of fun surprises and some great scenes and stories.
The blantant liberal and environmental stance was great to watch without being PowerPoint boring.
What I Disliked: It really just seemed like a long, two part episode. Though I think they realized this, and handled it in a funny way.
I always enjoy watching the tv show and not getting all of the references. Later looking them up, having a good laugh while learning something new whether it be about politics or pop culture. I felt the movie was dumbed down a bit. The references were obvious and I saw most of the jokes coming from far away.
I would have rather seen one of the many hilarious “Treehouse of Horror” made a half hour longer and put up on the big screen.
Would I Recommend?: As a Simpsons fan, it is a requirement to see it. You may or may not like it, but every fan I know will want to judge for themselves, probably on opening night.
I think I had too great of expectations and it did not hold up in my mind. They waited a little too long to make the movie. Alot of the comic geniuses involved over the years e.g. Conan O’Brien and Bob Odenkirk, did not work on the movie.
That being said it still is classic Simpsons and it had the whole theater, including me, laughing.
7 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
What I Liked: After years of hijinks on tv, the Simpson family has finally made the jump to the big screen. All the classic characters are here, and the animation is very clean and bright. Some of the jokes will crack you up, but most of the jokes are not any thing we haven’t seen before. There are humorous touches on current pop culture that aren’t really funny, but you’ll find entertaining.
What I Disliked: Disappointedly you get to feeling like there really isn’t whole lot to this film. It didn’t really feel like this movie had to be made. There’s nothing astounding or special here. As you watch, the film feels like you’re just watching an episode on tv, or maybe a Simpsons special. The storyline wasn’t that great, and the jokes that don’t make you laugh are jokes that have worn thin because we’ve seen over and over again. Homer says it best at the beginning when he asks why would you pay money to see something you can see on tv for free? To be honest, he’s right.
Would I Recommend?: In truth The Simpsons Movie is not worth paying the money to see. Even Simpson’s fans won’t find anything that they’ll walk away talking about the next day. Wait for this film to be released on DVD, or better yet just watch another episode on tv. Otherwise when it’s over that little voice laughing won’t be yourself, it will be Bart’s bully Nelson pointing at you saying,"Ha Ha”.
4 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: I was trying to think of something profound and witty to say but all I can say is: If you are a fan of the Simpsons, GO SEE THIS MOVIE!
You won’t regret it. I laughed through the whole thing.
The story centered mainly around Homer
who was up to his same old tricks. Fox along with the usual characters did not miss an opportunity to poke fun of themselves.
The movie, while keeping it’s classic look, sported a 3-D flare which added a nice touch. All in all, the Simpson family along with the rest of the inhabitants of Springfield, did not disappoint.
What I Disliked: I was a little surprised that the movie was so short given the amount of time that they have had to come up with a Simpsons Movie.
Apart from the 3-D animation, it basically boiled down to be no more than a glorified TV episode. The plot wasn’t very deep but it kept you entertained.
There were a few scenes that tugged at my heart strings. These scenes, although few, kind of interrupted the flow of silliness that the rest of the movie set up.
Ultimately, I am glad to say that the
disappointments were few.
Would I Recommend?: Definitely!
8 out of 10
- Jessica A Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Sunshine.
What I liked: Danny Boyle’s vision of mankind’s future is not a glorious one. Where other space films explore the far reaches of the universe, Boyle takes us to our origin. With our sun dying out, a team of eight astronauts and scientists must deliver a payload into the sun to re-ignite it. When a mysterious seven year old transmission is received from a similar previously failed mission, one by one, crew members begin to fall victim to fear and paranoia threatening to jeopardize the mission’s success. Performances from an amazing cast only make Boyle’s narrative that much more compelling. With visuals equally as poignant as the writing, I found myself grinding my teeth in several scenes.
What I disliked: But although wondrous, Boyle seems to mirror many scenes from space classics such as 2001: A Space Odyssey and even Conquest of Space. With as much plot as Boyle included into this film, it seemed to end quicker than I thought although his pacing worked well for the story.
Would I recommend?: With another astounding performance by Cillian Murphy and the supporting cast members, Boyle succeeds in again horrifying and impressing me with his sci-fi space-drama/adventure thriller/horror. Sunshine is definitely one to catch in theaters.
8 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
What I liked: The initial storyline for this movie was good and kept you interested. I liked the drama and suspense as well, and the special effects were also spectacular.
What I disliked: Unlike other “Save the Earth” movies, this movie did not give you enough information about the characters to make you care about their fate. I know that science fiction movies aren’t based in fact, but there were still many scenes I just could not accept.
Would I recommend?: If one is hot and needing to find a cool escape, and there is nothing else showing, go see this movie.
3 out of 10
- Lauretta Groover
What I liked: The actors were for the most part pretty good. Chris Evans is such a cutie that it’s hard to fault him for choosing this film. Although the movie wasn’t that great, he sure did an awesome job portraying his character. Cillian Murphy is another actor who is normally pretty good at choosing his roles. He was great in Batman Begins and Red Eye so cutting him some slack for taking on this project seemed like the right thing to do.
What I disliked: How long it felt. This film was under two hours and it still seemed like it needed an intermission. Even some of the characters made it obvious that they didn’t believe in the plot of the movie. Benedict Wong who played Trey did some bad acting and was unreal. Most of the actors were mediocre at best and didn’t present this film as well as it could have been done. Maybe the premise of the end of the world is just getting old.
Would I recommend?: No. It was such a slow film it was difficult to stay awake. All the action being at the end made it seem like the movie could have cut out 30 - 45 minutes and nothing would have been missed.
3 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Hairspray.
What I liked: This high-energy remake of the John Waters’ classic opens strong and keeps right on dancing along. The story is classic - plump teen uses her new found fame on a afternoon dance show to teach 1962 Baltimore about intergration. But the script doesn’t hold back on making fun of stereotypes about race, weight and general intolerance in a light-hearted way.
All the performances work in this one, most notably Queen Latifah (both in acting and vocal performances) as Motormouth Maybelle, the host of the dance show’s monthly Negro Day; newcomer Nikki Blonsky as Tracy Turnblat, the happy dance sensation who wants to change how people think about the races; and Amanda Bynes, as Tracy’s wide-eyed best friend.
What I disliked: While John Travolta’s performance as Tracy’s mother was solid, his fat suit and make-up were distracting. In each scene he appeared, it felt much of the joke was who he was and how he was dressed as opposed to what was happening. A humorous dance number with his (her?) husband, played by Christopher Walken, is a good case in point.
Would I recommend?: This version of Hairspray takes all the best elements from its predecessors (the original movie and the Broadway play) and creates a fun ride for audiences on its own. This film could be the break-out hit this summer if enough of its potential audience can get past that it’s a musical.
8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I liked: I thoroughly enjoyed this movie! I must admit that I’m unfamiliar with both the John Waters version and the Broadway musical, so I went into the theater with no expectations and unable to make any comparisions to other versions.
The casting was almost perfect, especially the amazing newcomer Nikki Blonsky as Tracy Turnblad. “Hairspray” has great songs, great performances, a great message and great dancing. It’s a great movie!
What I disliked: The weakest part of the movie—really, the only weak part—is John Travolta as Edna Turnblad. He doesn’t try to sound like a woman, which is odd, considering all the costume and make-up work that went into making him look like a woman. Also, Travolta makes an unsuccessful attempt at a Baltimore accent, which is extremely jarring, because his character is the only one speaking with any sort of accent at all.
Would I recommend?: I would definitely recommend this movie. It’s funny, sweet and high-energy. I can’t wait to buy the soundtrack.
9 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Harry Potter.
What I liked: The new Harry Potter movie was surprisingly user friendly, and I was able to grasp the entire cast, characters and plotline due to the fact that I had seen the first two movies. This surprised me because I haven’t read any of the books and hadn’t seen the last two movies, and was afraid I would be behind the curve.
What I disliked: For an adventure fantasy, I don’t see much wrong with it, although some of the bizarre gymnastics of the sorcerers college caretaker were a bit exaggerated and beyond gravity, but then you have to separate yourself from the known world for this genre.
Would I recommend?: Highly recommend it to fantasy special effects enthusiasts
7 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: I thought this was a wonderful movie. The effects were great, dialogue witty and storyline enthralling.
Though some naysayers might look upon these films as kid’s movies, they really touch upon mature themes such as individual thought, good versus evil, internal struggles and fighting tyranny. There are some great lessons in this movie we could all benefit from.
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are all great and are growing into full-fledged teenagers with the perfect balance of normalcy and awkwardness to make them believable. You find yourself rooting for them throughout the movie.
What I Disliked: I have not been a true follower of the Harry Potter books and movies so I was a little confused in parts. After, I immediately wanted to catch up on all that I missed prior. I also would love to have seen more of the supporting characters especially Gary Oldman who is brilliant. But when isn’t he, really?
Would I recommend?: I would highly recommend it. It helps the viewer escape the mundane which alot of movies try to accomplish but usually don’t succeed. The world in which Harry Potter and friends live in is amazing and was displayed brilliantly in this film. I was glad to be a part of it, if only for a couple of hours.
8 Out Of 10
- Stephanie Powers
What I Liked: Encapsulating an 870 page book into a 140 minute movie is no small feat. That being said, HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX, the movie, includes the most important parts of J.K. Rowling’s story.
Umbridge is painful to watch, and Luna Lovegood is mesmerizing. Both debut in this picture, and are played to perfection.
What I Disliked: So far in the series, this is the most painful movie to view (Umbridge’s personality & Harry’s internal and external conflicts), which means it is the most difficult to truly enjoy.
In the movie (as well as while reading the book), I cringed each time Harry was doubted by his friends, punished by his teachers, challenged by anyone, or confronted by Voldemort.
Would I Recommend?: Resist reading the book before seeing this movie. Otherwise, while you are watching the movie, you’ll be ticking off in your mind everything the filmmakers left out. Enjoy the movie for its merits and magic, as I did. This is the best adaptation of the series to date!
10 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Transformers.
What I liked: The cartoon was NEVER like this! In the words of one of the audience members, THIS IS THE BEST (action) MOVIE EVER (and I agree). lol Everything about the movie was done right. From the cast to the graphics, this movie was great! Once again the star Shai LeBeouf is helping to fend off robots. However, these robots are colossal and way more intricate than any iRobot (yet another great movie but it’s no Transformers). I watched the animated series as a kid and I wasn’t sure what to expect. However, after seeing all the recent animated series and comic book stories brought to life, I didn’t expect much. Well, it was better than I could have imagined. The graphics were flawless. I was as real as it gets. The cast was great. All of the actors like co-stars Megan Fox, Jon Voight, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson and Anthony Anderson all portrayed their roles well. The movie was great from beginning to end. It was very funny for an action flick but it is no comedy wit h all that action. There were no bathroom or popcorn break moments through the entire movie. I move from your seat, you’ll definitely miss a beat. Tranformers is definitely more than meets the eye!
What I disliked: OK, I was so into the action and laughing so hard, I can’t remember…Did they play the original theme song? If not, that is all that’s missing. I can’t wait to see it again so I can see what I might have miss while laughing and jumping on and of the edge my seat.
Would I recommend?: Recommend it? I strongly urge everyone see this movie now. I am sure this will be the big action flick of this summer hands down. This movie has something for everyone. Kids will love the awesomely cool robots and action. The ladies will enjoy the gorgeous heroes in uniform fighting to save our country and the love story within. Men will love the non-stop action, battle scenes and cool fast cars. Everyone will love the loads of laughs and great plot. You can’t go wrong with this movie.
10 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I liked: The classic toys of the 80’s have finally come to the big screen in a film worthy of it’s popularity and hype. Fans of the classic toys and animated series, and fans of action films will not be disappointed! Loaded with stars Transformers is a wild roller coaster ride with surprises and heart racing action at every turn. Everyone in the film, from the comedic relief teen hero played by Shia LaBeouf, to the dedicated soldiers played by Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson, do a great job of presenting you with the fear of the end of the world if the “good guys” lose. Even government personal played by Jon Voight and John Turturro, for the first time in alien movies, do not come across as villainous agents of the government but fearful protectors that are just trying to do the right thing and protect life. As far as the Autobots and the Decepticons, fear not fans! They look amazing! The special effects will knock you off your feet! And the action puts you right in the middle of the battles! Michael Bay knows his stuff, and he lets loose in this film.
What I disliked: There are far and few things that Transformers fails at. The only problems are the special effects make the alien robots so real it’s sometimes very hard telling whose who during the intense battles. And the battles themselves are so action packed it’s sometimes very hard to see what’s going on. Who’s that fighting? Who hit who? And where did he hit him?
Would I recommend?: This is a must see film for fans of the toys and fans of adrenalin rush movies. In the battle of the summer blockbusters, the Transformers come with their big guns blazing, and it appears they may have won the war!
9 our of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I liked: The 2nd half of the film. You are finally formally introduced to the Autobots and the Deceptacons. Once this happens, you become automatically sucked into the movie because you are completely caught up to speed of what the plot is about and where the story is going.
There were also splices of great comedy throughout the film by Bernie Mac and Anthony Anderson’s character, the computer nerd, and his family. This broke up the actions scenes nicely so you weren’t on edge the entire time.
Overall, a LOT of people will like this movie based on the transformer fighting sequences alone. A couple people in the theatre screamed, “BEST MOVIE EVER!” when it was over. Young males will flock to this film in droves.
What I disliked: The majority of the 1st half of the film. There are two action sequences in the 1st half of the film that were eye-catching. Other than that, you are spending about 30 minutes of the film trying to get used to Sam Witwicky, played by Shia LaBeouf, a bumbling hyper high school boy trying anything to sell his grandfather’s glasses on EBAY and pick up the obvious hot girl from school. The cliche hot girl with the school jock scenario and an average boy with a crush on her is so overplayed its almost unbearable to watch at this point. I thought they did that enough in cheesy 80’s movies but with more charm? If Michael Bay wanted to modernize the film with flashy CGI, he could have pumped up the script a bit too.
Also, if you are a stickler for the original transformers figures, you will fall somewhat disappointed as the vehicles are not the same as the originals.
Would I recommend?: Yes. This is going to be one of summer’s BIGGEST films. It has action, it has romance, it has family themes and it has lots of CGI. This is a recipe for summer movie success. It appeals to all age groups and nationalities thus stimualting your wallet to get tickets for opening week...and quickly.
7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
Advertisement
