|
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Spiderwick Chronicles.
What I Liked: I liked that it wasn’t afraid to be funny, scary, and action packed all in a single PG rated film. Parents and kids alike can enjoy the vivid fantasy and creativity of this story. If you like the Narnia and Harry Potter films, you will most likely like this one too.
What I Disliked: The mom was a completely unbelievable character. She was almost an unnecessary role period, but it’s hard to have a child geared film without a parental presence somewhere in the story (unfortunately). The various creatures and the kids stole the roles in this film by far!
Also, the child’s curious imagination overriding all logic is still an excellent recipe for a Young Fantasy film.
Would I Recommend?: Most definitely. What better way to spend a Friday night then with weird goblin creatures, a creepy old century house, curious kids with a mission and a bag of popcorn? Its just plain old good movie watching!
Score: 8 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: The Spiderwick Chronicles uses some of my favorite foods in its recipe for success: honey, oatmeal, salt, and tomato sauce. Each ingredient is necessary to help the Grace family, newly transplanted New Yorkers, to surmount the problems they encounter in their relative’s country estate. These “problems” just happen to be unbelievable creatures (fairies and goblins and an ogre, oh, my!), AND - Are you ready for this? - a book! Time passes quickly during The Spiderwick Chronicles, with incredibly animated creatures interacting with extraordinarily gifted and talented human actors. In the end, I cheered for misunderstood Jared Grace, his family, and their two fairy friends as they cook up one final sweet tasting victory – literally and figuratively.
What I Disliked: The only way the adventure can unfold is if rebellious, misunderstood Jared Grace ignores the dire warning note on a book, and reads it. How can reading any book be dangerous?? Subsequently, Jared is forced to use his newly acquired knowledge to vanquish an unseen foe. The creatures threatening him and his family are frightening, and sometimes nauseatingly real. They are also mesmerizing to behold.
Would I Recommend?: This is a movie for anyone wanting to cheer for a single mom and her kids, who must unite as one loving family to surmount seen and unseen problems – with the aid of a well-written book. You’ll also enjoy the action immensely if you believe (or want to believe) in a world of mythical creatures, benign as well as offensive, and impossible but satisfying endings.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: This film wastes no time getting us into the story and doesn’t let down throughout unlike some other children’s fantasy films. You will love the CG characters and voice acting by Martin Short, Seth Rogen and even Nick Nolte. For some odd reason, the film made me feel like I was watching Jumanji, and that’s a good thing.
What I Disliked: As much as I liked the action, the pacing and the CG elements, it still didn’t break many molds, as a film. As a story, I found it just as exciting as The Dark Is Rising which is based off of an excellent series of books, though the 2007 film totally missed the mark. I also kind of wish that Paramount would make this into a trilogy because I do believe they could’ve elaborated on many things no matter how cliche that decision might be.
Would I Recommend?: If you’re a twenty-something feeling lonely on a Friday night, then by all means, go enjoy this film. If not, I’d wait until it runs on HBO and just leave it to parents wanting take their kids for a nice weekend out to watch it in theaters. Another strange observation, the last fight between the lead character and the Nick Nolte monster resembled more than anything the Megatron chase on the rooftops in Transformers.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Fool’s Gold.
What I Liked: A movie of lush tropical vistas, voluptuous lead actresses and the stereotypical treasure hunt that is sprinkled with a lot of sexual innuendos, irony and humorous dialog that is entertaining, as long as you don’t over analyze the premise of the antagonist.
What I Disliked: The quirky unbelievable characters of the villain and his henchmen, whom appear to be more like caricatures with a parody on some sort of rapper mogul.
Would I Recommend?: If you are just looking for a good time with your date; this is a good movie for laughs, romance and adventure.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: Although I thought this was going to be a “chick flick,” it turned out to be a thoroughly enjoyable romantic comedy which my husband also enjoyed. The chemistry between McConaughey and Hudson is fantastic, as in their last movie together, and I enjoyed Alexis Dziena in her role.
What I Disliked: My only caution about this movie is there is some brief nudity so be careful with your teenagers.
Would I Recommend?: I would highly recommend this movie for a lighthearted evening out.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
What I Liked: I wanted to like this movie. The lush, gorgeous shots of the ocean (filmed in Australia) were breathtaking to see on the big screen. I like Matthew McConaughey, Kate Hudson and the chemistry they have together. Donald Sutherland is usually amazing, no matter what the role. Did I mention how beautiful the Australian beach scenes were?
What I Disliked: This movie tries to be all things to all people, but ends up being not much to anyone. Kate Hudson’s character Tess, a steward on a millionaire’s yacht, is finally divorcing her irresponsible husband of eight years, surfer dude and treasure hunter Finnigan (Matthew McConaughey), who has just discovered the 18th century Spanish “Queen’s booty” they’ve searched for all these years. On the run from his financier’s thugs, however, Finnigan can’t recover the treasure without Tess’s help and her millionaire boss’s financial support. “Fool’s Gold” starts out as a romantic comedy, turns into an action/adventure thriller, and finishes as an over-the-top, predictable jumble of genres and storylines. The only consistencies were the weak characters and the regular whacks to the head that Finnigan received throughout the movie.
Would I Recommend?: Only if you’re overwhelmed, overworked and in desperate need of vegging out with a big bucket of popcorn in front of a brightly colored, flimsy flick for a couple of hours. Otherwise, save your money.
Score: 2 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Over Her Dead Body.
What I Liked: Eva Longoria Parker plays an over protective ghost that begins haunting the psychic woman that her former fiance, played by Paul Rudd, begins to date. Eva does well playing a spiteful spirit that hasn’t moved on yet. Although the role is not anything new since I’m sure she has mastered the selfish spoiled role from her television show “Desperate Housewives”. As in most of his roles Paul Rudd is once again great as a sarcastic nice guy; but this time he shows a lot of feeling as the mourning widower. The surprise in this film is Lake Bell, who plays the psychic haunted by Eva’s ghost. She pulls off the quick humor, and the physical humor very well. The dialogue is smart, and the gags are humerous but not gut busting.
What I Disliked: Something just feels like it is missing in this film and I just can’t seem to put my finger on it. Perhaps it is the fact that we get to know hardly anything about the relationship between Rudd and Longoria Parker’s character except they loved one another. But was Eva’s character always a snobby woman or did she have any sweetness at all to her? Was she always so demanding, or was is it just because she loves her fiance so much? Because none of these questions are answered, you really don’t like Eva’s character and don’t really feel sorry for her. Or maybe what’s missing is Jason Biggs importance in the film. Sure he plays Lake Bell’s partner, but he just seems out of place. There doesn’t seem like he even needs to be in the film.
Would I Recommend?: While “Over Her Dead Body” is a cute movie, it isn’t anything really special. In truth you’ll probably forget about the film with in a few hours. But it is a film worth seeing if you’re with that special someone and you have nothing to do. Maybe you should see this as a Matinee, so you’ll still have other things to do together after the film.
Score: 4 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: I haven’t laughed that hard at a movie in years. I’ve never really watched Eva Longoria act and to be honest I feared she would be terrible in this role. I was truly surprised to find she is quite comical. Paul Rudd and Lake Bell had great on screen chemistry and brought their characters to life. The ending was predictable but I had such a good time seeing how the storyline moved towards the end that I was okay with knowing what was going to happen.
What I Disliked: The only thing I didn’t like about the movie was that towards the end the plot tried to go a really weird route. Sorry this is a spoiler-one character who confesses to pretending to be gay was just a scenario that the film could have done without.
Would I Recommend?: I would absolutely recommend this movie. It’s not just a chick flick. It had humor for both sexes. It’s laugh out loud and burst into applause funny!
Score: 8 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
What I Liked: The animals stole the show, especially the parrot. They seemed to be more committed to their roles than the actors. Paul Rudd, as the mourning fiancé, and Jason Biggs, as the assistant, are pleasant and appealing, and so are the women. But even though they are visually attractive, they lack substance and unique characteristics. It’s too much fluff, and not enough heart.
What I Disliked: The broad, slapstick humor can be uncomfortable to watch at times. Even though the audience’s laughter drowned out dialogue during the movie’s humorous anecdotes and one liners, the humor was minimal, failing to adequately sustain the film for 95 minutes.
Would I Recommend?: If you are looking for mindless entertainment, with some humorous moments, you’ll like it. This is a movie for single women who want a “girls night out.” Leave the men at home. It’s well intentioned, and we all know where the road to good intentions will lead.
Score: 3 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching U2 3D.
What I Liked: Shot during the “Vertigo” tour while in Argentina, this concert film highlights the grandness of U2’s latest tour in glowing fashion.
The 3D effects are best put to use in sweeping shots of the band and inserts featuring action at two different positions in the arena.
While mostly shot straight-forward, the film ends with an song interestingly enhanced by graphics (which also appeared on the large screen behind the band.)
The sound quality mostly keeps with the spirit of a concert experience, with appropriate levels of crowd noise.
U2’s talent and showmanship are undeniable. This movie just showcases that.
What I Disliked: Rock ‘n roll videos rely heavily on quick and flashy cuts; 3D movies don’t thrive on that. At certain points, not enough time is left to enjoy the 3D effect of a shot before we have moved on from it.
Blurring can also be a problem with the high energy motion of the concert.
Cheesy 3D set-ups are kept to a minimum, mostly instigated by Bono when the camera gets too close.
Would I Recommend?: For U2 fans, this film is a must. Also, if you want to see the band without all the pushing and beer-spilling, go see this movie. It’s also a prime example of how 3D film can be used in an innovative way. In any case, it’s well worth the experience.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: I thoroughly enjoyed U2 3D! This was my first 3D concert and it was indescribable! I felt as if I was literally on stage with the band! I could actually feel the energy of the audience! I definitely prefer this over physically being at a concert live! It was so nice to hear the music without all the distortion and crowd noise. It was great seeing the show from different angles, swooping in and out of the crowd and all around each band member. There are plenty of close ups that bring you much closer than any live performance could ever get you. The 3D overhead shots were stunning and would obviously be impossible to recreate in person. The visuals and sound quality were just amazing. What I loved most about U2 3D is that it’s full of fast paced, nonstop music without any boring behind-the-scenes footage or band interviews. I really hope more bands do this type of concert recording because I love it!
What I Disliked: At one point Bono flaps his arms gracefully as if he’s a bird in slow motion. Very un-cool. U2 3D loses a point for that. Bono randomly explores homoeroticism with the bassist, Adam Clayton, including a caress of the face and a kiss on the lips. It’s possible this happens at all their concerts and I’m completely ignorant, but it just sort of startled me and seemed out of place in the middle of trying to rock out. There was also no love for the guitarist, The Edge! I’m all for being open but I was unprepared for the dramatic display of love. After all, with the 3D I felt like I was right there having a threesome with them, which quite frankly is gross. Another point lost. Bono watered down some of the vocals at times, which I suppose is to be expected in any concert in general so he won’t lose a point for that. Finally, I got tired of U2’s message about religious and political coexistence. I do admire the message but sometimes I just want to rock out for the sake of the music, not for an agenda. When they used the song “One” as an analogy for the similarities between Argentina and Ireland I was a little offended by the stretch of the imagination there. Please let the song be what the lyrics are actually about, or let the song be what I want it to be about, but please don’t disgrace the song by having it mean eight thousand different things depending upon which political message you’re trying to get across that night. Another point lost for messing up “One.”
Would I Recommend?: Yes, this is a must see for all U2 fans!
Score: 7 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
What I Liked: U2 3D is really like being at a concert. But not just in the audience. The cameras bring you on stage, up above, behind the drums, and much more. The results of the technology of this movie are really magical and hard to explain unless witnessed. It brings a major concert to life. But with better seats than you could ever normally afford.
What I Disliked: U2 3D is strictly a concert movie. Not a “Rattle and Hum” or “Truth or Dare” where they show backstage goings-ons. Just U2 on stage for 85 minutes. After a few songs, the magic of the 3D-ness wears off and it feels like you are just at a U2 concert. Which is great if you are a U2 fan, but if you are not it can get boring.
Would I Recommend?: For U2 and rock lovers alike, this is definitely an amazing experience. But if you could care less about Bono’s drone or The Edge’s guitar playing, you’d probably be better off passing.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching 27 Dresses.
What I Liked: Katherine Heigl and James Marsden have good chemistry in this romantic comedy about a girl who has been a bridesmaid 27 times. Heigl, who recently starred in the hit film “Knocked Up,” fits her role well as Jane, the perpetual bridesmaid. She has many funny moments showing her frustration with always being the bridesmaid and never finding Mr. Right. Marsden plays Kevin, a newspaper writer who regularly covers local weddings and can’t seem to decide if writing the big story and furthering his career is more important than pursuing Jane. Judy Greer provides a lot of laughs and is great playing the promiscuous best friend of Jane.
What I Disliked: Marsden’s character lacks drive. He does a decent job in this role but he could have been great. His character seems too relaxed. He doesn’t have enough drive about his career or his personal life. He never shows enough energy or excitement, especially about the potential romance with Jane. Malin Akerman, who plays Jane’s self-obsessed younger sister, is boring, annoying, and never should never have been cast in this movie.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, it’s pretty good for a girly date movie.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: Don’t let the title or trailers fool you. This isn’t your run of the mill chick flick. This movie was very entertaining for everyone. Even the manliest will laugh and may learn something too. I got more than I bargained for with this movie. It was laugh-out-loud funny and touching at the same time. The cast was well planned and the story very well portrayed. The soundtrack was great too. I was singing and dancing in my seat when I was laughing my head off. I related well with the main character. I was especially glad to see that although nice guys (or gals) may finish last, they can finish happily ever after. And I won’t even mention the dresses, you’ll have to see them for yourself. LOL My only regret is that I didn’t invite my date thinking he wouldn’t like it. Oh well, he’ll catch it at home on DVD. I will definitely buy it.
What I Disliked: What’s not to like? You’d have to be heartless not to find something hilarious and touching about this movie. I do think that the male love interest’s story could have been built up a bit more. I thought they’d show us how he came to be like the main character in the beginning. That could have been fun. Oh yeah and what’s with all the soap opera rejects in the cast? For you ABC network soap fans out there, I found all the latest missing actors. They left to do this movie. LOL
Would I Recommend?: I recommend this flick for all audiences. You can’t go wrong with this movie. It is good for the whole family or as a date movie. I even enjoyed it alone. Don’t miss this one.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I Liked: This is a smart, funny movie. It’s well-paced, without the interminable slow patches that beset some comedies. Judy Greer is excellent in her “best friend” role, adding a very welcome ascerbic element to the proceedings with her sharp dialogue. She helps ensure that the movie stays light but not completely frothy.
What I Disliked: I enjoy romantic comedies. However, I can see that the relatively standard formula of this “chick flick”, with some of its more contrived plot twists might make it less appealing to some moviegoers.
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend it highly. It’s both well-written and well- cast. Katherine Heigl and James Marsden make an appealing couple with believable chemistry, while the secondary roles are also strong. This plot will resonate with every woman who has ever been a bridesmaid and, hence, by definition has some monstrosity of a dress hanging at the back of her closet.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Bucket List.
What I Liked: The two best things about this humorous and moving film are easy to name: Morgan Freeman (Carter) and Jack Nicholson (Edward). The interaction between these two veteran actors makes you wonder why someone hasn’t put them together before this.
The script by Justin Zackman offers a well-paced plot and plenty of laughs, all the while bringing home an important point about life. Rob Reiner provides his usual solid direction, allowing his talented actors to work their magic.
Outside of the main characters, Sean Hayes as Edward’s assistant shows a subtler side to his acting than that in his “Will & Grace” days.
What I Disliked: This is the type of movie that relies heavily on what an viewer brings with them. I found myself quiet and moved during times that many in the audience laughed out loud. Possibly (because of the advertising associated with the movie), some audience members think this film was supposed to be a straight comedy, but it is much more. This at times may be a bit confusing for some.
Would I Recommend?: I’d definitely recommend this movie. The acting, humor and message are all there to make a wonderful film.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: The various global landscapes ranging from the coast of France to the Great Wall of China to the famous breath-taking Pyramids of Cairo. Seeing all this beauty makes you forget, for a moment, how depressing it is to see two of the greatest actors of all time dying before your eyes.
What I Disliked: It seemed contrived. Let’s put two amazing aged actors together to make a blockbuster about a scenario that is highly unlikely. I think Nicholson and Freeman have some steam left to make a couple more films before they ‘kick the bucket’.
Would I Recommend?: Not to any of my friends. A certain group of people would appreciate this film for its last minute thrill rides and cheap laughs before death. Others will be sprinting to a comedy to make them feel invincible once again.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: A sentimental journey with two men of terminal proportions that take on the frailty and impermanence of life, while playing off each others strengths and weaknesses; that tugs at your heart. They seek to satisfy the essence of life’s journey and the inherent meaning therein. Both actors seem to draw on portions of their previous picture roles, such as Nicholson in ‘A Few Good Men’ and Freedman channels a God like quality when describing the spiritual in life.
What I Disliked: Some of the sequences seem to be underdeveloped or just extremely edited, and could use more transitions as they come across like snapshots in a photo album. The humor depends a lot on one liner’s, although there are a few that follow the storyline for buildup. Also some of the sets appear to be done in a studio with backdrops, instead of true location, which loses the life quest quality.
Would I Recommend?: In general family-social-dynamics, this would be a good option, but not a must see.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Charlie Wilson’s War.
What I Liked: This is a very well-written movie with award-winning acting. I’m not surprised it has been nominated for numerous Golden Globes. As a political movie, it truly makes one think without pushing a point of view down your throat.
What I Disliked: The fake Texan accents by Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts were grating on the ears, but there was some respite when Hanks lost his Southern accent.
Would I Recommend?: I would definitely recommend this movie, but be careful when taking small children as some of the war scenes and affects are graphic. There is also quite a bit of nudity at the beginning of the movie.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
What I Liked: I wasn’t expecting much from Charlie Wilson’s War because the previews I have seen didn’t leave me with a desire to see this movie. I was pleasantly surprised, however, that I enjoyed the movie very much.
From the opening scene, Charlie Wilson is shown as a hard drinking, womanizing, irresponsible congressman. Despite these looming personality flaws, Tom Hanks portrays Wilson in such a way that he immediately becomes lovable and you don’t mind spending an hour and a half with him. Julia Roberts gives an unexceptional performance as Joanne Herring, a Texas socialite who uses her womanly wares to entice Wilson to join her cause. Persuaded by Joanne, Wilson uses his influence to raise the budget and help Afghanistan defeat the Russians. Wilson and Herring are joined by a CIA agent named Gust who is played by the man with three names, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and the trio accomplishes many wonderful and amazing things.
This movie is based on a true story and some of the scenes are actual footage from the events. The footage reminds the audience that we are watching a real story, and that this man really did these things.
Because of the political plot, I immediately expected to see an underlying agenda. I was relieved to discover that this film was objective. It does not paint the US as a good guy or a bad buy. It merely tells what happened to Charlie. Despite the heavy plot, the dialogue was witty and the film was very funny.
What I Disliked: I was highly disappointed in Julia Roberts’ performance. Her poor performance distracted from the otherwise enjoyable film.
Would I Recommend?: Yes. This was a very funny and entertaining movie.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story.
What I Liked: In this comedy that follows the rise and fall and rise of fictional singer Dewey Cox, John C. Reilly does a good job of portraying the small town boy that follows his dream. Or rather in this case, his dead brothers dream. The film follows the outline of all biopics, including a horrible tragic beginning, the period when the star gets full of himself, and even the drugged out period. John C. Reilly portrays each period of the life perfectly, and humorously. Jenna Fisher from “The Office” fame is also good as she plays the Christian good girl who catches Dewey Cox’s eye and heart. Tim Meadows steals the film though in a scene where he first introduces Dewey to Marijuana, and explains its effects. It is probably the best scene in the entire movie. The meeting with the Beatles is also pretty humorous for the first couple of moments, but then the scene gets old. When the writers and the director keep to satirizing biopics the film comes across as intelligent.
But the film continues to revert back to just flat out dumb immature jokes we’ve seen before.
What I Disliked: Sadly, for one of those “stupid comedies”, the bust your gut jokes are very few. Sure there are some scenes you’ll chuckle, maybe even laugh at, but most of the movie you’ll roll your eyes or groan at another attempted joke. And although its fun to see how music changes era to era, the writers seem to skip right over the 80’s. That’s a shame, because it would have been funny to see how Dewey views the 80s music as he wears a keyboard tie.
Would I Recommend?: Sometimes its worth seeing stupid comedies at the theater. Sometimes it is not. “Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story” is not worth paying the $8.50 for. This film is one of those comedies you watch on tv, in between commercials of something else you are watching.
Score: 5 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: Walk Hard is a movie for true comedy lovers, or should I say good comedy lovers. Not the lovers of the comedies where Eddie Murphy stars as thirteen different characters all revolving around a science experiment gone awry. But the ironic, satirical, sarcastic kind of comedy that mainstream America thinks is over the top or, dare I say, just doesn’t get.
Everyone who’s anyone in the new generation of comedy pops up for cameos, supporting or starring roles. Actors from today’s great movies and TV shows including Superbad, Knocked Up, The Office, Saturday Night Live, 30 Rock and many more.
John C. Reilly finally gets a starring role in what may not be as meaty as his roles in Magnolia or Boogie Nights but still shows his diversity and talent as one of today’s best actors.
What I Disliked: Like 80 precent of most comedies, it lags in some spots and some jokes fall flat. Some of the songs could have been a little smarter and less obvious.
Would I Recommend?: This is definitely not your grandmother’s movie. But for fan’s of the Judd Apatow (who co-wrote and co-produced) school of film, it is definitely a must see. It may not be an Oscar caliber move but it may be a Golden Globe caliber movie for Reilly was just nominated for his role. As a comedy lover, it is a good way to spend two hours. And I dare you to try and get one of the many catchy songs out of your head after seeing it.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching I Am Legend.
What I Liked: I think this film is above average for a zombie/end-of-the-human-race movie; it’s not quite on the level of “28 Days Later,” but still pretty good. Will Smith did a good job, especially in the emotional scenes involving his only friend who’s played by a dog. The film doesn’t have that cheap B movie feel like most films in this genre. The special effects were great; the zombies in particular looked very real and scary. The zombie growls definitely get an A.
What I Disliked: The ending is a bit of a let down. I won’t spoil it but it’s very predictable and typical. I feel Will Smith’s character has too many talents – he’s a doctor, he’s Rambo, he’s got abs of steel, he’s immune to the zombie inducing disease…maybe he should fly, too? He was a bit too much like a superhero which doesn’t really fit with this type of story.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, if you really like Will and zombies then go see it. If not, it’s at least a good rental.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: Will Smith is the best thing about this movie. He continuously proves that he is an amazing actor that can take any role and make it real. I truly believed I was watching the diary of the last man on Earth. It was easy to connect to his emotions and feel what he was feeling. This film is very thought provoking.
The thought of being alone scares me now even though there are people all over the world. To wake up one day and find not only are you alone in your apartment, but also in the entire world scares me even more. I can’t imagine a life of quiet. As I think about this film in the future maybe now I won’t mind a baby crying or a guy at a red light flipping me off for not going when it turns green. Interaction with people is something this film will enable me to enjoy now more than ever.
What I Disliked: The quietness of the film made it difficult to watch at times. Because of the fact it’s just a man and an empty city I kept thinking something was going to jump out and attack. After seeing so many scary movies in the past and then seeing Will Smith’s character exploring the empty city it’s easy to expect another man or woman come around the corner with a knife and kill the ‘good guy.’
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I would recommend this film because it is frighteningly believable. It makes for great conversation and helps you appreciate what you have.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
What I Liked: Will Smith was outstanding as the lonely scientist-turned-survivor Dr. Neville. The story revolves around one man who has survived a deadly virus and has lived alone in New York City for years, continually searching for supplies, survivors and scientific breakthroughs. A weaker actor in such a large role would have made the film unbearable, but Smith expertly blends sadness, intelligence and madness into a believable and memorable character.
The special effects used to create the eerie, run-down, lonely version of New York were well-done.
What I Disliked: The CGI-created “zombies” were neither memorable nor moving; we’ve seen the same thing a dozen times before (quite often in a more-terrifying version than as seen here).
The film provided very little backstory. The brief storyline—reconstructed through flashbacks – jumps from the announcement of a major medical breakthough to an inefficiently-handled evacuation of Manhattan to Neville living alone in his well-stocked and well-protected fortress of an apartment. What happened in between? And why was Neville featured on the news magazine cover displayed on his refrigerator? (Did he help create the original virus or did he just come the closest to finding a cure?)
To me, the brief mention of religion and the will of God towards the end of the film seemed like an afterthought. That scene was too quick to spark any meaningful dialogue and too perfunctory to add dimension to the characters.
Would I Recommend?: This is not a run-of-the-mill, mindless horror movie, by any means, even though there are zombies (sort of). It’s more of a psychological terror/thriller and it’s worth seeing.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Golden Compass.
What I Liked: The movie adaptation of a Philip Pullman novel draws you in with epic visuals and astounding effects. While the story is adequete, the design of the landscapes and its creatures is breath-taking. It’s something not seen since the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy.
What I Disliked: Too much story and not enough of an ending. With a concede that it’s the first of a series of movies, “Compass” wraps up quickly with a epilogue of what to expect in the coming films. Couple that with the amount of exposition you need to absorb (especially if you have never read the books) and the movie feels a bit rushed.
Would I Recommend?: I would definitely recommend the film with a warning to parents that scenes may be too intense for younger children, including some sudden scares and violence against animals.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: The way you feel about the main character, Lyra. It reminds us all to never underestimate the mind of a child. Their innate innocence mixed with the power to not let fears overcome them is truly extraordinary to view. Myra has a gift, she knows it, and she isn’t afraid to use it-even on creatures 30 times her size. This is quite advanced thinking for such a young girl.
Also, the ice bear fight scene made most of the audience lay still in their seats. Dolby Surround Sound at its best!
What I Disliked: The story moves along so quickly to the point where main characters are in and out of a scene before you try to figure out which Bond film you saw them in. Don’t sneeze or budge in the beginning, you might miss what the whole premise of the film is about. In essense, it is too rushed which makes a lot of the story feel hoaxy and thrown together haphazardly. Bring on the three hour blockbuster fantasy, we have learned to love them after Lord of the Rings.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, especially if you have children. Even though the film did seem inexcusably rushed, you walk out wishing you had a daemon animal to call your own.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: It told a good story. I wasn’t really looking forward to seeing this movie as it reminded me of Narnia and Tarabithia. However,I was actually very much taken in and enjoyed all the while. The portrayal, characters and costumes were good. It was a great tale of the triumph of good over evil. Though I don’t know of the novel, it was easy to follow and understand the plot.
What I Disliked: Not much on cgi and special effects and the fight scenes weren’t very graphic either.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I would recommend it. It isn’t actually a children’s movie but with some explaination, I think anyone can enjoy.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Enchanted.
What I Liked: There are many stories that the Walt Disney World company can tell very well, but none as well as the classic fairy tale. In their latest film Enchanted, Disney crosses the worlds of the magical fairy tale with the real world of New York, with hilarious consequences, all while still keeping the ideas and the feelings that true love can conquer all. Amy Adams is delightful as she portrays the doe eyed naive Giselle, transported to New York courtesy of Susan Sarandon as Queen Narissa, evil stepmother of Prince Edward. Amy Adams has the Disney Princess thing down pat as she sings about every thing, even cleaning of course, and how to impress the woman you love. Susan Sarandon’s performance will surprise you and will remind you of Glenn Close’s surprise delivery of her role as Cruella Devile. James Marsden, known mostly for his action roles in such films as X-men and Superman Returns, is fantastic showing his comedic talent as the brave but simple minded Prince. Patri ck Dempsey who plays Robert, the New York man who cant help himself in aiding the lost princess is remarkable as the straight man. He really comes across as lost in the weirdness that follows Giselle, and a nonbeliever in fairy tales and happy endings. He really brings the human aspect on love and reminds us how we all tend to forget that we make our own fairy tales. The story is actually really well written and will bring out many laughs, especially for the Disney fan. Just try not to laugh as the differences of the cute forest animals and the animals in New York come to light for the Princess. Disney fans, keep an eye out for several Disney references.
What I Disliked: With all the talk about romance its kind of a bummer to see the real world intrude on fantasy relationships. Gone are the days of love at first site. The new fairy tale shows how you have to work at relationships. It would also be nice to see more explanation on why Robert is still dating his girlfriend after five years. If that spark is missing, let us see it. Or is he just not working hard enough at the relation ship. If he isn’t, again, then why? Is there no spark?
Would I Recommend?: Children will love this film. Families will love being able to see this film together. Disney fans will love this film. And those who love fairy tales and funny but happy endings most definitly should see this film. Disney will make you remember what it is like to believe in romance, and everyone can live happily ever after...with a little work.
Score: 7 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: ENCHANTED lives up to its name! Almost everything about the movie is enchanting from its two locations (“happy ever after” Andalasia vs. “happy never after” New York City) to its multi-dimensional characters (campy cartoons vs. reality survivors). Pip, the endearing chipmunk, steals the show in both worlds. Amy Adams, as Giselle the intrepid, out of her element Princess, is a perfect foil for Patrick Dempsey’s Robert, the staid and logical NYC lawyer who attempts to help her find her way home. Both have true loves, but their providential meeting alters their perceptions not only of love, but of friends, family, and life in general.
What I Disliked: The stereotyping of characters, and some continuity errors, were a little disconcerting. Yet the metamorphosis of those characters into believable people and the engaging storyline eradicated all of these concerns.
Would I Recommend?: If you love fairy tales, and their inevitable happy endings, see this movie. ENCHANTED is a movie in which almost everyone finds his or her true heart’s desire, which could be exasperating for cynics, anyone who has no interest in romantic love, and those who abhor show stopping musical numbers.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: I liked the silliness of this film. It was so cheesy that I couldn’t help but laugh at most of it. I’ve often snickered at some Disney films and it was kind of nice to see Disney make fun of themselves as well. This movie was fun and family friendly. It’s a nice change from blood, guts, horror and foul language.
What I Disliked: I didn’t like how the movie seemed to go a bit overboard in the portrayal of the characters. I also didn’t like how easy it was to figure out the ending, but I guess it’s to be expected for a film like this.
Would I Recommend?: I would definitely recommend Enchanted to families because there are jokes for kids and adults. In that sense it’s like Shrek because it makes fun of fairy tales while making all ages laugh. It’s a good clean movie.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Mist.
What I Liked: To say I enjoyed this movie is an understatement. As an avid reader of Stephen King’s novels, I often feel the movie versions of his stories leave much to be desired. The Mist, however, was intense, horrifying, and funny. I left the theater feeling that Stephen King himself would have been jumping, gasping, and cheering along with the rest of the audience. Thomas Jane and Marcia Gay Harden gave captivating performances often leaving you no choice but to root for (or against) them. Frank Darabont, who is no stranger to directing King films, does a great job in his latest thriller.
What I Disliked: At times, the creatures coming from the mist were a bit too fantastical to be entirely believable. In addition, the ending was somewhat predictable.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I recommend this movie! It was wonderfully frightening and exciting.
Stephen King fans will appreciate the inside references to his other stories.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
What I Liked: I expected next to nothing from Darabont’s adaptation of this novella from King that he wrote about 30 years ago. I was proved wrong. Many of King’s works have been about the supernatural and sci-fi, but almost all of them have been about human behavior. I really haven’t seen a good rational science fiction story like this in a little while. Talk about character development and interaction. Also, Mist doesn’t expect much from viewers save for occasional cheers or boos.
What I Disliked: I will say it, the film is pretty offensive. There is a character in the film who is a hysterical Christian evangelist and that’s all I’ll say, I’ll let you make up your own mind about that. One last thing, I loved the ending, but many of you will not, because you will be shocked, and angered, and saddened by it. I repeat, “angered.”
Would I Recommend?: Darabont parks you in your seat but doesn’t purposely try to scare you. And contrary to many horror films, Darabont doesn’t use the sci-fi elements of this film to frighten; the characters themselves and their actions will give you enough of a chill. Oh and the visuals, impressive and exciting. A word of advice, if you still feel wretched inside a few hours after viewing, it’s perfectly understandable, go watch “Evolution.”
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
What I Liked: This is the best horror movie I’ve seen in years! Stephen King has once again perfected the art of terror. “The Mist” hits on the basic universal fears of spiders, bugs, alien creatures, government experimentation, and mob mentality. Parts of the plot are reminiscent of a “Lord of the Flies” for adults. What sets “The Mist” apart from your average blood and guts horror movie is the intense, sophisticated psychology that drives fear into the audience, rather than relying purely on special effects and startling noises like so many movies do. Similar to “Pet Sematary,” the scariest element of “The Mist” is how we see the characters bring about their own demise. Inherent human reactions to fear, loss, and trauma cause the characters to take gruesome, self-destructive actions. The most terrifying thing of all is that we become so involved in the movie that we can almost see ourselves having taken those same actions, making the biggest monster – the biggest cause for fear - lie within ourselves.
What I Disliked: I wasn’t thrilled with Thomas Jane’s performance as the main character. His acting in this movie is pretty stiff and I felt the movie could have gone even further if the main character had been able to show a wider range of emotions.
Would I Recommend?: I definitely recommend this movie because it’s a lot better than your typical Hollywood formula horror film - that being said, don’t whine and pout that the ending isn’t going to be cheerful for the survivors.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Lions for Lambs.
What I Liked: There is a good but brief performance by Tom Cruise as a conservative US senator. I like that Cruise’s character says the government has made mistakes in Iraq, but that they are developing a plan to try to improve the situation and boost morale. Whether the plan works or not, I like the idea of admitting mistakes and trying to move forward despite those past mistakes. There is a nice show of patriotism by two soldiers who were former students of professor Malley (Redford). Meryl Streep does a good job playing the part of a liberal news reporter; she seemed very much like our real media that attacks our government’s war on terror.
What I Disliked: There have been a handful of new films lately that focus on bashing our government for the handling of Iraq. “Lions for Lambs” is no different. For example, Meryl Streep’s character doesn’t care what the government’s new plan is, she just can’t wait to write a negative piece and do her best to make senator (Cruise) look bad. Professor Malley (Redford) also has some really boring scenes with a so-called gifted student and Redford makes a strong point that he is totally against his two former students having joined the military to fight in the war on terror. Instead of constructive criticism, all I hear about is getting our troops out immediately and what a horrible job the president is doing. I feel that regardless of your position on the war, we have troops deployed in hostile territories and we should be supporting these guys and hope that we can get the job done. It’s difficult for me to enjoy a movie that hardly touches on positives or how to move forward from he re, but instead has an overall theme of putting down the efforts we’ve made to improve Iraq and fight terrorism. It’s a lot easier to criticize what has been done than to offer practical solutions for the future. I feel this sort of constant negative press is damaging to our country; it lowers our pride as Americans and shows the rest of the world that we are not united. Aside from the political brainwashing, the film offers endless talking and little action. With such a talented cast, director Robert Redford could have made this film more engrossing no matter what the viewers’ stance on the issues.
Would I Recommend?: No, there is nothing new or original here for this genre.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: Excellent performances by all the leads - Streep, Cruise and Redford. Cruise, in particular, inhabits his role as a rising young polital star. Well-written script covering complex subject matter in a nuanced manner. No-one is pilloried for their opinion - all the protagonists have personally reasonable and understandable viewpoints.
What I Disliked: I really savored this movie, but it might not qualify as the ideal choice for light entertainment at the end of a hard week.
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend it highly. The subject matter, which tends to be divisive is approached in an adult manner that represents competing convictions as justifiable and valid - giving dignity to a debate that oftens sinks to a level of personal attacks.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
What I Liked: Thank god for Oscar season. After a summer of movies filled with action but lacking much else, it is nice to finally see a movie that has in it everything a movie is supposed to have. Lions for Lambs doesn’t just touch upon the current issues of the Iraq war; it left hooks them dead on. (And a very “left” hand it is.) The movie is broken up into three different parts, all giving us pieces to the same story. Tom Cruise, as the smiling Republican senator, Meryl Streep as the liberal reporter, Robert Redford as the even more liberal college professor; who all prove why they are paid the big bucks as actors. But the two actors that really capture the heart of the film are Michael Pena and Derek Luke, who play the two soldiers (and former students of Redford’s) currently fighting in the war. These three sides show three sides of America: those living in fear, those trying to make a change by getting others to stop living in fear and the soldiers who are entrenched and therefore don’t have time to waste on fear.
Redford put faces, names and personalities to the soldiers that are fighting in the war a lot of people are trying to stop, solve or just ignore. He gives the reasons why people would enlist to fight a seemingly endless and pointless war. He gives them respect and value.
What I Disliked: A few hours after the movie, after emotions subsided, it was easier to see some of the not so perfect things to the movie. But the imperfections are few and far between, and they do not take away from the movie’s powerful message.
Would I Recommend?: I highly recommend Lions for Lambs. In making this movie, Redford has made a strong statement which is not necessarily focused on being for or against the war. He is trying to get our minds out of the bubble gum cloud of our pop culture society; to stop being so apathetic and to start paying attention to what matters. Lions for Lambs is especially emotionally impactful because it deals with right now, right here. This may be a little too much for many people who use movies to escape their everyday for there is no escaping in this movie. But you do realize how small your problems are in comparison to the world as a whole. And that there are people in the world who are living, caring and doing as many of us sit around while watching it all on tv.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching American Gangster.
What I Liked: The acting. Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe have come a long way since starring together in 1995’s Virtuosity. Although they do not have too much screen time together, when they do finally connect, their chemistry is right on. Denzel, in particular, has captured the role of the villain you love to hate even better than in Training Day. There is Oscar buzz written all over both of their roles.
What I Disliked: The editing. When the movie begins, there is no real introduction of characters. You are just thrown right in to the meat of it and it takes some time to get used to what is happening around you. Nothing in particular sucks you into the plot of the film. Also, if you are adverse to needles, you will be turning your head away from the screen more than once.
Would I Recommend?: Yes and No. Yes, because the acting is truly fun to watch. You want to see what happens next with both main characters. No, because this film had the potential to be phenomenal but it falls short in the editing room which causes a lot of overall frustration. The miriad of trailers that have run for this film make it look much more exciting and monumental then it really turns out to be.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: Director Ridley Scott nudges an unstoppable force rolling toward and immovable object at the beginning of this tale of the rise and fall of a 1970s Harlem crime lord. Denzel Washington portrays Frank Lucas, who inherits the reins of his bosses burgeoning street businesses and turned them into an empire by focusing on heroin trafficking. Do-good New Jersey cop Richie Roberts, played by Russell Crowe, finds himself ostracized by his fellow officers, most of who are corrupt, and leads a specially formed drug task force. Based on a true story, the tight script, brilliant direction and strong performances by its leads keeps this film evenly paced and engaging.
What I Disliked: While the lead characters are well drawn with all their strengths and flaws, the minor characters that help support the story could have been better developed during the 2 1/2 hour film. This is especially true of Frank’s inner circle, mainly comprised of his inexperienced brothers brought in after Lucas has become well-established.
Would I Recommend?: American Gangster pulls no punches, providing well-rounded characters to follow and moments of humor offset with intense drama. It ranks as one of the best American crime films since Sergio Leone’s “Once Upon a Time in America.”
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: Oscar winner Denzel Washington does it again! American Gangster is awesome! Now being a female, I am not really into ganster, drug and shoot ‘em up movies. However, this movie is really much more. It gives a wonderfully crafted portrayal of Frank Lucas’ story and so much more. You get to see both sides of the fence in the battle of drug lords, junkies and the law enforcers. There are so many stories told here but you never get lost or bored. They do a great job of keeping each story separate in itself and then they come together seamlessly for a great movie. Ofcourse Denzel did his usual stunning job of the portrayal of Frank Lucas. However, you have to give credit to all of the actors in this film as they all deserve an award. Russel Crowe, though not his usual star role, made a great impact as a ‘good cop’ slash dad. There’s also so many others in the star studded cast that I didn’t expect like Cuba Gooding Jr., Josh Brolin, Chjwetel Ejiofor, Ruby Dee and not able rappers like Common, T. I. and RZA of the WuTang Clan. Everyone did an equally convincing job. You learn a lot about the underworld of drugs and crime as well as the plights and corruption of law enforcement which longs to keep our country safe for all. You find yourself feeling sympathy and a sorted sense of pride for the supposed ‘bad guy’ in Frank as a family man, husband and intellectual ‘entrepreneur’ as it was. However, you’ll find a new respect for the police force and narcotics squads or a lack there of in some cases. The costumes, makeup and music were great and the sets were on the mark. I am originally from New Jersey and that is exactly how I remember it as a little girl raised in the ‘hood’ during the 70’s. Everything was well played down to the police losing their lungs climbing the stairs of the projects, talk about reality!
What I Disliked: There is not anything to dislike about this movie. It is rather graphic and straight forward in its depictions. But it is the fact that they ‘keep it real’ with no sugar coating that makes this movie great. It is a harsh reality to learn the facts that the movie teaches: the death toll and broken families due to drug abuse, the extent of the corruption in our law enforcement and how vulnerable we are at times as a country. However, every fact helps us deal as a people in our struggle to survive. You learn a lot here, maybe a little too much for some. No kids allowed. If you are a guy and you like a lot of extreme action, killing and fighting, you may be a bit disappointed. From what I thought I heard of Frank Lucas, I thought there’d be much more brain guts on the floor, especially with the opening scene. However, though not much on action and shoot outs, this movie keeps your interest peaked from beginning to end.
Would I Recommend?: I highly recommend this movie. I strongly advise against taking small children as there is a lot of nudity, profanity and too many things to explain afterward. If you don’t have a strong stomache or mindset, brace yourself. Also, your influencial young teens shouldn’t see this alone either. You’ll need to stress how wrong things are although very glamorous. I guess it is no different than the videos they watch daily, but we just don’t want them getting any bad ideas. Otherwise, come out on opening week and enjoy this great re-enactment of an awesome true story.
Score: 10 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Darjeeling Limited.
What I Liked: The story centered around three brothers who go on a journey to try to reconnect with each other. Owen Wilson was his typically goofy self while Adrian Brody and Jason Schwartzman were delightfully weird. Anything that could happen to them, did happen. I enjoyed the movie. The cast kept you interested and entertained from beginning to end. The movie was funny but not spectacular. Ultimately, it was a humorously moving story about family and finding yourself.
What I Disliked: At some points the humor was a little too subtle. Also, there were a lot of cast members repeated from Wes Anderson’s other movies. I, for one, would like to see some new faces.
Would I Recommend?: If you aren’t a fan of Wes Anderson’s previous films, you probably won’t like this one either.
However, if have enjoyed his other movies, this one is right up your alley.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
What I Liked: Comedy through dialog, innuendos and irony; the brothers are a codependent, dysfunctional trio that blaze a trail through some of the most exotic and harried portions of India and the Himalayas. Through bustling markets, city streets and remote villages, they try to reconcile family issues and restore there bond.
‘The Darjeeling Limited’ doesn’t insult our intelligence with silly slapstick humor, although sometime twisted and bizarre, it’s at least original, and absurd.
Just the situational ironies, contrast upon the backdrop of this mysterious and majestic land is entertaining. But together with the comedic and sometimes somber antics of these three and the typical family idiosyncrasies; Darjeeling presents a well rounded movie experience, good for many laughs and a unique cultural experience.
What I Disliked: The ending could have been further developed along with the character of their Mother.
Would I Recommend?: Recommend this to anyone with an appreciation for unique cinematic settings, and bizarre interpersonal psychological character plots.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: One thing you can always count on in a Wes Anderson film is humor and unbelievable quirkiness. Whether you’ll enjoy it...well, have you seen Rushmore or Royal Tenenbaums?
What I Disliked: Anderson smudges up some parts of the film with some un-Anderson-esque elements. I think the film would have been more complete had he added 20 more minutes and filled in some gray areas.
Would I Recommend?: Anderson has dealt with every kind of humanoid relationship already in his other films, so why expect more from Darjeeling? Can we ever get enough of brothers rolling around on the ground, fighting and spraying each other with mace, all the while swearing they love each other. Also, Wilson, Brody and Schwartzman deliver Anderson’s words magically.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
Advertisement
