|
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Terminator Salvation.”
What I liked: It remains pretty loyal to the other Terminator movies right down to the squeeze in of the Guns N’ Roses “You Could Be Mine” song.(Which for me seemed like a cheap throw in last minute)They brought back the famous picture of Sarah Connor and even a quick scene with Arnold in the flesh looking more youthful then in the previous Terminator film. Plus, you usually can’t go wrong with Christian Bale as a lead. He is famous for taking his roles to the brink and he doesn’t fail to do his best to bring out the role of John Connor, leader of the resistance.
What I disliked: Even with Christian Bale, there is something lacking. Fresh off the heels of other summer blockbusters like Wolverine and Star Trek, this one just doesn’t hit the mark. There are several over the top moments with the “half machine, half man” enigma Marcus Wright that seem just down right corny and over done. Sometimes when you try to stay loyal too much, it actually makes it a little boring. It needed a fresh look, and it didn’t get one.
Would I recommend it? Yes and No. There are people that just love action films and with the amounts of explosions, machines flying around and heavy sound effects, many people will love it. When you take a step back, though, was the movie really that amazing as it was hyped up to be? Definitely not-even with Batman at the wheel.
Score: 6 out of 10
Michelle Schenck
What I liked: The war with the machines is here. Terminator Salvation is pumped full of action. Several scenes in the film put you right in the middle of the battle, giving you a sense that this really is war for survival. Christian Bale does a good job playing the seasoned veteran who has seen and been fighting the human killing machines his whole life. Sam Worthington is excellent as Marcus Wright, a half man half machine tough not knowing who he is or how he got to be in the position he is in. It is very enjoyable and believable to see small pockets of resistance around the country listening to John Conner’s radio speeches. It really does give you the feeling that humanity is at it’s end. And for true Terminator fans, there are several shout outs to the previous movies done with class and respect. Just keep your eyes and your ears open. Especially for special guest appearances.
What I disliked: Fans of the original Terminator film should remember the dark imagery of Kyle Reece’s memories of the future. Terminator Salvation takes place almost all in the daytime and so it looses something of the horror of the machines ruling the world and killing humans at night. It just doesn’t have the same feeling of dread. Another problem I found in the film is the story is all over the place. It’s like watching three different stories which try to come together at the end, but not as successfully as you hope. And although Sam Worthington’s is great as another tough guy in the film, he really doesn’t feel like there is a real need for him. He feels just like a reason to return to the half man half robot tough guy we have gotten use to. Lastly, there seems to be a lot of items borrowed from other big blockbuster movies. Certain machines remind you too much of Transformers. Certain story points remind you too much of The Matrix Reloaded. You’ve seen all this before.
Would I recommend it? The War with the Machines is a definite must see. The action is intense and it’s another great chapter of the Terminator series. It won’t be the awesome flick that will keep you rocking for weeks after, but it definitly will get your blood pumping for some time.
Score: 7 out of 10
John T. McMillin
What I liked: John Connor is back and he is on a mission to save humanity from the machines. While maintaining aspects of the original story line, Salvation is darker than the previous Terminator movies. I, for one, enjoyed the dreary, post apocalyptic nature of the film. Visually, this movie was amazing! The detail given to the machines and the special effects is incredible. Christian Bale’s performance is militant and severe and his portrayal of Conner is probably the only realistic element of the film. Sam Worthington does an amazing job in this film and his presence on the screen far surpasses Bale’s to the disappointment of “Baleheads” everywhere.
What I disliked: The fact that the movie was nonstop action definitely takes away from the human element of the film but what is lost in plot and dialogue is made up for in explosions and gunfire.
Would I recommend it? Do not expect the plot of the century but as far as summer blockbusters go, this movie is at the top of my list! Definitely go see this movie.
Score: 8 out of 10
Jessica A. Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Observe and Report.”
What I liked: “Observe and Report” is a guilty pleasure for me. Seth Rogen and his bizarre mall security staff are hilarious and crude. All the characters in the mall are entertaining and Ray Liotta is great at his part as an intense cop who is always on Seth’s case. The always funny Anna Faris plays a snobby and trashy make up counter girl who Seth likes. He tries to protect her and everyone else from a flasher who has been terrorizing the mall. The scenes involving the flasher are a riot and there is also a hysterical scene involving Seth and a kiosk employee named Saddamn. Seth’s drunken mother, played by Celia Weston, is great. The movie is very funny but it’s also very raunchy with tons of nudity and bad language.
What I disliked: Nothing, everything is great.
Would I recommend it? Yes. It’s a great comedy but keep in mind it’s a strong R rating.
Score: 8 out of 10
Nick Conrad
What I liked: Observe and Report is a dark comedy starring Seth Rogan, Ray Liotta and Anna Faris of Scary Movie fame. Seth plays a troubled mall security cop hell bent on catching a thief and a flasher terrorizing the mall. He hopes to win the heart of a girl, played by Faris, who has no interest in him what-so-ever. Furthermore he has dreams of grandeur at being a police officer for the darnedest reasons. Despite the violence, vulgarity and extreme nudity throughout, this movie was actually hilarious at times. When I wasn’t being shocked by the blasphemy or the bloodshed not expected in this comedy, I was laughing out loud.
What I disliked: I didn’t appreciate all the swearing but it sometimes added to the humor. I really didn’t like Seth for his role in this either. I would have liked to see it played differently. For a comedy, there was too much violence and bloodshed however it also added to the laughs at times.
Would I recommend it? I recommend this movie for anyone who enjoyed Superbad and Pineapple Express. If the dark and dry humor is your thing, this movie is for you. I definitely don’t advise taking the children or the elders. All I can say is proceed with caution. LOL
Score: 7 out of 10
Tanisha Speight
What I liked: Observe and Report is ridiculously funny. Written and directed by Jody Hill, whose debut movie “The Fist Foot Way” was even funnier. Hill is proving to be a comedy force, catching up quickly to Judd Apatow. Seth Rogen is lucky we are not quite sick of him yet, for he plays pretty much the same character as he has the last couple of years. This time just replacing sensitivity with sociopathy. All of the supporting cast is great including Anna Faris as a collagened-out beauty counter girl, Michael Pena as a security guard with a drug problem and lisp both worse than Mike Tyson’s, Patton Oswalt as the food court manager with no heart and Danny McBride, the fastest rising star from the south, as a crack dealer trying to get his son into the family business.
What I disliked: Observe and Report at times went to the old stand by gross out scenes for a laugh. It also was extremely and surprisingly violent at times, which seemed completely unnecessary. Ray Liotta also bored me as the “real” detective with no heart.
Would I recommend it? Observe and Report is definitely worth checking out. There are some great up and coming comedy talents that will soon go from “that one guy” to household names, (especially Danny McBride). If you do go see this movie, leave your political correctness and your kids at home.
Score: 7 out of 10
Stephanie Powers
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Fast & Furious.”
What I liked: From the very first scenes this movie was very intense. Full of fast cars, hard bodied men, and beautiful women, this movie has something for everyone. Paul Walker and Vin Diesel reprise their original roles as Brian O’Conner and Dom Toretto, two men with a complicate friendship who are once again thrust together in a high speed adventure.
What I disliked: Some of the action sequences and plot points were predictable. However, this did not take away from the overall excitement of the film. If you’re a fan of the previous Fast and Furious movies, you will love this one as well.
Would I recommend it? I think this is the best installment of the Fast and Furious franchise yet!
Score: 5 out of 10
Jessica Locke
What I liked: The original cast is reunited in a new action packed adventure that doesn’t seem all that original. Vin Diesel is back in the role he was born to play as Dominic Toretto, still wanted by the law, and still using fast cars and dangerous stunts to make money in dangerous fashions. Diesel slides back in comfortably as a leader and tough guy who has no fear and is tough as nails. You enjoy watching him on screen, even if you don’t really get explanations for the things he does. The action is intensely nonstop and will have you cheering at every crash and explosion. The one liners fly like bullets and will grab your laughs effectively.
What I disliked: Unfortunately all this movie has is fast cars and action. The story line is rehashed from so many other movies, including one of the sequels of this very franchise. Nothing seems original. In an attempt to get as much action into the film as possible the pacing is very rushed leaving out most chances of characterization or heart. Paul Walker is very blase in his returning role. It’s the same old is he good guy or a bad guy role we’ve seen at least two other times. And the villains are limited to scowls and smiles and are not intimidating or exciting at all.
Would I recommend it? The Fast and the Furious delivers exactly what you thought it would. Bumping music, sleek cars, and mindless action. If you just want to sit and be entertained by violence and action, then this is the movie for you. If you want to watch a film with characters you care about and a storyline that is well executed, then check the next film listing.
Score: 6 out of 10
John T. McMillin
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Defiance.”
What I liked: Defiance is a Holocaust movie like no other. When their family and friends start being massacred by the Nazis, three brothers take refuge in the forest. Fighting to stay alive, the brothers steal food and firearms from local farmers and build a camp. They are quickly joined by fellow Jews seeking safety. The number of those hiding in the forest grows from 3 to 1,200. This amazing tale of survival shows the everyday life of their forest community and how they all work together to create a new life in exile.
What I disliked: The movie was slow at times but these parts served to elaborate on their living situation and show the audience how they organized their community in order to survive.
Would I recommend it? I would definitely recommend this movie. There have been a lot of Holocaust movies made but this one stands out and tells a different tale of survival and vengeance.
Score: 8 out of 10
Jessica Locke
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “The Tale of Despereaux.”
What I liked: “The Tale of Despereaux” sends a good message that you can’t always judge people or animal creatures by their cover. Despereaux (Matthew Broderick) and Roscuro (Dustin Hoffman) play likable rodent characters and kids will hopefully enjoy their many adventures.
What I disliked: This film is pretty boring and moves slowly. There is little humor and needless to say there are no appealing jokes for parents. Bolt and Madagascar 2 are much more entertaining choices. The large cast of name actors is a complete waste. The animation is dull and ugly - especially the human characters, who practically look like the Coneheads from SNL. One section of the story is unrealistic, I won’t spoil it but let’s just say one of the characters does an unforgivable act and it’s swept under the rug like it’s nothing.
Would I recommend it? No. Go see one of the more enjoyable children’s movies currently playing.
Score: 3 out of 10
Nick Conrad
What I liked: I liked Despereaux, the little mouse. Unfortunately that was about the only thing I enjoyed about the movie.
What I disliked: This movie really fell short for me. I went in expecting an adorable film that would make me laugh and teach a good lesson. Although it did teach the lesson of doing what’s right is not always popular it was difficult to keep my attention focused. This movie was about an hour longer than it needed to be and even as an adult it was difficult not to get anxious for the predictable ending. It was no surprise to me that a handful of people were leaving the theater way before it was over.
Would I recommend it? I would not recommend this movie to anyone. In fact I’ve caught myself telling people to bypass it even when it comes out on DVD and rent Wall-E, Madagascar, or some other cartoon instead. It’s a shame because this flick had so much potential. The trailers led me to believe it would be so much better. I wonder what exactly went wrong in the planning?
Score: 3 out of 10
Ashley Grant
What I liked: This was enjoyable on many levels.
First, I noticed there were a number of well known actors doing the character voices and that the animations were nicely rendered, with fluid movement in a variety of techniques.
Also the plot had many facets, that managed to develop a unique storyline—thread throughout this charming landscape of fascinating personalities and species, that illuminated a heartwarming story.
What I disliked: Was a little uncomfortable with the social distinctions that separated the mice from the rats, but this was reconciled to a degree.
Would I recommend it? Yes, I feel it is quite entertaining for both children and adults of all ages, I heard laughter from both.
Score: 10 out of 10
Michael Ritenour
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Yes Man.”
What I liked: Jim Carrey is better than ever! Not only is this is the funniest movie I have seen in years, but it honestly makes me forgive him for doing that wretched flick The Number 23. I was beginning to fear that laugh out loud comedians didn’t write movies anymore. Luckily Yes Man has emerged just in time for the stress-filled time that is the holiday season.
What I disliked: Honestly, I can’t think of a single thing I didn’t like about this film. I don’t like the fact that all too often people do say no out of fear. We should be more open to new opportunities. That sad thought aside, this movie was so funny I could not stop laughing during the entire thing. I wish it had been longer so I could have kept the good times rolling.
Would I recommend it? This movie should be seen by everyone who needs a laugh. If you sit through this entire film and don’t laugh you clearly just don’t get it!
Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Twilight”
What I liked: Set against sweeping Washington state vistas, empathetic high school students and starkly white vampires breathe life into Stephanie Meyer’s 498-page novel, “Twilight,” in just over two hours. As this generation’s James Dean, Robert Pattinson is almost perfect as the brooding, passionate, complex Edward Cullen. Taylor Lautner is ideal as shy, quiet, captivating Jacob Black, and Billy Burke plays the consummate father – oblivious to what is really happening in his daughter’s life, while caring and worrying about her typical teenage behavior. The best action sequence is a ball game in the woods during a lightning storm – smooth, rhythmic, and fascinating.
What I disliked: The rest of the movie’s action clumsily charges along, thrusting important details into quick, rigid events, sometimes with overdramatic music and jerky transitions. Lush vampire abilities that flow magnificently in print are irregular and cartoonish on film. The undead look the part – white skin, golden to black eyes, and ruby lips – but the make-up is startling and pasty, instead of impressive. Kristen Stewart is a stronger, more independent Bella - not the lovely and needy “damsel in distress” portrayed in the novel.
Would I recommend it? Anyone who has read “Twilight” will be swept up in the breathtaking visuals and dead-on characterizations. However, the action and story might be disorienting and unsatisfying for the uninitiated. A caveat for the chick flick cynics: this is definitely a love story with more bite literally than figuratively.
Score: 8 out of 10
Courtenay O’Connell
What I liked: “Twilight” is one of the best vampire movies I’ve ever seen! I liked the themes of self restraint, protection and trust that run through the plot. I found the relationship between Bella and Edward surprisingly romantic and sincere. I was very impressed by the maturity of the main characters and the issues they face as a couple. “Twilight” is the best movie I’ve seen in a long time with a target audience of young teenagers. I was worried the world was going to be overrun by “High School Musical” garbage which portrays teenagers as extremely childish and their puppy love as laughable nonsense. In contrast, the emotionally rich characters in “Twilight” capture that amazing turning point in life, that indescribable shift from child to adult, where the idealism and optimism of youth meet the ability to make those first choices that shape the life you choose for yourself. Kristen Stewart, who plays Bella, has grown so much as an actor and she contributes a lot to the success of this movie. “Twilight” also has an excellent soundtrack that added a lot to the dreamy overtones of the movie. By the end of the film I felt invested in the story and not having read the books I find myself wondering what the future holds for Bella and Edward.
What I disliked: It takes a long time for the movie to get going. The first interactions between Bella and Edward were awkward and choppy. Their time together was rushed and felt like an inadequate basis for their intense attraction and perfection together. The special effects throughout the entire movie were absolutely, inexcusably bad.
Would I recommend it? Yes I’d definitely recommend it. There are some terrific role models in this movie for young viewers.
Score: 7 out of 10
Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa”
What I liked: It is better the second time around! I wouldn’t call it an escape; it was more of a journey to the other side. LOL. The lovable New York zoo animals, Alex (Ben Stiller), Gloria (Jada Pinkett Smith), Marty (Chris Rock) and Melman (David Schwimmer) attempt to return home to the zoo. Those clever and comical penguins concoct an aircraft from a wreck. They attempt to fly it back to NY but don’t make it out of Africa. Instead they wind up crash landing smack in the middle of Alex’s hometown. Here we meet Zuba, Alex’s dad (voiced by the late great Bernie Mac) and Florrie, Alex’s mom (the View’s Sherri Shepherd). We learn of the animals’ roots, heritage and many ethical and life lessons. “Madagascar’s” sequel is educational and very funny. When I was not laughing out loud, I would ‘move it, move it’ in my seat to the great music. This movie was well worth the three and a half year wait.
What I disliked: What’s not to like? Maybe there could have been more to the penguins story. They were the best characters for humor along with the old lady tourist. The movie could have been a bit longer as well. I hated to see it end. I can’t wait until the third installment. Alright DreamWorks, move it, move it! LOL.
Would I recommend it? I’d recommend this movie to anyone. It is suitable for the entire family. You should see it as a family. Dads and brothers will enjoy it as well as the ladies.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Tanisha Speight
What I liked: The original voice cast of the first “Madagascar” film are back. In the sequel the animals try to make it back to New York and their home in the New York Zoo but instead crash land in Africa. Although Ben Stiller, Chris Rock, David Schwimmer, and Jada Pinkett Smith do a great job of showing emotion in their respectable animals, it is Sacha Baron Cohen as Julian, the king Lemur, and everyone’s favorite military minded Penguins that get the laughs and steal the show. Unfortunately the laughs are rare and the plot of the film is hard to find.
What I disliked: There is no full plot that moves this film. The film seems to be a series of shorts spliced together featuring the animal stars in various personal adventures. Many of the subplots have a lot of holes that are not explained like why Julian the King Lemur is coming along on this adventure. It’s just another reason to add some more semi-funny jokes. And if jokes don’t work the writers are quick to resort to slapstick comedy to fill in the dead spaces. The older lady who smacked Alec the lion around in the first film gets more screen time and you wonder why, because her scenes are not that funny and they seem to drag on and on, with more slapstick added in for supposed fun. And if the slapstick comedy doesn’t work the writers think that hiring several famous actors to do voice work will help boost the enjoyment of the film. Actors Alec Baldwin and Bernie Mac aren’t really given much to work with, and seem like they are simply in the film for name dropping.
Would I recommend it? This film is far from being an animation classic, but kids may love it if they loved the first one. And with the choices at the theaters slim for families, this film is definitly recommended for families if you really want to take the kids to a film. Otherwise, skip this film and just wait for it to come to video, where it should have been released anyway.
Score: 3 out of 10
John T. McMillin
What I liked: Whether we like to admit it or not, we all have insecurities and struggles we have to deal with. I like that this film explores diversity and the setbacks that can occur in life even though they do it with talking animals. This film is great at teaching the lesson that we are all unique. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses and if we work together towards common goals we can use those strengths and weaknesses to solve each others’ problems.
What I disliked: I honestly didn’t like how short the movie was. I was enjoying it so much I wanted it to keep going. The other thing I didn’t like was how fast the story line moves along. Problems can’t always be solved that fast. Yes, I know that it has to be a short movie to keep the attention of the audience it is intended for, but it does make me nervous to teach the lesson that everything has a fast answer and that all problems can be fixed quickly and easily.
Would I recommend it? I would recommend it to parents because it is funny and has a good message. This movie is the perfect family-friendly flick to watch and enjoy together.
Score: 7 out of 10
Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Changeling”
What I liked: No, Eastwood hasn’t lost it yet like many thought he would after the successes of MYSTIC RIVER, MILLION DOLLAR BABY, and LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA. But in keeping, he has returned and brought us one of the best films of the year. Although Eastwood may not seem to shine techniaclly, it is really the subtleties that make CHANGELING what it is.
And of course we are not forgetting the leading lady, A. Jolie, who many tend to forget is an actress first, and then a celebrity. If A MIGHTY HEART didn’t assure you that she’s worthy of the screen, then this definitely will. I have not seen Jolie as emotionally invested in a character as she is as Christine Collins here. There are some great supporting performances by Jeffrey Donovan as Police Capt. Jones in charge of the investigation as well as another remarkable performance by Amy Ryan whose breakout role in GONE BABY GONE last year impressed us all.
What I disliked: Honestly, CHANGELING is brilliantly smooth around the edges and whereas the 140 minute run-time may seem like too much, Eastwood leaves us with little time for detachment.
Would I recommend it?: The Oscar Race is well underway and I’ll be surprised if Jolie doesn’t receive a nomination. Eastwood weaves this non-fictional tale through several genres, least of all drama and suspense, but above all else, horror. Parts of this horrifyingly true tale can be some what compared to aspects of ZODIAC, SNOW ANGELS, GONE BABY GONE and even LA CONFIDENTIAL. CHANGELING is not only a great film but a truly extraordinary story of determination and hope. Get out and watch, now.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Nizar Babul
What I liked: Eastwood tackles a story that many people might not know about unless they are a history major. In 1928, the Wineville chicken coop murders were the hot press. The underlying story about a mother trying to find her son and the obstacles she goes through with the corrupt LAPD has made history. The acting of Angelina Jolie and John Malkovich in particular are potentially Oscar worthy. You will walk out of this film not only shaken but stirred-even taking a moment to realize you are in 2008, not 1928.
What I disliked: Although Angie’s acting was great, it wasn’t brilliant. This time it wasn’t the actors fault. She was not given the best material to work with making her character seem confused at times and at a loss of words when there should have been some speech.
Although this film brings forth a new story to the big screen, the content feels predictable and you continue watching the film thinking you know it will end one of three different ways.
Would I recommend it?: Yes. The acting, scenery and the treatment of women in the 1920’s is reason enough to go and watch this film.
The watch ability factor, though, of child murders makes this film a one time shot. I don’t need to see it ever again. It hit the chord and its done.
Score: 6 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I liked: The combination of the subject matter and Eastwood’s direction had predisposed me to assume that this would be a very dark effort. Instead I found the movie to be an atmospheric, compelling piece of story-telling ideally scored. Jolie’s performance is impressive and nuanced while Malkovich displays his usual screen presence. Jeffrey Donovan segued very effectively from his sympathetic role in “Burn Notice” to the smilingly villainous police captain
What I disliked: This is a lengthy movie at 141 minutes. I felt that the length mirrors the interminable search of a mother for her lost son, and allowed the story to evolve at a pace in keeping with the period. However, some might find it a little slow.
Would I recommend it?: Yes. It was an excellent movie. I assumed that, as a parent, I would not enjoy this movie, encompassing as it does, one of the primal fears for one’s children - abduction and possible death. However, Eastwood’s rendition of this true case is masterly. While I wouldn’t recommend this movie to those seeking light relief after a hard week, it is an ultimately hopeful movie.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “W.”
What I liked: Good cast and character acting, some of the key players of the Bush Administration were spot on, and some were just vague references, but the interaction was believable and surprisingly not as slapstick and caricatured as I had assumed it might be. What was especially intriguing was how the director portrayed the psyche of “W” in some vignettes of inner turmoil and reflection, which was more about what some authors had hinted at in analysis of what may have influenced the President on public policy.
What I disliked: At times I felt like the director was trying to portray “W” as an innocent bystander of his own parties ideology, as well as his own drive and ambition. The storyline seemed to meander around at times and didn’t really pull of the irony of some of the events that have been part of the “W” administration.
Would I recommend it?: Only for true political wonks, and history buffs.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Michael Ritenour
What I liked: There was great acting by Toby Jones who played Karl Rove. Toby commanded his lines but that is no surprise considering all his other fine performances in other films. Ellen Burstyn did an excellent job as Barbara Bush.
What I disliked: The film “W.” offered up nothing new, we’ve already heard it all from the media or standup comedians making fun of Bush. I don’t think this movie was entertaining enough for liberals to get a good laugh, and it’s not innovative enough to offend conservatives. The film dragged throughout and contained little humor; it provoked no emotions. The acting was so dry that the actors seemed as though they were on sleep meds. Josh Brolin’s portrayal of Bush was weak and boring. His Bush accent and gestures were present and then would fade a moment later - it reminded me of Keanu Reeves’ disastrous performance in “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” speaking with an accent and then sounding like a surfer dude in the second half of the same sentence. The Bush character should have been played by a younger actor for the early years because Brolin as a young Bush was not believable. Bush’s attitude and personality were totally inconsistent throughout the film. In some scenes, particularly th e ones in his early (party/drinking) years, he is speaking confidently and seems totally coherent, then in later scenes (sober) he is tripping over his words and using terrible grammar as we are accustomed to in his presidential speeches. I thought all the scenes of Bush having private meetings with his cabinet were absurd. Bush was portrayed as a puppet with little to no ideas of his own. All of these conversations were pure fiction because there are no witnesses to these meetings of national security and therefore no way to validate the content. Aside from the obvious presidential matters that are public knowledge, there is no way to truly validate most of the material in this movie. The movie trailers and tagline imply there will be all this insight into the life of Bush and his rise to the presidency, but it never happens. The majority of the content is about the war and is so redundant and boring it’s like watching CNN.
Would I recommend it?: Absolutely not, unless you ran out of Ambien and need to get to bed.
Score: 2 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I liked: Josh Brolin was amazing as George W. Bush. Brolin went beyond merely copying Bush’s speech pattern and mannerisms; instead, he perfectly portrayed the president’s seemingly self-confident, swaggering cockiness. There were several strong performances in this movie, including Richard Dreyfuss as Dick Cheney and Jeffrey Wright as Colin Powell.
What I disliked: Because Brolin’s performance was so convincing and well done, Thandie Newton’s accurate but over-the-top portrayal of Condoleezza Rice seemed out of place. Also, James Cromwell’s perfomance as George H. W. Bush, while solid, was slightly jarring because Cromwell didn’t look or sound like him at all.
Would I recommend it?: Oliver Stone’s “W.” is a brief, interesting and relatively even-handed look at the life of George W. Bush. Bush supporters will probably think that Stone went too far, while Bush critics will most likely think that Stone didn’t go far enough. The film, like Bush himself, will be loved by some and hated by others.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Lisa Ciurro
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “The Express.”
What I liked: There were so many life messages throughout the movie that people have either forgotten or chosen to ignore. It’s a lot more than 1950’s racism. It’s about watching the country, its ideals, its direction and people’s change of thought process in this time period. There is no denying racism still exists in this country as does many other forms of discrimination, but it still blows my mind to think 50 years ago, how people would react to an African American even coming into the same restaurant as them. Now, we may live to see our first black President. Times have changed and its makes me wonder how much the country will change even more in the next 50 years.
What I disliked: There isn’t much I didn’t like about the film. There were some splashes of comedy, some genuine tear jerker moments that you weren’t ashamed to cover up, and some messages about human behavior that are undeniably important. The only criticism about the film is the underlying movie stereotypes about generational racism. There is always black discrimination with a white “hero” that wants to help out. In reality, I don’t think there is always a hero in everyone’s story.
Would I recommend it?: Yes. Even though this was set in a different time period, the messages in this film still lie true to this day. You don’t really understand where a person is coming from until you step into their shoes.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I liked: As Martin Luther King Jr. said in 1963, “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” In THE EXPRESS, Ernie Davis, superbly portrayed by Rob Brown, stands tall and smiles broadly, no matter who or what opposes him. Instead of another action packed, feel good football movie that becomes depressing and overly sentimental, this is an impressive, heartwarming, funny, motivational, and inspirational movie about an unforgettable football player’s life and experiences.
What I disliked: The filmmakers don’t pull any punches depicting the hate and discrimination that Davis and his peers face growing up in Pennsylvania and playing football in Syracuse. It is uncomfortable to witness the lack of civil rights prevalent in the 1950’s and early 1960’s – especially, but not always, in the south.
Would I recommend it?: If the goal of this film is to motivate viewers to appreciate an exceptional young man, the people in his life, and his accomplishments, it scores a touchdown! Football fans will enjoy this movie, as well as anyone who enjoys films about friendships, family values, and human rights.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Courtenay O’Connell
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you—yes, we mean you—jump into the comments below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching “Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist.”
What I liked: Nick (Michael Cera) and Norah (Kat Dennings) make an adorable couple in this movie. They play off of each other’s witty subtle humor and keep the audience chuckling throughout this mildly funny film. Norah is friends with Tris, a girl who recently broke Nick’s heart. Not realizing that this is the same boy, she asks Nick to pretend to be her boyfriend for five minutes to escape Tris’ taunting. When Norah and Nick realize the other’s connection to Tris, drama ensues. The plot of Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist follows a group of teenagers on a night out in New York City in search of an elusive band called Where’s Fluffy and Norah’s elusive drunk friend, Caroline.
What I disliked: The movie was exactly what I expected. The main disappointment for me is that Michael Cera basically plays the same character he played in Arrested Development, Superbad, and Juno. One wonders if he is capable of playing anything other than an awkward, dorky, and inadvertently funny teenager.
Would I recommend it?: If you’re a fan of Michael Cera’s other films, I would recommend Nick and Norah because you will probably like this one as well.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Jessica Locke
What I liked: “Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist” was at times cute and mildly entertaining. Nick’s ex-girlfriend Tris, played by Alexis Dziena, was very funny, perky, and fun to watch. I thought Tris’ jealousy of Nick trying to move on and her treatment towards her new boyfriend were the funniest aspects of the movie.
What I disliked: In the film’s defense, I think I missed the target audience and that this movie would be better enjoyed by kids in high school or early college years. I felt very unmoved by the romance between Nick and Norah, especially due to an extreme lack of chemistry between them. They looked weird together and scenes of them kissing made me strangely uncomfortable. The dark, busy nightlife of New York City didn’t provide a good backdrop for the blossoming romance, either. I sympathized with Nick’s broken heart but felt that Norah was too frumpy, awkward and argumentative to be believably attractive to soft spoken Nick. I found Norah’s drunken friend, Caroline, to be very annoying and distracting from the plot. Nick’s over-the-top gay band members equally served no purpose other than to lend a real bra to seriously unfeminine Norah. I thought the dual scavenger hunt for drunken Caroline and some silly band across several nightclubs was a stupid, juvenile idea to base the movie around.
Would I recommend it? I’d recommend this movie if you’re young and relatively inexperienced with relationships.
Score: 5 out of 10
- Jessica Conrad
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Ghost Town.
What I Liked: “Ghost Town” is a hilarious comedy about a people hating dentist who, after a funny but disturbing turn of events at the hospital, suddenly has the ability to see dead people. And he soon realizes he hates them as much as the living. Ricky Gervais (from the original “The Office” from the UK and also as Ben Stiller’s Boss in “Night at the Museum”) will make you laugh out loud at his quick wit and smart-alec one liners. His time on “The Office” has really helped him as he plays the goofy but lovable jerk in this film. Greg Kinnear plays Frank, an obnoxious ghost harassing Ricky Gervais’s character for help so he can move on. Kinnear does a decent job at his role but it isn’t anything we haven’t seen him play before. The dialogue is so funny it keeps the film moving. The physical jokes tying the spirit world and the human world together is also well done. The film also adds that touching thought about saying good-bye to the ones we love and reminding us to do the r ight thing for them and ourselves.
What I Disliked: Some of the holes in the plot are a bit bothersome. Like many of the ghosts, some of the story plots just seem like they are not finished. Just as we start to learn the reason why Ricky Gervais’s character hates people so much the scene just ends and we learn no more. And what we have learned makes you question if the situation would really make you hate EVERYONE as much as he does. Also if he hates people so much why would he move to Manhattan from London? We are told it’s complicated but get nothing more. Obviously the writers thought it was VERY complicated and decided to leave explanations out. For that matter, why would a people hater be a DENTIST… in Manhattan? Another hole in the plot is after the dentist confronts the hospital about why he is suddenly seeing dead people, a short explanation is given, and we just move on. Does the main character just accept what has happened to him? Or is he going to take action? Lastly, the ending leaves us wonde ring if he will continue to see ghosts in need. We are never told. The ending leaves you wondering.
Would I Recommend?: Sure the plot has several holes in it but Ricky Gervais is so enjoyable and the laughs are so often that you can forgive the writers… this time. Check out “Ghost Town” because it is an enjoyable film for everyone and has just enough heart to make you remind you to be thankful for those in your life.
Score: 6 out of 10
- John T. McMillin
What I Liked: I liked how funny this film was. After viewing some really awful movies in recent weeks such as Burn After Reading, I was looking forward to a comedy that was actually funny! Ghost Town had the perfect blend of comedy, good feelings and emotion. The characters were just fantastic! I absolutely loved Ricky Gervais. I feared he would annoy me in the movie within the first few minutes, but he came off as surprisingly human.
What I Disliked: I didn’t like the idea of being able to see the dead. That is obviously a personal issue for me, but I’ve always been terrified of ghosts. I think if I ever had the ability to see them I would just have to be locked up. Hallucinations and things of that nature just freak me out!
Would I Recommend?: I would recommend it even though the premise of the film bothers me. The humor and the heart of the story display the importance of getting done today what needs to be done because you never know when your time will be up. Hug your loved ones and keep all of your business finished so that they won’t have to ever ponder what could have been.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Ashley Grant
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Burn After Reading.
What I Liked: Brad Pitt and George Clooney. They were absolutely hilarious. Brad Pitt as a hyped up personal training with the common sense of a gnat and George Clooney as an over the top paranoid sex crazed cheater makes this movie a comedic hit.
What I Disliked: Without their performances, the movie would fall flat. The story takes at least twenty minutes to even get into as nothing is really clear what is going on until then. Plus, it could have been MUCH more funny. This film could have been a comedic genius but it doesn’t go all the way.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, for the cynical over 21 crowd who can understand and maybe even relate to some of these zany characters. This is not for the kids or the family. This is the perfect film for when you are having a bad day at work and you want to laugh and watch other people suffer for a little while!
Score: 7 out of 10
- Michelle Schenck
What I Liked: Everything. It mixes a brilliant group of actors who always give interesting performances; a clever, sly script; and well-paced momentum. The entire cast of this movie are solid in their roles, but Brad Pitt is exceptional. His turn as a gum-chewing highlighted airhead is worth of an Oscar nomination.
What I Disliked: My only qualm about this movie is that I find the Coen brothers predilection for sudden acts of violence a little disconcerting.
Would I Recommend?: I’d definitely strongly recommend it. It’s a superb comedy that an adult can sit through without novacaining one’s brain first.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Marian Hill
Welcome to Reel People. It’s a place where, you guessed it, real people like yourselves spout off on new movie releases. It works best if you - yes, we mean you - jump into the forum link below and tell us what you think of the movie, too.
This week, we’re watching Traitor.
What I Liked: “Traitor” was a good political/action/suspense film all in one, how about that?! The story showed the points of view from both the Americans and the terrorists without pushing a political agenda or a certain way of thinking, how refreshing! Thank goodness this wasn’t another “Lions for Lambs” or “Rendition.” The film was well acted, too many actors to name but I was especially impressed by Don Cheadle, Saïd Taghmaoui, and Guy Pearce. All three actors played their parts with such conviction. Cheadle played the main character who has connections to the FBI and who also has ties to a terrorist group. Unless you have done research you won’t know what side he is really playing on and the suspense is dramatic. His fluctuating emotions and loyalties (or lack thereof!) really keep you guessing. Saïd Taghmaoui, Cheadle’s character’s friend and terrorist leader, showed a wide range of emotions with his acting ability and also inner conflict within his character’s belief system.
Guy Pearce did an outstanding job as an FBI investigator looking into the terrorist activities of Cheadle’s character. Hats off to Steve Martin (yes, the comic!) and Jeffrey Nachmanoff for great storytelling. I also want to point out the fine musical score of Mark Kilian. The music had just the right feel for the many tense moments throughout the film. There are many suspenseful, nail biting moments so if you plan to see it don’t read any spoilers.
What I Disliked: There could have been a harder push that there are plenty of Muslins that do not share the extremist views of the terrorists – however, the filmmakers probably want you to interpret the message how you feel it should be taken. The film also shows the hardship of war and the emotional damage it causes to people, but I think we should have seen more of this.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, this is the most entertaining political film to come along in a while.
Score: 8 out of 10
- Nick Conrad
What I Liked: I liked this movie because it kept your attention throughout. The suspense and action were fantastic. It was good to see Don Cheadle in a role with some meat to it!
What I Disliked: The only thing that one should be careful about is the violence, which is necessary for the storyline. However, it was not as gruesome as it could have been.
Would I Recommend?: I would highly recommend this movie for anyone who likes action, suspense, and drama.
Score: 9 out of 10
- Lauretta Pesce
What I Liked: Traitor was suspenseful and intriguing. Even though this was an action film which focused on such touchy subjects as Fundamentalism and Suicide Bombing, it had a sense of humor. There were quiet a few laughs which helped alleviate some of the tension on the screen. Of course, there were a lot of explosions, suspense, and a few plot twists, the main things I look for in a good action movie.
What I Disliked: Don Cheadle plays Sergeant Samir Horn, a Sudanese born Special Ops soldier who appears to be aiding terrorists. Cheadle’s performance was less than stellar. I expected a lot more from him given his past acting experience. Jeff Daniels’ performance was flat and, despite the fact that his name is flaunted in all the posters and previews, his part was rather small which was a disappointment for me.
The story line of the film was predictable. Shortly after the beginning of the film, I knew how it was going to end but the plot left enough unanswered questions so that there were still a few small surprises.
Would I Recommend?: Yes, this is a good movie. It is suspenseful and despite it’s predictability, it was intriguing.
Score: 7 out of 10
- Jessica A. Locke
Advertisement
