|
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Speed Racer.
What I Liked: You’ve seen the clips on TV right? Well, my eyes still feel strange from all the colors, but in a good way. You remember the psychedelic boat sequence from “Willy Wonka?” This kicks the power way up, all the way to 11. The Wachowski’s know exactly how to tell the story about not only speed and power, but one of heart and family. You can tell right off the bat that this isn’t going to be the same caliber as the “Matrix” films, well, not in the sense of the subject matter. But in another sense it is the same. They’re both about one person having to work with others to fight for the right cause, but in the end, he must triumph as the one, the only, the best.
What I Disliked: Where I believe “Speed” stumbles over itself at times, at least for me, are when the inner kid movie pops out. Yes, those moments are still executed skillfully but sometimes I just want to experience an intense scene between two people without it having to be immediately counterbalanced by an extremely kiddy one with a kid and his chimp. And also, I don’t think the film would have been so kid-friendly if the Wachowski’s had gotten to make the film they wanted, but neither the studio nor Joel Silver were going to let this film be made without constant input and commentary.
Would I Recommend?: Sure “Speed” is a kid flick, but this proves that not only Pixar and Dreamworks can get adults into the theaters and have them actually enjoy it. If this proves successful, look forward to the Wachowski’s next film; I can guarantee that it’ll be going back to their roots. I say, grab your children or someone else’s and go watch it and prepare to be dazzled.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
What I Liked: I must confess up front that I’ve never seen the 60s cartoon, so I have no idea how faithful the film is to the original Speed Racer characters (Mom and Pops Racer; brothers Rex, Speed and Spritle; Speed’s girlfriend Trixie; Chim-Chim the chimp; mysterious Racer X) or the storylines. I must also confess that I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, even though it’s the cinematic equivalent of a large, overstuffed bag of brightly-colored cotton candy: deliciously manufactured fun without any nutritional value. The colors in the film are enhanced to a surreal brightness, the effects are fast and furious, and the tight close-ups and cyclorama-style flashbacks create a comic book virtual reality world never before seen on film. It’s a Tron-Willy Wonka-Dick Tracy-Roger Rabbit mash up and it’s amazing to see on the big screen.
What I Disliked: The storyline about teenage Speed Racer and the Racer family (the Good Guys) versus the evil, greedy, rich businessman Mr. Royalton and his henchmen (the Bad Guys) is pretty simple and familiar. With the eye-popping visuals as entertainment, the movie can get by with this, whereas a less effects-driven movie could not.
I was disappointed in the film’s portrayal of its female characters. With their heavily made-up plasticine faces, skin-tight clothes and sterotypical roles, the female characters were reduced to sleek, fetishized objects similar to the infamous Mach 5 racecar. The few scenes towards the end of the movie depicting female characters racing and fighting didn’t ring true and seemed added on merely to add a “girl power” vibe.
Would I Recommend?: Yes. It’s a breathtaking, mind-blowing, colorfully surreal experience that’s worth seeing for the effects alone.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
What I Liked: Speed Racer goes there. It is a fun family film with something for everyone. Even if you aren’t a long time fan of the original animated series, you’ll enjoy this movie. I recall watching this as a kid but I don’t remember it as well as say Transformers. However, I thoroughly enjoyed the show. The casting was on point. The star studded cast included John Goodman, Susan Surandon, Richard Roundtree and Emile Hirsh as Speed. However, my favorite character was Spritle played by Paulie Litt. He and his sidekick monkey provided great comic relief. During the exposition, the movie is a little slow but Litt keeps us open with laughs. However, during the rising action you get hooked. And their off! The racing and fight sequences are great. The colors, effects and lighting are awesome. This movie loses nothing in the transition from animated tv to big screen reality and gives you more than the kid in you bargained for.
What I Disliked: The CGI was a bit excessive. The visual was exciting and eye catching. However, I found myself a bit overwhelmed at times. I kept thinking ‘Cloverfield’ meets Dick Tracy with a side of Fast & Furious. (can you say Dramamine?) Speed Racer was a blur at times but I was able to keep up and enjoy. The opening scene could have been a little better too.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I would recommend this movie to everyone. Once it gets going it is a great show. Speed fans will love it and new comers will now join and cheer Go Speed Racer Go.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Iron Man.
What I Liked: Romantic comedies, not action movies, are my favorites. So I was pleasantly surprised to find IRON MAN a combination of both. The romantic interplay between Tony Stark (suave, devil-may-care Robert Downey, Jr.) and his able bodied assistant Pepper Potts (business minded, devoted, caring Gwyneth Paltrow) made me smile, and at times got my pulse racing. The explosive war action and double-dealing kept me guessing and on the edge of my seat. Terrence Howard and Jeff Bridges are impressive in their roles. Look for special appearances by director Jon Favreau and IRON MAN creator Stan Lee. As an IRON MAN aficionado from years past, the movie’s special effects impressed me, almost convincing me that IRON MAN could truly live.
What I Disliked: Lots of explosions and violence, although necessary to move the plot along, was disconcerting. If, like me, you have loved ones fighting for our country in the Middle East, it is shocking and heartrending to see what our military forces deal with on a day to day basis – nothing fictional about that! After over two hours in a dark theater, I want an IRON MAN to deliver us from war. Sadly, this comic book hero only offers a temporary respite from war’s harsh realities.
Would I Recommend?: Most males will relish seeing this movie at least once. Young girls will probably be less enthusiastic than their male counterparts. Women will enjoy watching Robert Downey Jr. in action, as long as he isn’t being worked over by the bad guys. Anyone who likes romantic comedies with lots of action – with the emphasis on action – will want to see this movie now, while it is playing in theaters on the big screens.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: A thrill of the senses through the machismo experience of power wealth and technology set in a real life comic book adaptation that starts out like another day in Iraq or Afghanistan were life changes in another explosion and burst of gunfire. The bravado of weapons and war was a little unsettling in the current political arena, but this is where the story line for our super hero makes its debut in this niche market of surgical strikes, laser guided weaponry and tactical weapons on a massive scale. As a child prodigy, and heir to his fathers corporate arms manufacturing empire, our soon to be hero has a change of heart (or small reactor core) that empowers him to take on the evil that weapons trading and war has wrought. This complex scenario of a story line juxtaposed to our current day conflicts of technology, gorilla warfare and extremism is very intriguing when overlaid with this fantastic array of high tech suites of polished steel—chrome—wires—switches and gadget s. An inspiring movie that illustrates how the laws of physics and science have very powerful roles to play in warfare and our human struggle sometimes with mixed consequences.
What I Disliked: Ironman can at times appear to be a recruitment poster for the military, glamorizing aspects of war through computer graphic movie effects that seem to insulate us from the true tragic effects of conflict and weapons.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, in spite of all the supercharged, flashy, movie magic, hero worshiping; this story manages to slip in some real observations on the evils of power and greed.
Score: 10 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Forgetting Sarah Marshall.
What I Liked: It was pure unadulterated hilarity! From the opening scene to the last clip which came after some of the credits, I was laughing hysterically. So hysterically in fact, I had to plant my face into my friend’s arm on numerous occasions to not disrupt the film! How often does this happen to you at a movie anymore??? This is how you know a comedy has flat out WORKED.
Jason Segal’s character was so witty, sarcastic and let’s just say a little overly secure with his body giving a stunning leading man comedic performance. Not to discredit the performances of the female leading roles of Kristen Bell and That 70’s show star, Mila Kunis, but Segal’s performance stole the show and gave the audience a fresh take on a male’s perspective of love, cheating and dealing with relationship issues. He also brought back to the art of Puppet musicals. You will have to see the film to understand this one-but it sounds funny already doesn’t it?
What I Disliked: Not very much. With that said, this is NOT a movie for the light of heart. Only open minded, somewhat childish adults will absolutely fall in love this film. This is definitely not a film you take the kid’s to on a Sunday afternoon after church lets out. This is Friday night date night with close friends when you need a little sarcasm and bad british accents to unwind after a long work week.
Would I Recommend?: Most definitely. If you are not easily offended and you love a good comedy, this is a must see. I rarely say this, but if someone asked me to see this film in the theatre again, I would say yes at the drop of a hat. With movie prices these days, that says something about this film!
Score: 9 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: Forgetting Sarah Marshall is a hilariously wacky comedy that follows Jason Segel, also the writer of the film, as Peter Bretter as he struggles to get over his break up with his rising television star girl friend Sara Marshall played by Kristen Bell. Segel’s script is filled with unique situations and gut busting humor. The dialogue is very real and intelligent and you’ll find yourself shocked to see actions or emotions portrayed as realistic as you yourself have been through. Paul Rudd is hilarious in a small role as a Surf instructor who has spent too much time in the sun, or maybe frying his brain on other things besides the sun. Kristen Bell does a good job as the upcoming star who you sometimes really hate, and other times adore. Mila Kunis is great as the compassionate woman helping Peter try to move on in his time of grief. The man who steals the movie though is Russell Brand as Sara Marshall’s new English rocker boyfriend Aldous Snow. The man is brilliantly funny. Aside from just the pains of break up and moving on, this movie has so much more going on. Friendship, sex, relationships, Hollywood, following your dreams, and even Hawaii are all topics that are throughly played upon.
What I Disliked: Because so much is tackled, it can be overwhelming. Perhaps it is too many topics to tackle. It almost seems like Segel and director Nicholas Stoller couldn’t decide what story should be the main focus. And it doesn’t seem like Peter is trying to forget Sara at all. More like how he keeps running into his ex. And although the film is very funny, most of the jokes are very crude and adult. Many of them are immature including the male nudity which gets old quickly but gets replayed unnecessarily.
Would I Recommend?: If you like relationship movies and don’t mind crude adult humor you definitly need to make your way to the theater to see this. If you are too young or are easily offended, you should definitly find something else to do opening weekend.
Score: 8 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: The guys that brought you Knocked Up and The 40 Year Old Virgin have done it again. I loved this movie! Yes, there is sophomoric humor, nudity, Dracula, and a predictable plot, but it is a fun movie and you will find yourself laughing through the whole thing.
What I Disliked: The movie did run a little longer than it needed to which resulted in a very long line in the restroom when it was over.
Would I Recommend?: If you enjoyed the Knocked Up and The 40 Year Old Virgin you will this movie as well. However, beware that there is some surprising nudity that will catch you off guard and make you laugh!
Score: 9 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Leatherheads.
What I Liked: George Clooney and Renee Zellweger star in a comedy about a 1920s football team, struggling to stay afloat financially, until its owner attracts a popular college star to play for his team. The movie is a throwback to the period it’s set in, with snappy dialogue and situational humor. Clooney and Zellweger work well in this medium and John Krasinski (Jim from TV’s “The Office") fills the role of the dashing football star with an innocence and likeable ease.
Watch for Stephen Root (Milton in Office Space) as Suds, the alcoholic sports reporter in a great supporting role.
What I Disliked: The comedy lacked for laughs at stretches in mid-plot and not all the jokes that the script shoots for strike a chord.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend it though many viewers may find this type of humor dated. A film like this, which throws back to earlier days of film, may never have been without a name like Clooney’s attached as star and producer, and probably won’t connect with all fans.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: To my relief, “Leatherheads” had a surprisingly small amount of actual football footage. The romance between George Clooney and Renee Zellweger was fun, adorable and innocent in a way that can only be gotten away with in a movie set in the 1920s. I admired Renee Zellweger’s performance as the confident feminist. I liked seeing the unruly, unglamorous side of professional football in the days before it was a national craze. The typical cheesiness of feel good sports movies felt mildly more appropriate and tolerable when set in this time period.
What I Disliked: Overall, “Leatherheads” was a very forgettable movie. There was nothing very inspiring or interesting to take away from it. At times, particularly during the scenes without Renee Zellweger, the mediocrity and lack of depth were unbearable.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend “Leatherheads” only if you’re a huge fan of vintage music, clothes, vocabulary, and culture, since you will be completely immersed in this throughout the film. Otherwise, I think viewers will struggle to find anything to care about or relate to in this movie.
Score: 4 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
What I Liked: I enjoyed this movie because I am an old movie fan. It reminded of the fast rapartee in an old Gable/Lombard film. Some of the lines were predictable, but you still found yourself laughing at them. The costumes will probably be nominated for an Academy Award—awesome!
What I Disliked: As good as the script was, I don’t think the chemistry was there between Renee Zellweger and George Clooney. I like them both as actors, but just not together.
Would I Recommend?: This was a very cute, lighthearted movie and I would recommend it over most out now. It is definitely a good date movie
Score: 6 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching 21.
What I Liked: I enjoyed “21!” Not only is it about blackjack but there’s also a lot of focus on the characters, unlike many other gambling movies that put you to sleep unless you are really into gambling. Jim Sturgess’s portrayal of a desperate student in need of money for grad school is convincing. Kevin Spacey puts on a fine performance as the crooked professor who trains the students to count cards and win at blackjack. The students eventually rebel against him and this makes for some very dramatic and funny scenes. Visually this film is pleasing with many great shots of the casinos on the Vegas strip.
What I Disliked: This isn’t the film’s fault, but I feel I need to say something about Kate Bosworth. She plays one of the students and is a good actress but her eating disorder is really showing. To say she is skeletal is an understatement. I am not poking fun and I hope she is seeking treatment. It’s really, really sad that she is practically unrecognizable when compared to her first big movie, “Blue Crush.”
Would I Recommend?: I recommend it! Cool gambling and much more!
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: It was an entertaining movie to which I could take a range of tweens and teens without groans either on my behalf or theirs. I enjoyed the fact that I didn’t have to pick out the dialogue from amongst the expletives deleted, and I didn’t have to try and associate which flying body part had erstwhile belonged to which character. Jim Sturgess makes an appealing and attractive nerd, a student at MIT, who even has an affectionately healthy relationship with his mother. It is refreshing to have the attractive blonde in the movie (Kate Bosworth as an aspiring “rocket scientist") not only appear normally proportioned but also to have more than two brain cells intermittently communicating with each other.
What I Disliked: It’s a standard caper movie. If you are looking for a challenging movie, a movie with subtle character nuances or even one with surprising plot developments, this shouldn’t be your first choice.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend this as a teen version of the “Oceans” franchise, with a similar ambience. The play of the title, 21, being both the main characters age and the relevant score needed to win at blackjack shows the level of complex interactions the movie reaches.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Marian Hill
What I Liked: As a regular player of poker, I was looking forward to “21.” Though I am more of a texas hold ‘em girl, a movie revolving around poker (mainly blackjack), and more specifically cheating successfully at it, seemed very intriguing. Unfortuantely, I liked very little about it. Actually, my favorite part of the movie was when it ended.
What I Disliked: Oh, where to begin. Kevin Spacey was predictably playing himself, which seems to be a trend with him as of late. This version of himself, was that of the professor/former card shark who woos his students to Vegas with the promise of mad money. But his one liners were so bad that you can barely remember his great characters like Verbal Kint and Lester Burnham which launched his career. He also produced the movie, which deserves another slap on the hand.
The other actors in the ensemble were all pretty forgetable and uninspiring.
The effects and cinematography were also annoyingly trite and predicitable. From the slow motion up close shot of a flipping poker chip, to the scenes of everything and everyone blurred and again in slow motion except for the main character, was rememinscent of any commerical you’d fast forward your dvr through.
Would I Recommend?: I would not recommend this movie. It reminded me of a bad WB show, that would’ve have been canceled halfway through its first season.
Score: 3 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Drillbit Taylor.
What I Liked: It was surprisingly hilarious! The trailers don’t give this movie any justice. At first glance you think this will be in the same ranks as the Sandlot Part Four. Once the beginning credits role,you see the names Judd Apatow and Seth Rogen, you know there is hope. I was probably laughing out loud for half of the film. It felt like you were watching Seth Rogen and Jonah Hill’s real 9th grade experience.
What I Disliked: The other half of the film was like crickets. Some of the editing did not work out too well. There were also times when something hilarious would occur and it would be followed up by a fairly mundane scene that didn’t add anything to the film. It had a chance to be as funny as other Apatow greats like Superbad and Knocked Up, but the lull periods in the film killed that idea. The Bully also looked like a young John Cusack rip off with an anger management problem. NOT good.
Would I Recommend?: YES. Although some of the scenes were less than exhilarating, there were a number of scenes that were were laugh out loud funny. How can one not laugh at a juvenile line like, “You know, you just can’t polish a turd!”
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: It is Superbad meets revenge of the nerds. This movie is funny and emotional. The story makes great fun of the age old tale of nerds, bullies and their battle. It was funny but there was a lot of down time for emotional moments and a side of a love story and a crush. I like how the characters connected with each other through the movie. Owen Wilson plays yet another good comedic role, though not as funny as I’ve seen him. However, it is good to see his versitility. David Dorfman,Troy Gentile and Nate Hartley were excellent as the nerdy victims. They reminded me of younger versions of the Superbad geeks fo’ sho’ LOL Alex Frost was gorgeous and terrifyingly convincing as the bully.
What I Disliked: Though very funny at times, it felt like a roller coaster with too long a leveled area in the middle. It was touching and necessary to build the story at times but it could have been done better with more comedy. I expected more laughs. Also, there was too much profanity from the mouths of babes. I would have loved to see this get a G rating with the omission of the graphic areas.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, I would recommend it. I think everyone and anyone can relate to this movie. It has all the elements of a great movie. Just be prepared for the profanity and violence.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I Liked: I bet you probably didn’t know that this was a Judd Apatow produced, Seth Rogen written film. Modern Comedy might be a new genre to you if you haven’t heard these names before. Also like myself, you might not have guessed that this was in fact, a pretty good film. Watching the last few big releases like “Knocked Up,” and “Superbad,” each film seems to be falling back in time throughout the lives of the same group of people. And now, the early high school comedy seemed to be the right bowl of punch. Though, several of the one-liners fall flat, the ratio to the ones that don’t will champion. There must also be something about Owen Wilson that makes it much easier to suspend my disbelief, even though his acting always seems less than par.
What I Disliked: Then there is the script. It is exactly what I imagined, though that shouldn’t be discouraging at all. Like their other films, much of the comedy is in reference to other films like “The Untouchables,” “Fight Club,” and even dare I say, “Dead Poet’s Society.” I would just like something fresh, though it might be too much to ask from a film like this.
Would I Recommend?: The fact that the film was so much better than I expected should be a good sign, but I’m afraid some of you might be disappointed. With a good amount of action, hilarity and vulgarity, it might be a better film to take your date to rather than your kids.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Horton Hears A Who.
What I Liked: The animation, the stars voicing the characters, and the repetition of Dr. Seuss’s theme (“A person’s a person, no matter how small.”
delighted me. Especially endearing were Katie, a blonde fur ball, and JoJo, the Mayor’s son. One added humor, while the other added mystery and intrigue. The filmmakers are to be commended for interspersing adult jokes with the innocent humor.
What I Disliked: I had such high expectations going into this movie, and even though I enjoyed most of it, it was long and meandering. A segment resembling Anime, which included Ninja kicking, seemed inappropriate. When Vlad, the vulture, threatens Horton (and Whoville), this bright, cheery story turns dark and intense. It might be too scary for younger children. Even though I was familiar with the story, I was still on the edge of my seat during this chase scene.
Would I Recommend?: If you are a fan of Horton and the Who, attending this movie is something you should do. For parents and kids, there is strong appeal: you’ll laugh; you’ll cry; you might even squeal!
Score: 6 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: This movie was enjoyable on a number of different levels. The animation/cgi was crisp, fluid and brought the illustration of the book to a 3 dimensional life. Intermixed with some unique transitions to style of Japanese manga, anima, and at one point, drawn 2 dimensional like the books, brought a punch to the depth of expression with emphasis. Undoubtedly the movie appealed to the children in the audience, but the fact that the dialog also made subtle references to our current environmental and political circumstances, I was pleased to not have to surrender to the guilt of my pleasure in reliving this aspect of my youth; in fact some of the story line, in reflection, almost seems prophetic.
What I Disliked: I really didn’t find anything I didn’t like.
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend this to Adults with children or Adults that want to relive a portion of their youths through this on-screen depiction of a book we grew up with.
Score: 10 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: This is my favorite Dr. Seuss story, so I’m a little biased. Jim Carrey does a great job as the voice of Horton, the shy but friendly elephant who discovers that the entire world of Whoville exists on a tiny speck stuck to a flower. Whoville’s goofy mayor is voiced by Steve Carell, who also does a great job. The movie’s animation is vivid and colorful by itself, but Carrey and Carell make the movie come to life with their energetic, entertaining voice performances.
What I Disliked: The pop culture and political references, while funny, seemed weak to me. The film would have been entertaining and funny enough without the throw-away pop culture references so often used in other animated movies.
Would I Recommend?: I’d definitely recommend this movie. It’s a fresh take of a much-loved classic that offers a great story, funny characters, a positive message and strong voice performances.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day.
What I Liked: Movie fans, Prepare to lose yourself in 1939 London. In Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, Frances McDormand is delightful, as she always is, as Miss Guinevere Pettigrew, a middle-aged London governess desperately searching for work. And she finds it as a “social secretary” for American actress and singer Delysia Lafosse who is desperate to be a star, played perfectly by Amy Adams. In one day Delysia takes Miss Pettigrew into the wild and selfish world of London’s upperclass. Both actresses are brilliant in their roles. McDormand as the quiet but wise Pettigrew, and Adams as the bubbly, naive 30’s actress. They make a great team. Together Pettigrew and Lafosse will face the world and teach one another about life, love, and friendship. You will be amazed at how well this period piece keeps true to pre WWII. The sets, the cloths, the music, and the lingo will astound you and will take you back to a time of innocence and entertainment. There is the ominous sights a nd feelings of the war approaching but the socialites fail to realize the upcoming danger. All but Adam’s and McDormand’s characters who portray a realistic fear that forshadows what will come.
What I Disliked: This movie is so surprising that there really isn’t anything you wont’ like, as long as you can keep up with the numerous wacky events that transpire in one day.
Would I Recommend?: I’m sure this film is not a must see on many movie fans lists, and that is a shame. It is a very enjoyable film with great performances and stunning sets. See this movie, not as a “chick flick” and not just as a date flick. See it and you’ll be surprised to see that screenwriters David Magee and Simon Beaufoy have written a wonderful story during a wonderful time. And in doing so, you will have your own day.
Score: 7 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: This was a wonderful movie that I probably would not have chosen to see based on the commercials, but I’m glad I went. It is a great date movie (my husband enjoyed it as well). This movie should be nominated for an Oscar for costumes as well as set design. I became a fan of Frances McDormand after her role in “Fargo,” and she doesn’t disappoint in this role as a slightly repressed English governess (her accent is “spot on"). I also enjoyed Amy Adams in her role as the spoiled American singer/actress. I left the theatre with a nice, “feel good” mood due to the moral that life is short, and one must follow one’s heart.
What I Disliked: There was brief nudity at the beginning that was not needed (and surprisingly male rather than the usual female).
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend this movie to anyone, but especially if you like a good British film.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
What I Liked: Miss Pettigrew was a estheticly beautiful movie. The costumes were gorgeous and the sets were fabulous. Frances McDormand was stellar as usual. But for me Lee Pace, as on of Amy Adam’s many lovers, was the best part of the movie. The star of Pushing Daisies proved to be a sexy, dymanic force on the big screen.
What I Disliked: The movie all in all was a bit boring. As a comedy, most of the jokes fell flat. As a drama, you never get attached to most of the characters and never really care what happens to them.
Would I Recommend?: The movie is pretty and would be good for a rainy day afternoon when there is nothing else to do.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Semi-Pro.
What I Liked: Will Ferrell plays a cheesy one-hit pop singer who buys, coaches and plays for a semi-pro basketball team. He’s only slightly more talented at promotion than the X’s and O’s of the hard wood, which isn’t saying much.
The movie is elevated by its surrounding performers, notably Woody Harrelson as an aging ex-NBA star and Andre Benjamin as the flashy young player looking to make it to the big leagues. A fun plot drives home the ideas of teamwork and moving toward a singular goal. Toss in a wrestling grizzly bear, and you have a steady stream of laughs.
What I Disliked: This is more of the same from Ferrell, who turns in his typical performance as a self-absorbed loser that wants to achieve something great but doesn’t know how to get there. It would be nice to see him branch out into more roles like he’s tried in “Stranger Than Fiction” and Woody Allen’s “Melinda and Melinda.”
For the movie, a romantic subplot centering on Harrelson and his lost love (Maura Tierney) is weakly developed, providing only minmal laughs.
Would I Recommend?: It’s a definite for Ferrell fans and others can find plenty to laugh about. But parents, be warned: there is an abundance of language and sexual situations that makes this inappropriate for younger kids.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: “Semi-Pro” had a couple memorable scenes that I loved. My favorite scene was a very off the wall anti gun safety shooting spree with a supposed unloaded gun which of course ended up in an accidental shooting. I’d say this is the best comedy of the year so far.
What I Disliked: Sadly, “Semi-Pro” did not live up to my very high expectations. As a huge Will Ferrell fan, I’ve been longing for one of his movies to match (or top) my favorites, “Talladega Nights,” “Old School,” and “Zoolander.” “Semi-Pro” was stupid, to be expected, but for me it lacked the outrageous, over-the-top quality that allows Will Ferrell to do his best acting. The script was way too tame for me. The cheesy, typical sports plot really stunted the movie’s ability to do new things. For all the “sexiness” in the advertising of this movie, Will Ferrell did not get sexy or unclothed at all! A lot of scenes held a lot of potential, such as the bear vs. Will Ferrell fight in the ring, but ended up being very anticlimactic. In the film’s defense, a lot of the jokes may have gone straight over my head, like the “jive turkey” scene, because it takes place in the 70s and I wasn’t even alive yet. The 70s soundtrack was also killing me, possibly causing me to tune out parts of the movie. It’s very possible that people older than me would enjoy the movie more.
Would I Recommend?: I’d recommend “Semi-Pro” to major Will Ferrell fans, but general audiences might be bored.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
What I Liked: Semi-Pro was a funny movie with a great cast.
Will Farrell plays Jackie Moon; owner, promoter, and player of the Flint, MI Tropics. As a result of a pending merger between the NBA and the ABA, the Tropics must try to stay in the game. Madness ensues as Moon resorts to outlandish promotions in order to increase the fan base in hopes of joining the NBA.
The cast also includes Woody Harrelson, Andre Benjamin, Will Arnett, and Andy Richter. At times, Will Arnett stole the show from Farrell as a hilarious drunken sports caster.
What I Disliked: Will Farrell plays the same character in all of his movies. I was a little disappointed, but not surprised, to see him play the same character yet again.
There were certain scenes in the film which attempted to be funny but were, instead, disturbing and a little obscene.
Would I Recommend?: Long time Will Farrell fans will love the movie. However, I would strongly recommend that you leave small children at home!
Score: 5 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching The Spiderwick Chronicles.
What I Liked: I liked that it wasn’t afraid to be funny, scary, and action packed all in a single PG rated film. Parents and kids alike can enjoy the vivid fantasy and creativity of this story. If you like the Narnia and Harry Potter films, you will most likely like this one too.
What I Disliked: The mom was a completely unbelievable character. She was almost an unnecessary role period, but it’s hard to have a child geared film without a parental presence somewhere in the story (unfortunately). The various creatures and the kids stole the roles in this film by far!
Also, the child’s curious imagination overriding all logic is still an excellent recipe for a Young Fantasy film.
Would I Recommend?: Most definitely. What better way to spend a Friday night then with weird goblin creatures, a creepy old century house, curious kids with a mission and a bag of popcorn? Its just plain old good movie watching!
Score: 8 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: The Spiderwick Chronicles uses some of my favorite foods in its recipe for success: honey, oatmeal, salt, and tomato sauce. Each ingredient is necessary to help the Grace family, newly transplanted New Yorkers, to surmount the problems they encounter in their relative’s country estate. These “problems” just happen to be unbelievable creatures (fairies and goblins and an ogre, oh, my!), AND - Are you ready for this? - a book! Time passes quickly during The Spiderwick Chronicles, with incredibly animated creatures interacting with extraordinarily gifted and talented human actors. In the end, I cheered for misunderstood Jared Grace, his family, and their two fairy friends as they cook up one final sweet tasting victory – literally and figuratively.
What I Disliked: The only way the adventure can unfold is if rebellious, misunderstood Jared Grace ignores the dire warning note on a book, and reads it. How can reading any book be dangerous?? Subsequently, Jared is forced to use his newly acquired knowledge to vanquish an unseen foe. The creatures threatening him and his family are frightening, and sometimes nauseatingly real. They are also mesmerizing to behold.
Would I Recommend?: This is a movie for anyone wanting to cheer for a single mom and her kids, who must unite as one loving family to surmount seen and unseen problems – with the aid of a well-written book. You’ll also enjoy the action immensely if you believe (or want to believe) in a world of mythical creatures, benign as well as offensive, and impossible but satisfying endings.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
What I Liked: This film wastes no time getting us into the story and doesn’t let down throughout unlike some other children’s fantasy films. You will love the CG characters and voice acting by Martin Short, Seth Rogen and even Nick Nolte. For some odd reason, the film made me feel like I was watching Jumanji, and that’s a good thing.
What I Disliked: As much as I liked the action, the pacing and the CG elements, it still didn’t break many molds, as a film. As a story, I found it just as exciting as The Dark Is Rising which is based off of an excellent series of books, though the 2007 film totally missed the mark. I also kind of wish that Paramount would make this into a trilogy because I do believe they could’ve elaborated on many things no matter how cliche that decision might be.
Would I Recommend?: If you’re a twenty-something feeling lonely on a Friday night, then by all means, go enjoy this film. If not, I’d wait until it runs on HBO and just leave it to parents wanting take their kids for a nice weekend out to watch it in theaters. Another strange observation, the last fight between the lead character and the Nick Nolte monster resembled more than anything the Megatron chase on the rooftops in Transformers.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Fool’s Gold.
What I Liked: A movie of lush tropical vistas, voluptuous lead actresses and the stereotypical treasure hunt that is sprinkled with a lot of sexual innuendos, irony and humorous dialog that is entertaining, as long as you don’t over analyze the premise of the antagonist.
What I Disliked: The quirky unbelievable characters of the villain and his henchmen, whom appear to be more like caricatures with a parody on some sort of rapper mogul.
Would I Recommend?: If you are just looking for a good time with your date; this is a good movie for laughs, romance and adventure.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I Liked: Although I thought this was going to be a “chick flick,” it turned out to be a thoroughly enjoyable romantic comedy which my husband also enjoyed. The chemistry between McConaughey and Hudson is fantastic, as in their last movie together, and I enjoyed Alexis Dziena in her role.
What I Disliked: My only caution about this movie is there is some brief nudity so be careful with your teenagers.
Would I Recommend?: I would highly recommend this movie for a lighthearted evening out.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
What I Liked: I wanted to like this movie. The lush, gorgeous shots of the ocean (filmed in Australia) were breathtaking to see on the big screen. I like Matthew McConaughey, Kate Hudson and the chemistry they have together. Donald Sutherland is usually amazing, no matter what the role. Did I mention how beautiful the Australian beach scenes were?
What I Disliked: This movie tries to be all things to all people, but ends up being not much to anyone. Kate Hudson’s character Tess, a steward on a millionaire’s yacht, is finally divorcing her irresponsible husband of eight years, surfer dude and treasure hunter Finnigan (Matthew McConaughey), who has just discovered the 18th century Spanish “Queen’s booty” they’ve searched for all these years. On the run from his financier’s thugs, however, Finnigan can’t recover the treasure without Tess’s help and her millionaire boss’s financial support. “Fool’s Gold” starts out as a romantic comedy, turns into an action/adventure thriller, and finishes as an over-the-top, predictable jumble of genres and storylines. The only consistencies were the weak characters and the regular whacks to the head that Finnigan received throughout the movie.
Would I Recommend?: Only if you’re overwhelmed, overworked and in desperate need of vegging out with a big bucket of popcorn in front of a brightly colored, flimsy flick for a couple of hours. Otherwise, save your money.
Score: 2 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Over Her Dead Body.
What I Liked: Eva Longoria Parker plays an over protective ghost that begins haunting the psychic woman that her former fiance, played by Paul Rudd, begins to date. Eva does well playing a spiteful spirit that hasn’t moved on yet. Although the role is not anything new since I’m sure she has mastered the selfish spoiled role from her television show “Desperate Housewives”. As in most of his roles Paul Rudd is once again great as a sarcastic nice guy; but this time he shows a lot of feeling as the mourning widower. The surprise in this film is Lake Bell, who plays the psychic haunted by Eva’s ghost. She pulls off the quick humor, and the physical humor very well. The dialogue is smart, and the gags are humerous but not gut busting.
What I Disliked: Something just feels like it is missing in this film and I just can’t seem to put my finger on it. Perhaps it is the fact that we get to know hardly anything about the relationship between Rudd and Longoria Parker’s character except they loved one another. But was Eva’s character always a snobby woman or did she have any sweetness at all to her? Was she always so demanding, or was is it just because she loves her fiance so much? Because none of these questions are answered, you really don’t like Eva’s character and don’t really feel sorry for her. Or maybe what’s missing is Jason Biggs importance in the film. Sure he plays Lake Bell’s partner, but he just seems out of place. There doesn’t seem like he even needs to be in the film.
Would I Recommend?: While “Over Her Dead Body” is a cute movie, it isn’t anything really special. In truth you’ll probably forget about the film with in a few hours. But it is a film worth seeing if you’re with that special someone and you have nothing to do. Maybe you should see this as a Matinee, so you’ll still have other things to do together after the film.
Score: 4 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: I haven’t laughed that hard at a movie in years. I’ve never really watched Eva Longoria act and to be honest I feared she would be terrible in this role. I was truly surprised to find she is quite comical. Paul Rudd and Lake Bell had great on screen chemistry and brought their characters to life. The ending was predictable but I had such a good time seeing how the storyline moved towards the end that I was okay with knowing what was going to happen.
What I Disliked: The only thing I didn’t like about the movie was that towards the end the plot tried to go a really weird route. Sorry this is a spoiler-one character who confesses to pretending to be gay was just a scenario that the film could have done without.
Would I Recommend?: I would absolutely recommend this movie. It’s not just a chick flick. It had humor for both sexes. It’s laugh out loud and burst into applause funny!
Score: 8 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
What I Liked: The animals stole the show, especially the parrot. They seemed to be more committed to their roles than the actors. Paul Rudd, as the mourning fiancé, and Jason Biggs, as the assistant, are pleasant and appealing, and so are the women. But even though they are visually attractive, they lack substance and unique characteristics. It’s too much fluff, and not enough heart.
What I Disliked: The broad, slapstick humor can be uncomfortable to watch at times. Even though the audience’s laughter drowned out dialogue during the movie’s humorous anecdotes and one liners, the humor was minimal, failing to adequately sustain the film for 95 minutes.
Would I Recommend?: If you are looking for mindless entertainment, with some humorous moments, you’ll like it. This is a movie for single women who want a “girls night out.” Leave the men at home. It’s well intentioned, and we all know where the road to good intentions will lead.
Score: 3 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching U2 3D.
What I Liked: Shot during the “Vertigo” tour while in Argentina, this concert film highlights the grandness of U2’s latest tour in glowing fashion.
The 3D effects are best put to use in sweeping shots of the band and inserts featuring action at two different positions in the arena.
While mostly shot straight-forward, the film ends with an song interestingly enhanced by graphics (which also appeared on the large screen behind the band.)
The sound quality mostly keeps with the spirit of a concert experience, with appropriate levels of crowd noise.
U2’s talent and showmanship are undeniable. This movie just showcases that.
What I Disliked: Rock ‘n roll videos rely heavily on quick and flashy cuts; 3D movies don’t thrive on that. At certain points, not enough time is left to enjoy the 3D effect of a shot before we have moved on from it.
Blurring can also be a problem with the high energy motion of the concert.
Cheesy 3D set-ups are kept to a minimum, mostly instigated by Bono when the camera gets too close.
Would I Recommend?: For U2 fans, this film is a must. Also, if you want to see the band without all the pushing and beer-spilling, go see this movie. It’s also a prime example of how 3D film can be used in an innovative way. In any case, it’s well worth the experience.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: I thoroughly enjoyed U2 3D! This was my first 3D concert and it was indescribable! I felt as if I was literally on stage with the band! I could actually feel the energy of the audience! I definitely prefer this over physically being at a concert live! It was so nice to hear the music without all the distortion and crowd noise. It was great seeing the show from different angles, swooping in and out of the crowd and all around each band member. There are plenty of close ups that bring you much closer than any live performance could ever get you. The 3D overhead shots were stunning and would obviously be impossible to recreate in person. The visuals and sound quality were just amazing. What I loved most about U2 3D is that it’s full of fast paced, nonstop music without any boring behind-the-scenes footage or band interviews. I really hope more bands do this type of concert recording because I love it!
What I Disliked: At one point Bono flaps his arms gracefully as if he’s a bird in slow motion. Very un-cool. U2 3D loses a point for that. Bono randomly explores homoeroticism with the bassist, Adam Clayton, including a caress of the face and a kiss on the lips. It’s possible this happens at all their concerts and I’m completely ignorant, but it just sort of startled me and seemed out of place in the middle of trying to rock out. There was also no love for the guitarist, The Edge! I’m all for being open but I was unprepared for the dramatic display of love. After all, with the 3D I felt like I was right there having a threesome with them, which quite frankly is gross. Another point lost. Bono watered down some of the vocals at times, which I suppose is to be expected in any concert in general so he won’t lose a point for that. Finally, I got tired of U2’s message about religious and political coexistence. I do admire the message but sometimes I just want to rock out for the sake of the music, not for an agenda. When they used the song “One” as an analogy for the similarities between Argentina and Ireland I was a little offended by the stretch of the imagination there. Please let the song be what the lyrics are actually about, or let the song be what I want it to be about, but please don’t disgrace the song by having it mean eight thousand different things depending upon which political message you’re trying to get across that night. Another point lost for messing up “One.”
Would I Recommend?: Yes, this is a must see for all U2 fans!
Score: 7 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
What I Liked: U2 3D is really like being at a concert. But not just in the audience. The cameras bring you on stage, up above, behind the drums, and much more. The results of the technology of this movie are really magical and hard to explain unless witnessed. It brings a major concert to life. But with better seats than you could ever normally afford.
What I Disliked: U2 3D is strictly a concert movie. Not a “Rattle and Hum” or “Truth or Dare” where they show backstage goings-ons. Just U2 on stage for 85 minutes. After a few songs, the magic of the 3D-ness wears off and it feels like you are just at a U2 concert. Which is great if you are a U2 fan, but if you are not it can get boring.
Would I Recommend?: For U2 and rock lovers alike, this is definitely an amazing experience. But if you could care less about Bono’s drone or The Edge’s guitar playing, you’d probably be better off passing.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching 27 Dresses.
What I Liked: Katherine Heigl and James Marsden have good chemistry in this romantic comedy about a girl who has been a bridesmaid 27 times. Heigl, who recently starred in the hit film “Knocked Up,” fits her role well as Jane, the perpetual bridesmaid. She has many funny moments showing her frustration with always being the bridesmaid and never finding Mr. Right. Marsden plays Kevin, a newspaper writer who regularly covers local weddings and can’t seem to decide if writing the big story and furthering his career is more important than pursuing Jane. Judy Greer provides a lot of laughs and is great playing the promiscuous best friend of Jane.
What I Disliked: Marsden’s character lacks drive. He does a decent job in this role but he could have been great. His character seems too relaxed. He doesn’t have enough drive about his career or his personal life. He never shows enough energy or excitement, especially about the potential romance with Jane. Malin Akerman, who plays Jane’s self-obsessed younger sister, is boring, annoying, and never should never have been cast in this movie.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, it’s pretty good for a girly date movie.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: Don’t let the title or trailers fool you. This isn’t your run of the mill chick flick. This movie was very entertaining for everyone. Even the manliest will laugh and may learn something too. I got more than I bargained for with this movie. It was laugh-out-loud funny and touching at the same time. The cast was well planned and the story very well portrayed. The soundtrack was great too. I was singing and dancing in my seat when I was laughing my head off. I related well with the main character. I was especially glad to see that although nice guys (or gals) may finish last, they can finish happily ever after. And I won’t even mention the dresses, you’ll have to see them for yourself. LOL My only regret is that I didn’t invite my date thinking he wouldn’t like it. Oh well, he’ll catch it at home on DVD. I will definitely buy it.
What I Disliked: What’s not to like? You’d have to be heartless not to find something hilarious and touching about this movie. I do think that the male love interest’s story could have been built up a bit more. I thought they’d show us how he came to be like the main character in the beginning. That could have been fun. Oh yeah and what’s with all the soap opera rejects in the cast? For you ABC network soap fans out there, I found all the latest missing actors. They left to do this movie. LOL
Would I Recommend?: I recommend this flick for all audiences. You can’t go wrong with this movie. It is good for the whole family or as a date movie. I even enjoyed it alone. Don’t miss this one.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I Liked: This is a smart, funny movie. It’s well-paced, without the interminable slow patches that beset some comedies. Judy Greer is excellent in her “best friend” role, adding a very welcome ascerbic element to the proceedings with her sharp dialogue. She helps ensure that the movie stays light but not completely frothy.
What I Disliked: I enjoy romantic comedies. However, I can see that the relatively standard formula of this “chick flick”, with some of its more contrived plot twists might make it less appealing to some moviegoers.
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend it highly. It’s both well-written and well- cast. Katherine Heigl and James Marsden make an appealing couple with believable chemistry, while the secondary roles are also strong. This plot will resonate with every woman who has ever been a bridesmaid and, hence, by definition has some monstrosity of a dress hanging at the back of her closet.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Bucket List.
What I Liked: The two best things about this humorous and moving film are easy to name: Morgan Freeman (Carter) and Jack Nicholson (Edward). The interaction between these two veteran actors makes you wonder why someone hasn’t put them together before this.
The script by Justin Zackman offers a well-paced plot and plenty of laughs, all the while bringing home an important point about life. Rob Reiner provides his usual solid direction, allowing his talented actors to work their magic.
Outside of the main characters, Sean Hayes as Edward’s assistant shows a subtler side to his acting than that in his “Will & Grace” days.
What I Disliked: This is the type of movie that relies heavily on what an viewer brings with them. I found myself quiet and moved during times that many in the audience laughed out loud. Possibly (because of the advertising associated with the movie), some audience members think this film was supposed to be a straight comedy, but it is much more. This at times may be a bit confusing for some.
Would I Recommend?: I’d definitely recommend this movie. The acting, humor and message are all there to make a wonderful film.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Don Smith
What I Liked: The various global landscapes ranging from the coast of France to the Great Wall of China to the famous breath-taking Pyramids of Cairo. Seeing all this beauty makes you forget, for a moment, how depressing it is to see two of the greatest actors of all time dying before your eyes.
What I Disliked: It seemed contrived. Let’s put two amazing aged actors together to make a blockbuster about a scenario that is highly unlikely. I think Nicholson and Freeman have some steam left to make a couple more films before they ‘kick the bucket’.
Would I Recommend?: Not to any of my friends. A certain group of people would appreciate this film for its last minute thrill rides and cheap laughs before death. Others will be sprinting to a comedy to make them feel invincible once again.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: A sentimental journey with two men of terminal proportions that take on the frailty and impermanence of life, while playing off each others strengths and weaknesses; that tugs at your heart. They seek to satisfy the essence of life’s journey and the inherent meaning therein. Both actors seem to draw on portions of their previous picture roles, such as Nicholson in ‘A Few Good Men’ and Freedman channels a God like quality when describing the spiritual in life.
What I Disliked: Some of the sequences seem to be underdeveloped or just extremely edited, and could use more transitions as they come across like snapshots in a photo album. The humor depends a lot on one liner’s, although there are a few that follow the storyline for buildup. Also some of the sets appear to be done in a studio with backdrops, instead of true location, which loses the life quest quality.
Would I Recommend?: In general family-social-dynamics, this would be a good option, but not a must see.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
Advertisement
